Official Journals By StatPerson Publication

 

A study of identification of poor prognostic factors in metabolic encephalopathy

 

Harsha Gopinath1*, T Duraickannu2, G Rakesh Kumar3, Roopak Mohan4

 

1Resident, 2Associate Professor, 3Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Kirumpakkam, Pondicherry, INDIA.

4Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Research Institute, Pondicherry, INDIA.

Email: harsharoopak21@gmail.com

 

Abstract            Introduction: Metabolic encephalopathy is a transient cerebral dysfunction which may cause temporary or permanent damage to the brain due to lack of glucose, oxygen or other metabolic agent. Most of the cases occur when the liver cannot function normally to remove toxins from the bloodstream during an acute illness, but it can also be caused by other systemic diseases especially renal disease and endocrine disease Aims and Objectives: Study of Identification of Poor Prognostic Factors in Metabolic Encephalopathy. Methodology: This is a cross sectional study including 100 patients with metabolic encephalopathy satisfying inclusion criteria. Cases admitted in the Medical Intensive care unit (MICU) of Aarupadai Veedu Medical college hospital and diagnosed as metabolic encephalopathy from June 2013 to May 2015 were included in the present study. Chi –square test was used by statistical significance Result: The variables identified as poor prognostic factors were Age >60; OR 3.1 (2.85-6.56).Female; OR 1.5(1.45-8.6). H/O Chronic Liver Disease; OR 2.5(2.32-5.6).Ascites; OR 2.87 (2.2-4.5). Jaundice; OR 2.92 (2.25-5.45) and Dys-electremia OR 3.1(2.95-6.67). ESR ≥ 34 OR 1.2(1.1-4.32). Cirrhosis on USG OR3.2 (2.85-5.62). AST: ALT ≥ 2.1 OR 3.5(2.82-6.62). Total Bilirubin≥4 OR 2.75(2.12-6.65). In outcome of the patients Improved 65% and Recovered completely in 15%, Discharge against Medical Advise 7%; Death occurred in 13% the most common factors associated like Age >60 Female, Chronic Liver Disease, Ascites, Jaundice, Dys-electremia, ESR ≥ 34, Cirrhosis on USG AST: ALT ≥ 2, Total Bilirubin≥4. Conclusion: The poor prognostic factors identified in our study were Age >60 Female, Chronic Liver Disease, Ascites, Jaundice, Dys-electrolemia, ESR ≥ 34, Cirrhosis on USG AST: ALT ≥ 2, Total Bilirubin≥4 these poor prognostic factors were mostly associated with death.

Keywords: Metabolic Encephalopathy, Chronic Liver Disease, Ascites, Jaundice, Dys-electremia, ESR.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

Metabolic encephalopathies are characterized by a period of progressive somnolence or delirium after which the patients gradually sinks into stupor and finally to coma2.The development of metabolic encephalopathy may be the first manifestation of a critical systemic illness and may be caused by various reasons 1,2,3,4,5 One of the most important causes of metabolic encephalopathy seems to be sepsis (i.e. septic encephalopathy)5,6,7,8 Metabolic encephalopathy is transient cerebral dysfunction which may cause temporary or permanent damage to the brain due to lack of glucose, oxygen or other metabolic agent. Most of the cases occur when the liver cannot function normally to remove toxins from the bloodstream during an acute illness, but it can also be caused by other systemic diseases especially renal disease and endocrine disease. Drugs and toxins are immediate differential diagnosis where we get history of abuse or overdoses. Metabolic encephalopathies are characterized by a period of progressive somnolence or delirium after which the patients gradually sinks into stupor and finally into coma. Common causes of metabolic encephalopathy according to pathophysiology are loss of substrate for cerebral metabolism, hypoxia, hypoglycemia, global ischemia, hyponatremia or hypernatremia, hyperglycemia/hyperosmolar, hypercalcemia, hypermagnesemia, Status epilepticus, post seizure state, hypothyroidism, hypocortisolismm. toxins, hypercarbia, liver failure, renal failure. The development of metabolic encephalopathy may be the first manifestation of a critical systemic illness and may be caused by various reasons 9,10,11,12,13 One of the most important causes of metabolic encephalopathy seems to be sepsis (i.e. septic encephalopathy)13,14,15,16

