Home About Us Contact Us
Table of Content Volume 10 Issue 2 - May 2019

 

 

Comparison of morphology and morphometry of human pulmonary and porcine pulmonary heart valves

 

Supadevi S1, Ramesh Kumar Subramaniam2*

 

1Assistant professor, Department of Anatomy, Government Kilpauk Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.

2Professor, Department of Anatomy, Sri Ramachandra Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.

Email: supadevi.dr@gmail.com

 

REFERENCES

  1. Rogers JH, Bolling SF (2009). The tricuspid valve: current perspective and evolving management of tricuspid regurgitation. Circulation; 119: pp 2718- 25.
  2. Kunzelman K.S, Cochran R.P, Verrier E.D and Eberhart R.C (1994a). Anatomic basis for mitral valve modelling.J. Heart valve Dis; 3(5): pp 491-6.
  3. Hughes HC (1986). Swine in cardiovascular research. Laboratory Animal science; 36: pp 348-350.
  4. Crick, SJ. Sheppard, MN., HO., SY, Gebstien, L and Anderson, RH (1998). Anatomy of the pig heart: comparisons with normal cardiac structure. Journal of Anatomy; 193(1): pp 105- 119.
  5. Silver M.A. and Robert, W.C (1985). Detailed anatomy of the normally functioning aortic valve in hears of normal and increased weight. Am. J. Cardiol; 55: pp 454- 461.
  6. Robert Walmsley (1978). Anatomy of human mitral valve in adult cadaver and comparative anatomy of the valve. British Heart journal; 40: pp 351- 366.
  7. Ross, D. N. (1967). Replacment of aortic and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft. Lancet 2; pp 956- 958.
  8. Skwarek .M, J. Hreczecha, M. Dudziak, M. Grzybiak (2006). The morphology of the right atrioventricular valve in the adult human heart. Folia Morphol; 65(3): pp 200-208.
  9. Michael G. bateman, Jason l. Quill, Alexander J.Hill and Paul A. Iaizzo (2013). The anatomy and Function of the semilunar valves. Heart valves; from Design to Clinical Implantation; 10: pp 27-43.
  10. Martin Misfeld and Hans- Hinrichsievers (2007). Heart valve macro- and microstructure. Phil. Trans. R. Soc; 362: pp 1421- 1436.