Home About Us Contact Us

Official Journals By StatPerson Publication

Table of Content - Volume 8 Issue 2 - November 2018

 

A study of effect of insulin therapy on the endothelial dysfunction in the type II diabetic patients at tertiary health care centre

 

M Vijay Mohan1, Mohammad Rafi2*

 

1Professor, 2Professor & HOD, Department of Biochemistry, RVM Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Laxmakkapally(V), Mulugu(Mdl), Siddipet District, Telangana, INDIA.

Email: warangalmetro@gmail.com

 

Abstract               Background: Diabetes is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease1. Hyperglycemia2 and insulin resistance Aims and Objectives: To Study effect of insulin therapy on the endothelial dysfunction in the type II diabetic patients at tertiary health care centre. Methodology:  This was a cross-sectional study carried out in the department Medicine of a tertiary health care centre in the type II diabetic patients during the one year period i.e. June 2017 to June 2018 , all the diabetic patients either on oral hypoglycemic drugs or oral hypoglycemic drugs were randomly selected, oral hypoglycemic drugs (OH) were 35 and oral hypoglycemic drugs and insulin(OH+I) 15, The statistical analysis done by unpaired t-test and analyzed by SPSS 19 version.  Result:  In our study we have seen that the majority of the patients were in the age group of 50-60 were 27.78% followed by 40-50 were 25.93%, >60 were 20.37%, 30-40 were 16.67%, 20-30 were 9.26%. The majority of the patients were Male i.e. 59.26% and Female were 40.74% . The patients in the Oral Hypoglycemic (OH) were 35 (64.81) and OH+ Insulin (OH + I) were 19 (35.19). The levels of MDA   (Mean ±SD)   were significantly lower i.e. 1.93 ± 0.92 and 3.12 ± 1.34 (t=3.36,df=48,p<0.0001),  FRAP  (Mean ±SD) -0.82 ± 0.38   and 0.45 ± 0.15  (t=4.56,df=48,p<0.001),  NO   (Mean ±SD) - 18.23 ± 3.42    and 13.34 ± 4.21   (t=5.24,df=48,p<0.001) respectively in the OH  and  OH + I   groups. Conclusion:  It can be concluded from our study that the patients on the insulin treatment were significantly less NO level and more in the oxidative stress, enzymes like FRAP and MDA level are low. Hence it indicated that insulin treatment group is having more endothelial dysfunction and more oxidative stress.

Key Word: oral hypoglycemic drugs (OH), FRAP, MDA, oxidative stress.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease1. Hyperglycemia2 and insulin resistance3 are the characteristics of type 2 diabetes most often attributed a causal relation with atherosclerosis. Their possible influence on vascular endothelial function may explain the particular risk of diabetic vascular disease, because endothelial dysfunction is one of the earliest events identified in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and thrombosis4. Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation is associated with insulin resistance5, and this association may be represented in the vasculature by abnormalities in insulin stimulated endothelial function. Thus, insulin induces vasorelaxation mediated by endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) in isolated rat skeletal muscle arterioles6, and in healthy humans, insulin has a stimulating effect on NO dependent basal blood flow7,8 and on agonist-stimulated endothelium-dependent vasodilation9,10. However, these effects are blunted in patients with obesity-associated insulin resistance or type 2 diabetes10,12

 

METHODOLOGY

This was a cross-sectional study carried out in the department Medicine of a tertiary health care centre in the type II diabetic patients during the one year period i.e. June 2017 to June 2018, all the diabetic patients either on oral hypoglycemic drugs and insulin drugs were randomly selected with the written  and explained consent during the one year so during the one year the treatment group selected for study were oral hypoglycemic drugs (OH) were 35 and oral hypoglycemic drugs and insulin(OH+I) 15 . All the patients in the study were undergone biochemical analysis regarding the enzymes responsible for the endothelial functioning i.e. MDA was manually estimated by thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) method and antioxidant capacity was estimated as FRAP. NO was measured by using kinetic cadmium reduction method. The statistical analysis done by unpaired t-test and analyzed by SPSS 19 version.


 

RESULT                                  

Table 1: Distribution of the patients as per the age

Age

No.

