Official Journals By StatPerson Publication
Table of Content Volume 8 Issue 2 - November 2018
Comparison of cis-atracurium with atracurium for balanced general anaesthesia: A randomized double blinded controlled study
Shyamlal Thukral1, Mridul Panditrao2*, Minnu Panditrao3, Shalu Punia4
1Assistant Professor, 2Professor and HOD, 3Professor, 4Jr. Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research (AIMSR) Bathinda-151001, Punjab, INDIA. Email: shamlalthukral@gmail.com
Abstract Background: Atracurium and Csatracurium are intermediate acting muscle relaxants without any much side effects and recovery due to non-organ dependent elimination. This study was conducted to compare the differences between them. Aim and Objective: To compare difference between Atracurium and Cis Atracrium regarding terms of onset, duration of action of first dose, 25% recovery from last supplemental dose and neostigmine reversal Material and Methods: Our study conducted was a prospective randomised observational study conducted 60 ASA Grade I, II patients. Patients were divided into two groups of 30 each. Group A (Atracurium), patients were administered atracurium 0.5 mg/kg while Group B (Cisatracurium) patients received cisatracurium 0.2 mg/kg as loading dose. The onset time, duration of block and recovery index were recorded using Train of Four (TOF) response along with the haemodynamic profile. Results: Mean duration of action (DOA) of 1ST dose in Cisatracurium group was significantly more (72.5± 2.3 min)as compared to atracurium group (40.23± 8.3mins). The mean 25% recovery in Atracurium group was 32.11±3.2 . The mean 25% recovery in Cisatracurium besylate group was 51.61±2.5. The mean 25% recovery in Atracurium and cis atracurium were statistically significantly different.(P<0.05) . Key Words: Non Depolarising Neuro Muscular Blockers, Benzylisoquionolium, Cis Atracurium, Atracurium, Cmparative Study, iIntermediate Acting.
INTRODUCTION The neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) have revolutionized management of balanced General Anaesthesia (GA). Since the introduction of d tubocurarine and succinyl choline, there have been significant advances in the field of neuromuscular blockade. The NMBDs offer many advantages during the conduct of General Anaesthesia viz; Long Surgeries can be performed without voluntary and reflex movements, They don’t cross blood brain barrier, hence no increase of ICP (except succinyl choline). Reduction of intra operative awareness and recall, allows proper muscle relaxation for prolonged period of time, facilitates complete control of airways, breathing and circulation, maintainance of stable Haeamodynamics, lack cerebral side effects hence can be used in cerebral trauma cases also .These drugs have minimal side effects, rapid metabolism to inactive products, action confined to neuromuscular junctions only can be used in liver and renal diseases also, they don’t cross placenta can be used in obstetrtic cases. They are not without dis advantages like cardiovascular effects by benzyl iso quonololinium agents other than doxa curium can cause histamine release, Miva curium cause maximum histamine release can result into broncho constriction, flushing . Pancronium and Gallamine can cause tachycardia, Tubo curarine causes vasodilation and hypotension .Now with the introduction of newer Benzyl isoquonolinium derivatives like Atracurium and Cis Atra curium duration of action is maximum as compared to Doxa curium and Miva curium more than 30 to 40 minutes, Their elimination is through ester hydrolysis and holfman elimination a process dependant on pH and temperature whereas steroid derivativtes like Pancuronium and Vecronium, Rocuronium, Piercoronium have elimination through renal or hepatic route. Cisatracurium is a new intermediate duration, non-depolarizing, benzylisoquinolinium neuromuscular blocking drug which is a stereoisomer of atracurium with a potency of approximately 3 to 4 times greater than that of atracurium1, 2. Despite the higher potency, cisatracurium is associated with more stable hemodynamics than atracurium and does not cause histamine release even at doses of up to 0.4mg/kg (8×ED95).3 The same dose (2×ED95) atracurium is more effective neuromuscular blocking agent than cisatracurium. However, higher doses of cisatracurium 0.2mg/kg (4×ED95) and 0.3mg/kg (6×ED95) provide more effective, more rapid neuromuscular blocking with longer duration of action, stable hemodynamic status and no signs of histamine release clinically during abdominal surgery.4,5 This study was conducted to compare the atracurium and cis atracurium with respect to neuromuscular blockade and recovery characterstics. To compare difference between Atracurium and Cis Atracrium with 2*ED 95 regarding terms of onset, intubating conditions after three minutes of 1st dose, safety and efficacy of both the drugs, Heamodynamic effects, signs any adverse reaction, duration of action of first dose, 25% recovery from last supplemental dose and neostigmine reversal . Because of its intermediate, onset of action, cisatracurium is not recommended for rapid sequence endotracheal intubation in emrgancy cases (i.e., where intubation is uregently and rapidly required to minimize the time the airway is unprotected) Our study was a prospective double blinded randomized controlled study conducted in the Department of Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Study was approved by ethical committee of the institute . a written valid consent was taken from patients after explaining the study to them. All cases of ASA Grade I and II were selected. 30 patients were allocated in each group randomly.