 

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To study of Identification of Poor Prognostic Factors in Metabolic Encephalopathy

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a cross sectional study including 100 patients with metabolic encephalopathy satisfying inclusion criteria. Cases admitted in the Medical Intensive care unit (MICU) of Aarupadai Veedu Medical college hospital and diagnosed as metabolic encephalopathy from June 2013 to May 2015 were included in the present study. Patients above 18 years of age, who developed metabolic encephalopathy during the study period included into study while Age below 18 years, Known case of pituitary surgery and head injury, Non metabolic causes of encephalopathy were excluded from the study.Odds ratio was used with 95% Confidance Interval was used statistical significance.

 

RESULT

 

Table 1: Poor Prognostic Factors of encephalopathyPatients

Variables

Odds Ratio (95% CI)

Clinical

Age >60

3.1 (2.85-6.56)

Female

1.5(1.45-8.6)

H/O Chronic Liver Disease

2.5(2.32-5.6)

Ascites

2.87(2.2-4.5)

Jaundice

2.92(2.25-5.45)

Investigations

Dys-electremia

3.1(2.95-6.67)

ESR ≥ 34

1.2(1.1-4.32)

Cirrhosis on USG

3.2(2.85-5.62)

AST : ALT ≥ 2.1

3.5(2.82-6.62)

Total Bilirubin≥4

2.75(2.12-6.65)

 

The variables identified as poor prognostic factors were Age >60; OR 3.1 (2.85-6.56). Female; OR 1.5(1.45-8.6). H/O Chronic Liver Disease; OR2.5 (2.32-5.6). Ascites; OR 2.87(2.2-4.5). Jaundice; OR2.92 (2.25-5.45) and Dys-electremia OR 3.1(2.95-6.67). ESR ≥ 34 OR 1.2(1.1-4.32). Cirrhosis on USG OR3.2 (2.85-5.62). AST: ALT ≥ 2.1 OR 3.5(2.82-6.62). Total Bilirubin≥4 OR 2.75(2.12-6.65).

 

Table 2: Distribution of the Patients as per the Outcome

Outcome

No

Percentage (%)

Improved

65

65

Recovered

15

15

Discharge against Medical Advise

7

7

Death

13

13

Total

100

100

 

In outcome of the patients Improved 65% and Recovered completely in 15%, Discharge against Medical Advice 7%; Death occurred in 13% the most common factors associated like Age >60 Female, Chronic Liver Disease, Ascites, Jaundice, Dyselectrolemia, ESR ≥ 34, Cirrhosis on USG AST : ALT ≥ 2, Total Bilirubin≥4.

 

DISCUSSION

Metabolic encephalopathy is common among patients in critical care units77. The encephalopathies are divided into various types based on the cause of the encephalopathy. It is a general term describing the disease that affects the structure or function of our brain. In a recent study done by Surtees R et al they found that metabolic encephalopathy is one of the leading cause of encephalopathies17. Almost one third of the patients under critical care are diagnosed to have metabolic encephalopathy17. The clinical features of the metabolic encephalopathy to differentiate between different etiologies is generally not of much help because whatever be the etiology the clinical presentation will almost be the same18. The clinical picture of metabolic encephalopathies has no aetiological specificity19. It combines disturbances in conscious level dominated by disorientation in time and space and disturbances in motor activity, in particular, tremor and asterixis. For each of the aetiologies studied, the following are considered: the circumstances of onset, the clinical and laboratory picture, the pathophysiologyand the treatment. From a diagnostic standpoint, particular emphasis should be placed upon the circumstances of onset, which alone give any indication18,19. In our study we have found The variables identified as poor prognostic factors were Age >60; OR 3.1 (2.85-6.56).Female; OR 1.5(1.45-8.6). H/O Chronic Liver Disease; OR 2.5(2.32-5.6).Ascites; OR 2.87(2.2-4.5). Jaundice; OR 2.92 (2.25-5.45) and Dys-electremia OR 3.1(2.95-6.67). ESR ≥ 34 OR 1.2(1.1-4.32). Cirrhosis on USG OR3.2 (2.85-5.62). AST: ALT ≥ 2.1 OR 3.5(2.82-6.62). Total Bilirubin≥4 OR 2.75(2.12-6.65). In outcome of the patients Improved 65% and Recovered completely in 15%, Discharge against Medical Advise 7%; Death occurred in 13% the most common factors associated like Age >60 Female, Chronic Liver Disease, Ascites, Jaundice,Dys-electremi, ESR ≥ 34, Cirrhosis on USG AST : ALT ≥ 2, Total Bilirubin≥4. These findings are in confirmation with Om K. Pathak (2016) et al20.