Percentage (%)

20-30

5

9.26

30-40

9

16.67

40-50

14

25.93

50-60

15

27.78

>60

11

20.37

Total

54

100.00

The majority of the patients were in the age group of 50-60 were 27.78% followed by 40-50 were 25.93%, >60 were 20.37%, 30-40 were 16.67%, 20-30 were 9.26%.

                                                                                   

Table 2: Distribution of the patients as per the sex

Sex

No.

Percentage (%)

Male

27

59.26

Female

24

40.74

Total

54

100.00

The majority of the patients were Male i.e. 59.26% and Female were 40.74%

 

Table 3: Distribution of the patients as per the treatment group

Treatment  group

No.

Percentage (%)

Oral Hypoglycemic (OH)

35

64.81

OH+ Insulin (OH + I)

19

35.19

Total

54

100.00

The patients in the Oral Hypoglycemic (OH) were 35 (64.81) and OH+ Insulin (OH + I) were 19 (35.19).

 

Table 4: Distribution of the patients as per the endothelial function

 

OH (n=35)

 

OH + I (n=15)

Total

MDA (Mean ±SD)

1.93 ± 0.92

3.12 ± 1.34

t=3.36,df=48,p<0.0001

FRAP (Mean ±SD)

0.82 ± 0.38

0.45 ± 0.15

t=4.56,df=48,p<0.001

NO (Mean ±SD)

18.23 ± 3.42

13.34 ± 4.21

t=5.24,df=48,p<0.001

The levels of MDA (Mean ±SD) significantly lower i.e. 1.93 ± 0.92 and 3.12 ± 1.34 (t=3.36,df=48,p<0.0001),  FRAP  (Mean ±SD) -0.82 ± 0.38   and 0.45 ± 0.15  (t=4.56,df=48,p<0.001),  NO   (Mean ±SD) - 18.23 ± 3.42    and 13.34 ± 4.21   (t=5.24,df=48,p<0.001) respectively in the OH  and  OH + I   groups.


DISCUSSION

Type 2 diabetic subjects are more prone to cardiovascular diseases in the worldwide population. Even though the subjects undergo anti-diabetic treatment, the complications are more in these cases. Insulin is not a treatment for type 2 diabetic subjects, but in uncontrolled condition, insulin is required. Earlier studies have been reported that hyperinsulin emia itself is a risk factor in causing vascular complications.13,14,15 However, endothelial dysfunction is an initial stage of developing vascular complications. Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is an imbalance between vasoconstriction and vasodilatation in vascular tissues. Endothelial function is mainly regulated by endothelial-1, NO, and prostacyclin.16 The most common soluble markers to analyze endothelial function include NO, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), E-selectin and von Willebrand factor (vWF) etc.17,18 Among these, NO is an important marker to assess vascular endothelial function and its impairment. Reduced availability of nitric oxide indicates impaired endothelial function and also an initiator for the development and progression of atherosclerosis.19 In our study we have seen that the majority of the patients were in the age group of 50-60 were 27.78% followed by 40-50 were 25.93%, >60 were 20.37%, 30-40 were 16.67%, 20-30 were 9.26%. The majority of the patients were Male i.e. 59.26% and Female were 40.74%. The patients in the Oral Hypoglycemic (OH) were 35 (64.81) and OH+ Insulin (OH + I) were 19 (35.19). The levels of MDA   (Mean ±SD)   were significantly lower i.e. 1.93 ± 0.92    and 3.12 ± 1.34 (t=3.36,df=48,p<0.0001),  FRAP  (Mean ±SD) -0.82 ± 0.38   and 0.45 ± 0.15  (t=4.56,df=48,p<0.001),  NO   (Mean ±SD) - 18.23 ± 3.42    and 13.34 ± 4.21   (t=5.24,df=48,p<0.001) respectively in the OH  and  OH + I   groups. These findings are similar with Siva P Palem 20 et al they found a significantly lower level of NO in OHDI group than OHD group and healthy controls. Slightly lower level of NO was observed in subjects with OHD alone compared to healthy control.

