Home About Us Contact Us

 

Table of Content - Volume 7 Issue 1 - July 2017


Morphometric evaluation of human femur

 

Dhairyashilrao Y Shinde1, Anita Gaule2*

 

1Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be university Dental college and hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, INDIA.

2Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, B. Y. L. Nair hospital and T. N. Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, INDIA.

Email: anita.shrikrishan@gmail.com

 

REFERENCES

  1. Susan Standring. Gray’s Anatomy. The Anatomical basis of clinical practice. 40th edition. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, London. 2008; 1360-13.
  2. Harcourt-Smith WEH.The origins of bipedal locomotion. In: Henke W Tattersall I (eds). Handbook of paleoanthropology. Vol III Phylogeny of hominids. Springer, Berlin: 2007; pp.1492-1493.
  3. Bidmos MA. Estimation of stature using fragmentary femora in indigenous south Africans, Int J Legal Med 2008; 122(4):293-9.
  4. Strecker W, Keppler P, Gebhard F, Kinzl L. Length and Torsion of the Lower Limb.J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1997; 79-B: 1019-23.
  5. Soni G,Dhall U, Chhabra S. Determination of Sex from Femur: A Discriminant Analysis. Journal of Anatomical Society of India 2010; 59(2):216-221.
  6. Leelavathy N, Rajangam S, Janakiram S, Thomas IM. Sexing of the Femora. Journal of the Anatomical Society of India 2000; 49(1):17-20.
  7. Arora AK, Gupta P, Mahajan S, Kapoor SS.Significance of sacral index in estimation of sex in sacra of cadavers in Punjab.J Indian Acad Forensic Med 2015;32(1):25-27.
  8. Duthie RA, Bruce MF, Hutchison JD. Changing proximal femoral geometry in north east Scotland, an osteometric study. BMJ1998; 316(16):1498.
  9. Valter José da Silva,JulianoYasuo Oda,Débora de Mello GonçalesSant'Ana. Anatomical Aspects of the Proximal Femur of Adult Brazilians. Int J Morphol 2003; 21(4):303-308.
  10. Züylan T,Murshid KA.An Analysis of Anatolian Human Femur Anthropometry.Turk J Med Sci 2002;32:231-235.
  11. Chauhan R, Paul S, Dhaon B.K. Anatomical Parameters of North Indian Hip Joints – Cadaveric Study. J AnatSoc India 2002; 51(1):39-42.
  12. Asala SA, Mbajiorgu FE, Papandro BA. A comparative study of femoral head diameters and sex differentiation in Nigerians. ActaAnatomica 1998; 162:232-237.
  13. Afroze A, Huda MD. Femoral Head Diameters and Sex Differentiation in the Northern Zone (Rajshahi) of Bangladesh.TAJ December 2005; 18(2):84-88.
  14. Mishra AK, Chalise P, Singh RP, Shah RK.The proximal femur –a second look at rational of implant design. Nepal Med Coll J 2009; 11(4):278-280.
  15. Otsianyi WK, Naipanoi AP, Koech A.The femoral collodiaphyseal angle amongst selected Kenyan ethnic groups. JMorpholSci 2011; 28(2):129-131.
  16. Ali L. Neck-Shaft Angle of Femur in Pakistan Population, The Professional Medical Journal2003; 10(1):19-22.
  17. Saikia KC, Bhuyan SK, Rongphar R. Anthropometric study of the hip joint in Northeastern region population with computed tomography scan. Indian J Orthop 2008; 42(3):260–266.
  18. Pandya AM, et al. A Study of the Femoral Bicondylar Angle in the Gujarat Region.J AnatSoc India2008; 57(2):131-134.