 

CONCLUSION

The poor prognostic factors identified in our study were Age >60 Female, Chronic Liver Disease, Ascites, Jaundice,Dys-electremi, ESR ≥ 34, Cirrhosis on USG AST : ALT ≥ 2, Total Bilirubin≥4 these poor prognostic factors were mostly associated with death.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Robert. B.Daroff, Gerald. M.Fenichel, Josephjankovic, John. C.Mazziotta, Bradleys Neurology in clinical practice,6th edition,vol 2, 1581-1582
  2. C. Keith Stone, L. Humphries, Current diagnosis and treatment Emergency medicine, 6th edition, 2008, 793-96.
  3. Eric R. Kandle, James H. Schwartz, Thomas M. Jessell, Principle of Neural science, 4th edition, 1684-85.
  4. Allan H. Ropper, Martin A. Samuels, Adams and Victor’s Principles of Neurology, 10th Edition, 2005, 308-310.
  5. Willam F. Ganong, Review of medical physiology, 25th edition, 192-93, 266-76.
  6. Arthur C. Guyton, John E. Hall, textbook of medical physiology, 13th edition, 687, 717-19, 723-26.
  7. Fauci, Braunwald, Kasper, Hauser, Longo, Jameson, Loscalzo, Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, 19th edition, 169-70, 277-78.
  8. Lee Goldman, Dennis Ausiello, Cecil medicine, 25th edition, 2004; 678-680.
  9. Christian Zauner, Alexandra Gendo, Ludwing Kramer, Alexander Kranz, Georg Grimm, Christian Madl, Metabolic encephalopathy in critically ill patients sufferingfrom septic or nonseptic multiple organ failure critical care medicine 2000; 28:1310-1315
  10. Isensee LM, Weiner LJ, Hart RG: Neurologic desorders in a medical intensive care unit. J Crit Care 1989; 4:208-210.
  11. Bleck TB, Smith MC, Pierre-Louis SJC, et al: Neurologic complication of critical medical illness. Crit Care Med 1993; 21:98-103.
  12. Pine RW, Wertz MJ, Lennard ES, et al: Determinants organ malfunction or death in patients with intra-abdominal sepsis: A discriminate analysis. Arch Surg 1983; 118:242-249.
  13. Sprung CL, Peduzzi PN, ShatneyCh, et al: Impact of encephalopathy on mortality in the sepsis syndrome. Crit Care Med 1990; 13:297-304.
  14. Sprung CL, Peduzzi PN, Shatney CH, et al: Impact of encephalopathy on mortality in the sepsis syndrome. Crit Care Med 1990; 18:801-806.
  15. Young GB: Neurologic complications of systemic critical illness. NeurolClin 1995; 13:645-658.
  16. Edelman LA, Putterman D, Putterman C, et al: The spectrum of septic encephalopathy: Definitions, etiologies, and mortalities. JAMA 1996; 275:470-473.
  17. JonaidiJafari N-Hyponatremia due to pulmonary tuberculosis: review of 200 cases.
  18. Christian Overgaard-Steensen-Clinical review: Practical approach to hyponatraemia and hypernatraemia in critically ill patients.
  19. Agarwal SMAgrawal A. A comparative study of the clinico-aetiological profile of hyponatremia at presentation with that developing in the hospital.
  20. Om K. Pathak, RajuPaudel, Om B. Panta, Hom P. Pant, Bishnu R. Giri, BaikunthaAdhikar. Retrospective Study of the Clinical Profile and Prognostic Indicators in Patients of Alcoholic Liver Disease Admitted to a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Western Nepal. The Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology 2016. 15(3); 171-175.

.


STATPERSON PUBLISHING GROUP | Aurangabad | Maharashtra |2016 | INDIA
© Copyright 2016 Statperson Publishing Corporation. a division of Statperson Consultancy.
All Rights Reserved