Home About Us Contact Us
Table of Content Volume 12 Issue 1 - October 2019

 

Comparative study for estimation of fetal weight by using two different ultrasonographical formulae in high risk pregnant patients

 

Rupali S Kavitake*, Mehera Bhoir**

 

*Associate Professor, 2Professor and HOD, Department of Anatomy, H. B. T. Medical College and Dr. R. N. Cooper Municipal General Hospital, Vileparle(west), Mumbai, INDIA.

Email: drrupalikhedu@gmail.com

 

REFERENCES

  1. Campbell S, Wilkin D. Ultrasonic measurement of fetal Abdomen circumference in the estimation of fetal weight. British journal of obstetrics and Gynecology 1975; 82: 689-693.
  2. Campbell S. and Dewhurst, C.J. Lancet 1971; 2: 1002.
  3. Campbell S. Clinics in Obstetric and Gynecology 1973 vol-1 pg no.41. Fetal medicine Edited by R.W.Beard. W.B. Saunders and Co. Ltd. London.
  4. Campbell S. The pregnancy at risk. Clinics in perinatology 1974: vol- 1, No-2 page No. 507 Edited by a Milusky W.B.Saunders and Co. Ltd Philadelphia.
  5. Chervenak FA, Berkowitz GS, Thornton J, Kreiss C, Youcha S, Ehrenkranz RA, Hobbins JC, Berkowitz RL. A comparison of sonographic estimation of fetal weight and obstetrically determined gestational age in the prediction of neonatal outcome for the very low birth weight fetus. AM. J. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152: 47-50.
  6. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body and femur measurements- A prospective study. Am.J. of Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151:333-337.
  7. Key TC, Dattel BJ Resnik R. The ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight in the very low birth weight infant. Am.J.of Obstet Gynecol 1983; 145: 574- 578.
  8. Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, Chu Y, Perin J, Zhu J, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000-15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet. 2016;388(10063):3027.
  1. McCallum WD, Brinkley JF. Estimation of fetal weight from ultrasonic measurements. Am J.of Obstet Gynecol 1979; 133: 195-199.
  2. Medchill MT, Peterson CM, Kreinic C, Garbaciak J. Prediction of estimated fetal weight in extremely low birth weight neonates (500-1000gm). Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 286-290.-39
  3. Rossavik IK, Torjusen GO, Deter RL, Deter MD,Reiter AA. Efficacy of mathematical methods for ultrasound examination in diabetic pregnancies. Am. J. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 638-644.-37
  4. Sabbagha RE, Barton BA, Barton FB, Kingas E, Orgill J, Turner JH. Predictive of three fetal growth patterns leading to a closer assessment of gestational age and neonatal weight. Am. J. of Obstet Gynecol1976; 485-490.-39
  5. Sampson MB, Thomason JL, Kelly SL, Work BA. Predication of intrauterine fetal weight using real- time ultrasound. Am. J. of Obstet Gynecol 1982; 142: 554-556.-41
  6. Shepard MJ, Richards VA, Berkowitz RL. Warsof SL, Hobbins JC. An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound. AM. J. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 142: 47-54.-43
  7. Thurnau GR, Tamura RK, Sabbagha R, Richard O, Dyer A, Larkin R, Lee T, Laughlin C. A simple estimated fetal weight equation based on real time ultrasound measurements of fetuses less than thirty four weeks gestation. AM. J. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 145: 557-561.-46
  8. Varma T.R. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Obstetric and Gynecology; 1973; 13; page No. 19.-47
  9. Willocks J, Donald I, Campbell S and Dunsmore FR, Journal of Obstetric and Gynecology of the British common wealth 1967; 74; 639.-50.