Home About Us Contact Us
Table of Content Volume 12 Issue 1 - October 2019

 

A descriptive study on dermatoglyphics in type II diabetic patients

 

Sudagar Muthusamy1, Ilankathir Sridharan2*, Rajan Thangarasu3, Sridhar Krishnamoorthy4, Sowmiya Ganesan5

 

1,4,5Assistant Professor, 2Associate Professor, 3Professor, Department of Anatomy, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital (Puducherry), Vinayaka Missions Research Foundations, Deemed to be University.

Email: anat9799@gmail.com

 

Abstract               Background: Dermatoglyphic pattern, epidermal ridges found in the fingertips of the palm exhibits in various pattern like whorl, arch and loop. This pattern of arrangement develops by 22nd weeks of intrauterine life and persists all through the life without any change. Among the metabolic disorders available globally, Diabetes mellitus crowns itself to affect the quality of life of humans. Correlation of dermatoglyphic pattern among the diabetic patients may assist the health workers in screening the disorder at an earlier stage among the population. Aim: To study and compare fingertip dermatoglyphic patterns in the male diabetic patients with the female diabetic patients and to find out, whether the specific dermatoglyphic trait exist in the patients of diabetes mellitus and whether it is significant. Materials and Methods: The present study is undertaken with an aim to evaluate the dermatoglyphic features in diabetic patients. The study consists of 290 diabetic patients and were 145 males and 145 females. Dermatoglyphic prints were taken by “Ink Method” described by Cummins and Midlo and further subjected to statistical analysis to find the variations in the dermatoglyphic features among diabetic patients. Results: The Frequency of loop pattern is significantly increased in diabetic males (P<0.001) as compared to female diabetic patients. The frequency of both whorl and arch patterns are significantly increased in female diabetic patients (P<0.001) as compared to male diabetic patients. Conclusion: From the present study, it appears that there exist variations in the dermatoglyphic patterns among diabetic patients with an added advantage of screening through simple and economical ‘ink’ method. As the specific features of dermatoglyphic patterns are present in diabetic patients, it can be used for mass screening program to segregate the predicted diabetic patients.

Key Words: Diabetes, whorl, loop, arch.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

Dermatoglyphics deals with the scientific study of epidermal ridge patterns on the palmar and palmar aspect of finger tips, palms, soles and toes. Diabetes Mellitus is a global disease and the worldwide prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus has risen dramatically over the past two decades from an estimated 30 million cases in 1985 to 177 million in 2000. Based on current trends more than 300 million individuals will have diabetes by the year 2025[4]. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential is preventing long term complications such as retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy. Most sufferers are asymptomatic and hence early diagnosis is a problem. One of the aetiology of diabetes mellitus is hereditary. In this study, we are trying to find out various dermatoglyphic patterns available bilaterally and in varying sex. Dermatoglyphics may be effectively employed as a screening procedure in the early detection of diabetes mellitus soon.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The Present study was carried out in the Department of Anatomy, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry after getting permission from Research and Ethical Committee of Institution. Study sample consisted of 290 Diabetic patients including both 145 males and 145 females, between the age group ranging from 45 to 70 yrs. The study population included all clinically diagnosed Type II diabetic patients confirmed by investigations and all Type I diabetics, systemic diseases, metabolic syndrome (excluding type II diabetics), chromosomal abnormalities were excluded from the study. The study population were from the Kirumampakkam and surrounding area. Dermatoglyphic prints were taken by “ink method” as described by Cummins (1936) and Cummins and Midlo 1 (1943). After getting informed consent, the subjects were asked to clean their hands with soap and water. They were also asked to dry their hands but to leave some moisture. The requisite amount of ink daub is placed on the glass slab and is uniformly spread by the rubber roller to get a thin even ink film on the glass slab. The thin film of ink will be applied by passing the inked rubber roller uniformly over the palm of both hands. The palms will be examined for the uniformity of the ink. Palm of left hand of the subject will be then placed on the sheet of paper (Kept over the pressure pad) and will be gently pressed from proximal to distal end. The tip of the fingers are rolled from the radial to ulnar side to include all patterns. The same procedure will be repeated for right hand on a separate paper. The print obtained (Photograph 1) will be analyzed for the varying in pattern and tabulations of data were made. The data obtained for were tabulated and analyzed statistically in both the sexes and both the sides. The results were analyzed statistically, by Chi-square test. P value of < 0.05 was considered for Statistical significance. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 19 and Microsoft Excel 2007.

OBSERVATION AND RESULT

12
Photograph 1:
Showing palmar print of right and left hand of male patient

Table 1: Shows the percentagewise distribution of finger tip pattern in male and female diabetic patients

Fingertip pattern

Male(n=145)

Female(n=145)

Right

(n=725)

%

Left

(n=725)

%

Right

(n=725)

%

Left

(n=725)

%

Loop

336

46

327

45

268

37

261

36

Whorl

242

33

272

38

290

40

329

45

Arch

147

21

126

17

167

23

135

19

 

Table 2: Shows the statistical comparison of different finger tip pattern between male and female diabetic patients

 

Finger tip pattern

Diabetic Patients

 

X2

 

P value

 

 

Remark

 

Male

Female

No.

