Home About Us Contact Us

Official Journals By StatPerson Publication

Table of Content Volume 12 Issue 2 - November 2019

 

A study of human behaviour (KAP factors) in relation to family planning in reproductive age group (15-49) women in Chittur-Tattamangalam municipality

 

C Velayutham

 

Community medicine Department, Karuna Medical College, Vilayodi, Chittur, Palakkad.

Email: drcvelayutham@yahoo.co.in

 

Abstract               Background: To study the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of contraception among in reproductive age group women (15—45) in Chittur-Tattamangalam municipality (Kerala). This is a qualitative assessment of KAP for the use of family planning methods in a community. As the various factors which influence the acceptance of family planning methods, this study was conducted to explore and to guide us to have corrective measures for the above. Methodology: A study of human behavior (KAP) in community based cross sectional descriptive 30 cluster study has been conducted in municipal area by using structured open ended interviewed questionnaire method. Random house to house survey has been taken after getting prior concern from the respondents and adopted ethics. . Study population: 1200 house hold couples women in reproductive age group. Study period: February 2018 to May 2018. The collected data has been analyzed by using latest version of SPSS method. Results: Surveyed total population 5172 (16% of the total census- population of study area), 1144 eligible couples and 436 protected couples. Age at marriage (21-25) age = 54%, age at first child (21-25) = 59.7%. Couple protection: (21-35) age group = 85%, (26-30) age group 43.5%. Respondent: – awareness about FP method 76.79 %, no need of early child after marriage 77.3 %, two child enough 52.2%, want of child after 2 years 30 %,want of child after 3 years 35 %. Knowledge about FP benefit: 63.96%. Know the source of FP service in govt - hospital 57.23%. Side effects 40-63%. FP service satisfaction 53.8%. Family size (3-5): wife parental 66% and in laws 52%. Service utility: Private hospital 60-70%. Sex preference: Husband 41.25%, female 29.84%, male 28.97%.Mother in law- female 22.25%, male 37.91%.

Key Words: KAP relationship to FP- Reproductive age group – Municipal area-

 

INTRODUCTION

India’s population is 121 crore, second only to China for account of world population. The family planning program launched in the world in 1952. The program has evolved from a targeted approach to a target free approach. The state of Kerala had a high population density of state one, but state’s policies and program placed a larger role in bringing about the rapid transition in fertility. The practice of traditional methods of birth control was more prominent in Kerala as in the rest of the continent. Social and cultural practices, moral and taboos existed in the state to regulate fertility. The official FP program in Kerala, as in rest of India was introduced only by the middle of the fifties. From a level of near zero, the ever use FP methods in Kerala, has reached a level as high as 75%. Implementation of FP program in Kerala has already completed the last stage demographic transition, as demographic indicators are nearly equal to that of a developed country.


Chittur-Tattamangalam Municipality area, Kerala-- Family planning achievement:

Year

Sterilization

Pills

IUD

Condom

CPR

2015

67

5

140

21

 

2016

48

4

180

30

 

2017

32

1

143

37

62.23%

This data has shown apparently poor performance and hypothetically and clearly needs a detailed study on human behaviour (KAP factors) in reproductive age group couples.

 

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE

Aim: The state of Kerala, has shown high performance of demographic indicators which are nearly equal the developed country. To achieve this, increased facilities are being provided for FP program in all sections of the society. Even such situation, the municipality performance apparently shows as poor. Hence the human behaviour (KAP) in relation to FP program study has been conducted.

Objective: To find out the extent of human behaviour (KAP factors) in relation to FP program in reproductive age group (15- 49) couples.

 

DATA ANALYSIS AND OBSERVATION

The study area 1200 house hold has covered 16% (5172) of the population to the census 2011 (32298). Among the population, the available total ECs are 1144 and FP user couples are 721 (63 %) and non-user are 37 %.

 

Table 1: User of FP methods in study population (Total EC=1144)

Type of family planning methods

Use FP methods

N

%

Oral pills

83

7.25

IUD

86

7.51

Sterilization (female)

436

38.11

Condom (male)

116

10.13

 Total 721 63.02 Total E C =1144 --- user 721= 63%. Non-user = 37%.