 

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded from our study that the patients on the insulin treatment were significantly less NO level and more in the oxidative stress, enzymes like FRAP and MDA levels are low. Hence it indicated that insulin treatment group is having more endothelial dysfunction and more oxidative stress.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Clark CM Jr, Perry RC: Type 2 diabetes and macrovascular disease: epidemiology and etiology. Am Heart J 138: S330–S333, 1999
  2. Laakso M: Hyperglycemia and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 48:937–942, 1999
  3. Haffner SM: Epidemiology of insulin resistance and its relation to coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 84:11J–14J, 1999
  4.  Biegelsen ES, Loscalzo J: Endothelial function and atherosclerosis. Coron Artery Dis 10:241–256, 1999 5. Petrie JR, Ueda S, Webb DJ, Elliott HL, Connell JM: Endothelial nitric oxide production and insulin sensitivity: a physiological link with implications for pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. Circulation 93:1331– 1333, 1996
  5. Chen YL, Messina EJ: Dilation of isolated skeletal muscle arterioles by insulin is endothelium dependent and nitric oxide mediated. Am J Physiol 270:H2120–H2124, 1996
  6. Steinberg HO, Brechtel G, Johnson A, Fineberg N, Baron AD: Insulinmediated skeletal muscle vasodilation is nitric oxide dependent: a novel action of insulin to increase nitric oxide release. J Clin Invest 94:1172– 1179, 1994
  7. Scherrer U, Randin D, Vollenweider P, Vollenweider L, Nicod P: Nitric oxide release accounts for insulin’s vascular effects in humans. J Clin Invest 94:2511–2515, 1994
  8. Taddei S, Virdis A, Mattei P, Natali A, Ferrannini E, Salvetti A: Effect of insulin on acetylcholine-induced vasodilation in normotensive subjects and patients with essential hypertension. Circulation 92:2911–2918, 1995
  9.  Steinberg HO, Chaker H, Leaming R, Johnson A, Brechtel G, Baron AD: Obesity/insulin resistance is associated with endothelial dysfunction: implications for the syndrome of insulin resistance. J Clin Invest 97:2601– 2610, 1996
  10. Laakso M, Edelman SV, Brechtel G, Baron AD: Decreased effect of insulin to stimulate skeletal muscle blood flow in obese man: a novel mechanism for insulin resistance. J Clin Invest 85:1844–1852, 1990
    Laakso M, Edelman SV, Brechtel G, Baron AD: Impaired insulin-mediated skeletal muscle blood flow in patients with NIDDM. Diabetes 41:1076– 1083, 1992
  11. Sukumar P, Viswambharan H, Imrie H, Cubbon RM, Yuldasheva N, Gage M, Galloway S, Skromna A, Kandavelu P, Santos CX, Gatenby VK. Nox2 NADPH oxidase has a critical role in insulin resistance–related endothelial cell dysfunction. Diabetes. 2013 Jun 1;62(6):2130-2134
  12. Ceriello A, Assaloni, R, Da Ros R, Maier A, Piconi L, Quagliaro L, Giugliano D. Effect of atorvastatin and irbesartan, alone and in combination, on postprandial endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and inflammation in type 2 diabetic patients. Circulation 2005;111(19):2518-2524.
  13.  Edwin Ho, Galougahi KK, Liu CC, Bhindi R, Figtree GA. Biological markers of oxidative stress: applications to cardiovascular research and practice. Redox biology 2013;1(1):483-491.
  14.  Atul A, Aggarwal S, Veneet D, Yadav NH. Diabetic Nephropathy: An Updated Review. International Journal of Chemical and Analytical Sciences 2010;1(3):50-57
  15. Thorand B, Baumert J, Chambless L, Meisinger C, Kolb H, Doring A, et al. Elevated markers of endothelial dysfunction predict type 2 diabetes mellitus in middle-aged men and women from the general population. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2006 Feb 1;26(2):398-405.
  16. Horstman LL, Jy W, Jimenez JJ, Ahn YS. Endothelial microparticles as markers of endothelial dysfunction. Front Biosci 2004;9(1):118-135.
  17. Davignon J, Ganz P. Role of endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis. Circulation 2004;109(23 suppl 1):III-27