%

No.

%

Loop

663

46

529

36

18.43

0.001

S

Whorl

514

35

619

43

22.66

0.001

S

Arch

273

19

302

21

19.36

0.001

S

 


DISCUSSION

In the present study, frequency of loops in male type II diabetic patients is significantly increased as compared to female diabetic patients which is similar to the study of Anju Bala et al [2016]5 and Roopa Ravindranath et al (1995) 18. The whorl pattern is also found to be significantly increased in female diabetics when compared to male diabetics in both hands in the present study, which is similar to the study of Manoj Kumar Sharma et al [2012] 8 Sant SM et al (1980), Li Yanhua Wu Shoushan Han et al (1990) 15, Shariatzadeh S.M.A et al (2002) 14, Hossein Rezaei Nezhad and Nasser Mahdavi Shah (2010) 10 and Sarthak Sengupta and Jina Boruah (1996) 18. The decrease frequency of whorl in male diabetic patients of our present study coincides with Roopa Ravindranath et al (1995) 18 who reported decrease frequency of whorl pattern in male diabetic patients. Julian L. Verbov (1973) 17, Sant SM et al (1980), and M Pramila Padmini et al (2011) 7 observed increase frequency of arches in diabetic females. Thus, the finding of increase frequency of arch pattern in diabetic females in the present study coincides with the findings of above workers.

 

CONCLUSION

From the present study, it appears that there do exists a variations in the dermatoglyphic patterns in diabetic patients. This study has an advantage of being simple and economical as it uses ‘ink’ method. If the specific features of dermatoglyphic patterns are present in diabetic patients, it can be use for mass screening program to segregate the predicted diabetic patients. Thus this can decrease the morbidity and mortality rate caused by diabetes mellitus

 

REFERENCES

  1. Cummins H and Midlo. Palmar and plantar epidermal configurations (dermatoglyphics) in European Americans. American J Physical Anthropology. 1926; 9:471-502.
  2. Penros LS. Finger prints, palms and chromosomes. Ann Hwn Genet. 1963; 197:933-938.
  3. Cummins H, Midlo. Finger prints of palms and soles. An introduction to dermatoglyphics. 1943; Dovar Pub. INC, New York.
  4. Park K.Park’s textbook of preventive and social medicine. 21st ed. 2007, Bhanot Publishers: 302-13.
  5. Anju Bala, Arvind Deswal, P C Sarmah, Bidita Khandelwal and Binod Kumar Tamang. Comparative Study of Dermatoglyphic Patterns of Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetic with Hypertension Patients of Hilly Region.2016 DOI: 10.17354
  6. M Pramila Padmini, B Narasinga Rao and B Malleswari. The Study of Dermatoglyphics in Diabetics of North Coastal Andhra Pradesh Population. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences 2011 ISSN: 2231-6345
  7. Manoj Kumar Sharma, Hemlata Sharma. Dermatoglyphics: A Diagnostic Tool to Predict Diabetes DOI: JCDR/2012/3551:2059
  8. Dr.Karim J. Karim, A.L.Mohammed A. Saleem. Dermatoglyphics Study of Finger Prints Pattern’s Variations of a Group of Type II Diabetic Mellitus Patients in Erbil City Zanco Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences Vol.26, No.4, 2014
  9. HosseinRezaeiNezhad, Nasser Mahdavi Shah. Applications of dermatoglyphics traits for diagnosis of diabetic type 1 patients. Int j EnvirSci Dev. 2010;1:36-39
  10. Udoaka A.L and K lawyer-Egbe. Dermatoglyphic patterns of diabetic patients of ljaw origin in Port Hartcourt, Nigeria. Nigerian j Health and Biomed Sci.2009; 8(2).
  11. Ana Tarca. Dermatoglyphics in diabetes mellitus of type 2 (T2DM) or Non-Insulin dependent j preventive Med. 2006; 14: 60-70.
  12. Barta L, RegolyMereiA,KammererL.Dermatoglyphic features is diabetes mellitus. 2006, PMID: 665221.
  13. Shariatzadeh S.M.A, Madhavi Shahri N, Soleymani M. Quantitative and Quantitative study of Dermatoglyphics patterns in IDDM in Markazi Province. Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Science, 2002; 5(14): 82- 88.
  14. Li Yanhua Wu Shoushan Han Li Guo Qingmei He Liping. Dermatoglyphics study of 210 patients with diabetes mellitus. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 1990; 3: 6.
  15. Hossein Rezaei Nezhad and Nasser Mahdavi Shah. Application of Dermatoglyphics Traits for Diagnosis of Diabetic Type 1 Patients. International Journal of Environmental Sciences and Development, 2010; 1(1): 36-39.
  1. Julian L. Verbov (1973). Dermatoglyphics in early onset diabetes mellitus. Human Heredity, 1973; 23:535-542.
  1. Sarthak Sengupta and Jina Boruah (1996). Finger Dermatoglyphic Pattern in Diabetes mellitus. J Hum Ecol, 1996; 7(3): 203-06.
  2. Roopa Ravindranath,Thomas IM. Finger ridge count and finger print pattern in maturity onset diabetes mellitus. Indian J Med Sci.1995; 49:153–156.