 

Table No 2 – Total eligible couple 1144. Among them 635 (55.5 %) are 15-35 age group. At the same age group, 417 (65.67 %) are sterilized with 1 to 4 child. Total sterilization 491. It is 43 % to the total EC and 85 % to the total achievement in the same age group (15-35). Sterilization with 1st child (147) 30 %, 2nd child (259) 52.7 %, 3rd child (66) 13.4 % and 4th child (19) 3.9 %. = (83 % with 1st + 2nd child and 17 % with 3rd +4th child)

 

Table 2: Distribution of Eligible couples / Protected couples (parity wise)

Age group

Eligible couples (Numbers)

Eligible couples %

Protected couples(N) 1st child

Protected couples(N) 2nd child

Protected couples(N) 3rd child

Protected couples(N) 4th child

15-20

6

0.50

3

0

0

0

21-25

110

9.60

46

34

5

1

26-30

260

22.70

55

128

26

5

31-35

259

22.60

26

58

23

7

36-40

198

17.30

9

23

5

4

41-45

150

13.11

3

6

3

1

46-49

161

14.07

5

10

4

1

Total

1144

 

147

259

66

19

Table No 3 – The spacing duration in pregnancy (in parity wise) has calculated roughly for period of 3 years (0-1, 1-2, 2-3) .The average spacing duration (in months) for 1st child =22, 2nd child =27, 3rd child =28 and 4th child 29. Overall average spacing duration = 26.5. The 1st and 2nd child births are account for spacing duration =1073 +758 (53 +37.5= 90.5 %) and 3rd and 4th child births are account for = 168+25 (8.3 +1.2= 9.5 %). This shows that the occurrence of birth order is remarkably reduced in 3rd and 4th and adoption of FP methods.

 

Table 3: Spacing of duration of Pregnancy / Child births

Child

< 1year (N) /M

%

1-2year (N) /M

/%

2-3year (N) /M

%

3+ year (N)

%

Marriage to 1st child

291 -3492

24.2

633 - 15192

52.8

98 - 3528

8.2

51

4.2

1st to 2nd child

37 444

3.1

301 7224

25.1

174 6264

14.5

246

20.5

2nd to 3rd child

5 60

0.4

70 1680

5.8

52 1872

4.3

43

3.63

3rd to 4th child

2 24

0.2

7 168

0.6

10 360

0.8

6

0.5

N = Number of child =1st 1073, 2nd =758, 3rd =168, 4th = 25 M = months

Table No 4 – shows that 88 % couple’s marriage are taken at the age group of 15-25 and among them 74 % of couples have their 1st child in the same age group. Early age group (15-20), - age at marriage is 34 % and 1st child birth is 14 %.

 

Table 4: Distribution of Couples of Age group at marriage / Age group at 1st Child in study population

Couples age group

Age at marriage. Numbers.

Age at marriage. Percentage. (%)

Age at 1st Child. Numbers.

Age at 1st Child. Percentage. (%).

15-20

407

33.9

171

14.2

21-25

648

54.0

716

59.7

26-30

121

10.1

269

22.4

31-35

24

2.0

35

2.9

36-40

0

0

8

0.7

41-45

0

0

1

0.1

46-49

0

0

0

0

Total

1200

 

1200

 

Table 5, 5A, shows more than 76-79% of respondents are have the knowledge about FP programme (pills, condom -male and female) and 65-71% of respondents are known FP information from the source of health care provider (65.6%), relatives (67.2%), Media (71%) and advertisement (66.75%). The attitude and practice of the respondents: Need of child: no need of child early 3 years after marriage (77.3%), two child enough (52.2%), want of child after 2 year (30%), want of child after 3year (35%). To know the baby sex: in 1st pregnancy (17.92%), 2nd pregnancy (11%), 3rd pregnancy (7%). Baby Sex preference: Husband: any child (41.25%), female (29.84%) male (28.92%).Mother-in-low female (22.25%), male (37.91%) and (63 – 76%) of the respondents are known the benefits of family planning and only 57%, 50 % of the respondents are knowing the service availability in government and private in respectively. Only 3 side effects (vomiting, abnormal menstruation and unwanted weight gain) are taken for study. The respondent’s response for NO = (40 – 63%) and the FP service satisfaction 53.8%.The respondent shown response for (both category persons- wife’s parental and in-lows) 3-5 member family size 66% and 52% in respectively. The service utility of the respondents in case of ANC check-up, delivery care and immunization – (60-70%) from private hospital and (30-40 %) from govt.-hospital.