MATERIAL AND METHODS All cases were were given Ringer lactate before induction for all type of surgeries. Standard monitoring were performned with multi para monitor for ECG, HR, Spo2 Temperature, Capnograpgy before anaesthsia and during anaesthesia and neuromuscular monitoring for TOF. Patients age, sex, weight, type of surgery, informed consent and expected duration of surgery were recorded preoperatively .. Group A of 30 patients received injection Cis Atra curium 0.2mg /kg as loading for intubation as well as for conducting surgeries and maintenance dose 0.03 mg /kg. Group B patients were given injection Atracurium 0.5 mg /kg as loading dose and 0.1 mg /kg as maintenance dose. In both groups these muscle relaxants were given after premedication and induction agents like Inj. Propofol 2 mg /kg IV and inhalational agents like Oxygen 100 % 3 litres / N2O 3 litres and Isoflurane 0.5% to 1% were given to all patients till the intubation and onset time was noted from the time of first dose of muscle relaxant to TOF 0 Zero. After intubation Oxygen and N2O low flow 1: 1.5 L/ minute were given . Hemodynamic parameters including systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, MAP and heart rate, side effects in any were monitored one minutes, after three minutes at the time of intubation, after one minutes, three minutes at the time of intubation, after 5 minutes after administration of the first dose and then every 10 minutes throughout the surgery. Recovery profile were concluded. Using Train of Four (TOF) response with nerve stimulator using 50 Ma 2HZ power through electrodes to stimulate ulnar nerve every 15 seconds. Subsequent dose of Muscle relaxant were given when TOF was 2 . when at the end of surgery when TOF recovery was 25% from the last dose, reversal was achieved by administration of neostigmine and glycopyrrolate mixture (0.05 mg/kg neostigmine and 8µk/kg glycopyrrolate ) through slow IV injection. RESULTS The onset of action time was fixed as 3 minutes for intubation for both the groups . During intubation after first dose of muscle relaxant, we observed condition of larnygoscopy, vocal cords, reaction 1to intubation as under
Table 1:
Table 1: Results of in tubating condition within 3 minutes
Table 2: Comparison of Atracurium and Cis atracurium group according to variables
Table 3: Comparison of atracurium and cis atracurium group according to variables
Table 4: Heart rate changes before and after administration of Atracurium or Cisatracurium
Baseline recording were not significantly different (P-value < 0.05) There was a statistically significant increase in Pulse Rate, Mean Arterial Pressure post intubation when compared to baseline and post injection of 2×ED95 dose of atracurium in group 2 and the same dose of cisatracurium in group 1. Pulse Rate, Mean arterial blood pressure changes 5-30 minutes later were not statistically significant
Table 5: Comparison of Mean Arterial Pressure changes before and after intubation
*Statistically significant difference versus Baseline reading (P-value < 0.05Table 6: Adverse reaction profile