 

Table 5: KAP factors in relationship to Family Planning

S.No

Variables

YES

YES

NO

NO

 

 

NO

%

NO

%

1

Type of FP methods (Knowledge)

 

 

 

 

 

(a) Oral pills

945

78.8

255

21.2

 

(b) IUD

915

76.2

285

23.8

 

(c) male condom

920

76.6

280

23.8

2

Source of information

 

 

 

 

 

(a) Health care provider

787

65.6

413

34.4

 

(b) Advertisement

801

66.75

399

33.25

 

(c) Relative

807

67.2

393

32.8

 

(d) Media

852

71

348

29

3

Need of child

 

 

 

 

 

(a) Early 3 years after marriage

927

77.3

272

22.7

 

(b) Two child enough

627

52.2

573

47.75

 

(c) Want of another child – 2years later

369

30.75

831

69.25

 

(d) Want of another child –3 years later

420

35

780

65

4

Try to know sex of the baby

 

 

 

 

 

(a) during 1st pregnancy

215

17.92

985

82.08

 

(b) during 2nd pregnancy

132

11

1068

89

 

(c) during 3rd pregnancy

84

7

1116

93

5

Service availability (known as)

 

 

 

 

 

(a) Govt.

687

57.25

513

42.75

 

(b) Private

610

50.83

590

49.16

6

Service utility in govt. health centre

 

 

 

 

 

(a) ANC check up

372

31

828

69

 

(b) Delivery care

362

30.16

838

69.83

 

(c) Immunization

487

38.9

733

61.08

Table 5A: KAP factors in relationship to Family Planning

S.No

Variables

YES /no

YES / %

No/ no

NO /%

7

Side-effects

 

 

 

 

 

(a) Vomiting

446

37.16

754

62.83

 

(b) Abnormal menstruation

443

36.91

487

40.58

 

(c) Unwanted weight gain

441

36.75

759

63.25

8

Service satisfaction

642

53.5

558

46.5

9

Service benefits

 

 

 

 

 

(a) limits the pregnancy

921

76.75

279

23.25

 

(b) to avoid the pregnancy

889

74

311

25.91

 

(c) prevent abortion

836

69.6

364

30.33

 

(d) prevent maternal death

824

68.6

376

31.33

 

(e) mother health

840

70

360

30

 

(f) family health

823

68.58

377

31.41

 

(g) country development

761

63.41

439

36.58

10

Sex preference

 

 

 

 

 

Husband’s – (a) Female

358

29.84

 

 

 

(b) male

347

28.92

 

 

 

(c) no

478

39.84

 

 

 

Mother-in-law’s (a) female

267

22.25

 

 

 

(b) male

455

37.91

 

 

11

Family size preference

3-5 size

6 -8 size

+9 size

 

 

 

No / %

No / %

No / %

 

 

(a) Wife parental

793 / 66.08

386/ 32.16

21/ 1.75

 

 

(b) In laws

628/ 52.33

439/ 36.58

133/11.08

 

 