Mean age in atracurium group was 32.57± 5.64 years while Mean age in cis atracurium was 34.82± 5.31years.(p value >0.05). Mean Systolic and diastolic blood pressures and pulse rate in atracurium group were 131± 21.69, mm of hg, 84± 19.35mm of hg and 78± 7.3 per minute respectively while in cis atracurium group were 134± 23.41 mm of Hg, 86± 12.32 mm of Hg and 75±4.2 respectively. Difference between them was statistically not significant.(p >0.05) Table 3 showed comparison between both groups for neuromuscular blockade and recovery profile. Mean onset of action in Atracurium and cis atracurium group it was kept 3 minutes to see intubating conditions as per Table no. 1 while relaxation was excellent in 66.66% with atracuriumm and 60% in cisatracurium .Relaxation was good in 26.66% with atracurium and 30% with cis atracurium cases while relaxation was poor at the time of intubation in 6.66% cases withnatracurium and 10% with cis atracurium there were no significant difference for intubating conditions Mean duration of action (DOA) of 1ST dose in Cisatracurium group was more (72.5± 2.3 min)as compared to atracurium group (40.23± 8.3mins).this difference was statistically significant.(<0.05) The mean 25% recovery in Atracurium group was 32.11±3.2 . The mean 25% recovery in Cisatracurium besylate group was 51.61±2.5 . This difference was statistically significant. (p<0.05) The mean time of recovery from reversal in atracurium and cis atracurium was 2.1±0.3 and 2.5±0.2 respectively. This difference was statistically significant. (p<0.05)
DISCUSSION Mean age, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate were comparable and difference between them is statistically not significant. simlar findings were observed in M.T. Carroll et al6,El –kasaby et al7. They studied different doses of cis atracurium with atracurium and they observed that with the higher doses of cisatracurium (4×ED95 and 6×ED95) onset of action was significantly faster than with atracurium. Mean duration of action (DOA) of 1ST dose in Cisatracurium group was significantly more (72.5± 2.3 min)as compared to atracurium group (40.23± 8.3mins). Similar results were observed by El –kasaby et al. where they found statistically significant difference in both the drugs.7 Bluestein and colleagues in their study observed that increasing the dose of cisatracurium (from 0.1 to 0.15 and 0.2 mg/kg) increases the mean time of clinically effective duration (45 to 55 and 61 min, respectively).8 Also C.E. Smith, observed that duration of action of cisatracurium and atracurium were comparable but statistically not significant.9 The mean 25% recovery in Atracurium group was 32.11±3.2 . The mean 25% recovery in Cisatracurium besylate group was 51.61±2.5. This difference was statistically significant. (p<0.05). M. T. Carroll in his study observed the time from drug administration to 25% recovery with cisatracurium 0.15 mg.kg−1 (51–59 min) was longer compared with both cisatracurium 0.1 mg.kg−1 (45–48 min) and atracurium 0.5mg/kg (47–48 min) but the difference was not statisticaly significant.6 Antagonism of neuromuscular blockade should be initiated preferably when two to four TOF responses are observed. The mean time of recovery from reversal in atracurium and cis atracurium was 2.1±0.3 and 2.5±0.2 respectively.this difference was statistically significant. (p<0.05) In our study in cisatracurium group reversal was given at a mean TOF of 44.90% along with assessment of clinical parameters. This TOF was 2.5minutes from TOF 25%. In atracurium group reversal was initiated at mean TOF of 42.07% after assessing clinical parameters which was 2.1 minutes TOF ratio 25%. Bergeron et al in his study while comparing 3 different doses of cisatracurium 0.05mg/kg, 0.15mg/kg and 0.3 mg/kg; observed that onset time was not significantly different between the doses in adults, but recovery time increased, 23 and 24 minutes respectively.10 CONCLUSION Cisatracurium has a faster onset, good intraoperative hemodynamic parameters and better recovery profile
|
|