DISCUSSION

This KAP study area (Municipality) results are compared with others study results of rural (R1) / village (R2) / urban slum (R3) / semi urban (R5) / and tertiary care institute (R4) area’s reports. This study covers 16 % (5172) of population with 1144 couples. Among them 721 (63 %) couples are using any one of family planning methods (Female sterilisation 43 % ,oral pills 7.25 %, IUD 7.5 % , condom 10.13 %). But the recorded FP coverage shows 53 % in rural (R1) and 44.5 % in urban slum (R3). These areas oral pills, IUD, condom and sterilisation – all are higher coverage when compare to the study area. This might be due to the low sample size. Among in the study couples (1144), at the age group (15- 20) have accounts for 34 % of marriage and their 1st child birth 14 % , and also at the age group (15-25) couples have their marriage and their 1st child birth are 88 % and 74 % in respectively. The spacing duration for the 1s, 2nd, 3rd and 4th child have observed as 22, 27, 28, and 29 months. The average I s 26.5 months. At the same time, the couple protection (sterilisation) has observed as 83 % and 17 %, with 2 child and 3-4child in respectively. The FP awareness (sterilisation / pills / IUD /condom) in this study has observed 76-79 % of couples. It has compared with rural (R1) – (76-98 %) and institution care study (R4) – (79-86 %) which seems as almost similar and with village study (R2) seems poor awareness. The source of FP information in the study area has observed (66 -71 %) mainly from health care providers, relatives, advertisement and media, But it has observed at the rural area (R1) mainly from ASHA (94 %), health staffs (64 %), media (58 %)) and relatives (60 %). At the same time it seems as poor (friends and relatives 16- 44 %, media 22 %) in the village (R2) and in urban slum (R5) – (media, TV, Net, news-paper) are helped only 19 -54 % of level as source of information. The availability of FP service in Govt. / Private was known by couples only 57 % and 51 % respectively and the utility of service like ANC / Delivery / Immunization in Govt. was only 31 % , 30 % and 39 % in respectively. Almost all couples are taking health care service from private. The couple’s attitude of need of child in this study observed as (i) 3 years after marriage (77 % ) , (ii) two child enough (52 %) ,(iii) want of another child 2 years later, 3 years later (35 %) , (iv) try to know sex of the baby during 1st pregnancy (18%), 2nd pregnancy (11 %), 3rd pregnancy (7 % ). The sex preference was observed from husband and mother- in –law and it was for female 30 % and 22 % and for male 29 % and 38 % in respectively.. The study area couples parental and in –laws are likely to have the family size (3- 5) –66 % and 52 % in respectively. The side effects knowledge due to FP felt by the couples in this study area – vomiting, abnormal menstruation and unwanted weight (37%).

 

CONCLUSION

  1. The couples FP awareness and their usage is 79 % and 63 %.
  2. The family size is 4.3 (5172 / 1200)
  3. Couples marriage: at the age group (15- 20) – 34 % and (15- 25) – 88 %.                                 
  4. Couples 1st child birth: -- at the age group (15 -20)—14 % and (15- 25) – 74 %.                    
  5. Couple protection: - with 2 child -- 83 % and 3- 4 child – 17 %.       
  6.  Spacing pregnancy duration for 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th child – 22, 27, 28 and 29 months in respectively. Average: 26.5 months.
  7. Source of information (FP) from health
  8.  Service utility from Govt. – 30 – 40 %.
  9. Need of Child: two child enough 52 %.  
  10. Sex preference: -- Try to know the sex of baby only 7- 18 % of couples and sex preference from husband 30 % (female), mother –in- law 38 % (male).

 

RECOMMENDATION

In this study area, the female education is more than 99 % and it is also observed that the couples early marriage, early child birth and early couple protection – all these are completed 15- 30 age group. So in this area, most of the couples are completing their reproductive period life / problem before the age of 30 years. The remaining life span period more than 30 years, the huge man power should be utilised in a productive way of economic condition to improve welfare of the family members and children. So necessary vocational training should be given to those human power and put them into job to earn more. Action: -- District Health officer, Municipal commissioner.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Mohammad Jawed Quereishi , , Ann Kavitha Mathew, Ashish Sinha – wledge, Attitude and Practices of family planning methods among the rural females of Bagbahara block Mahasamund district in Chhattishgarh state India.—ISSN#2277-9604. Global journal of Medicine and Public health
  2. J. Mao – Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of family planning. –A study of Tezu Village,Manipur (India). – The Internet Journal of Biological Anthropology. – 2006, volume 1, Number 1.
  3. Sumedha M. Joshi, Shirish B.Patil – Knowledge and Practices of family planning in an urban slum of Mumbai- India. Indian Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine. Volume 38, No 1, Issue 2, 2007
  4. B M Sindhu, M. M. Angadi – Knowledge, Attitude and Practice about family planning methods among reproductive age group women in a Tertiary care Institute. International journal of Scientific Study – May 2016, volume 4, issue 2.
  5. Poonam Kashyap and Sudha Prasad.—Assessing the Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Contraception in Semi-Urban area in India: A Qualitative assessment of Contraceptive usage. ISSN no 2319 -5886.International journal of Medical Research Health Sciences, 2018, 7(10), 150-154.