Home About Us Contact Us

Official Journals By StatPerson Publication

Table of Content - Volume 11 Issue 3 - September 2019

 

 

A study on tracheostomy and its indications amongst patients admitted at tertiary care teaching hospital, Bellary, Karnataka, India

 

Sher Khan1, Arun Ingale2*

 

1Senior Resident, 2Assistant Professor, Department of Otorhinolaryngology (ENT), Gadag Institute of Medical Sciences, Gadag, Karnataka, INDIA

Email: aruningalekims@gmail.com

 

Abstract               Background: Tracheostomy is one of the oldest operations that performed as a life saving procedure and it is commonly performed for various indications and different age group. This study designed to review the indications of tracheostomy and the age group commonly involved in ENT Department at VIMS, Bellary, Karnataka. Methods: A case series study of 75 tracheostomised patients carried out from December 2014 to May 2016, at Department of ENT of Vijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences, Bellary, Karnataka. Data was entered in MS Excel sheet and were analyzed in the form of percentage and proportions whenever necessary. Results: Upper airway obstruction was the most common indication for tracheostomy. Airway obstruction caused by tumor, trauma and infection. Tracheostomy performed for prolonged ventilation was the 2nd common indication and involved commonly age group 21-40 years. It was caused by trauma, snake bite, systemic diseases like cerebrovascular accident, infection, and organophosphorus poisoning. Conclusion: The most common indication for tracheostomy was upper airway obstruction due to malignancy, trauma, prolonged ventilation and infections respectively.

Key Words: Tracheostomy, Decannulation, Laryngotracheal trauma, Fazio Londe disease

 

 

INTRODUCTION

The word “Trachea” is derived from the Greek Language and originally meant rough. Other names for the trachea included “Arteria aspera”. The early history of tracheostomy starts with Galen and Aretaeus, both of whom referred to either cutting the larynx or making an incision in the arteria aspera. The earliest known references to tracheostomy are made in the Rigveda, a sacred Hindu book, published around 2000 BC.1 The term Tracheotomy is used to refer to the creation of a surgical opening into the trachea. Tracheostomy is used to describe the creation of a stoma at the skin surface which leads in to the trachea.2 Tracheostomy is a life-saving procedure as quoted by Johannes Scultetus (1595–1645) in his book “Armamentarium Chirurgicum” when performed with an appropriate indication and surgical technique.3,4 In the past tracheostomy used to be reserved for severely ill patient with acute respiratory obstruction; gradually the indications for tracheostomy have been widened to include tracheobronchial toileting, intermittent positive pressure ventilation, protection against inhalation of foreign body and reduction of dead space, anaesthetic indications.5 In the recent years more and more airway problems are managed with either endotracheal intubation or percutaneous endoscopically guided tracheostomy..6 But in our country percutaneous endoscopically guided tracheostomy is not yet routinely practiced, conventional tracheostomy is practiced in vast majority of cases to manage airway problems. A conventional subhyoid tracheostomy is performed. The advances in critical care in the last half of the twentieth century have made prolonged mechanical ventilation the leading indication for tracheotomy in the current era.7 Tracheostomy in the pediatric age group has been reported to be different from that in adults because in pediatric patients this procedure is challenging and technically more demanding and carries higher degree of morbidity and mortality when compared to the adult population.8 The procedure of traditional tracheostomy is associated with numerous complications which may occur anytime during the operative and postoperative periods.9,10 These complications are more common in emergency traditional tracheostomy than in elective ones.9 Complication rates associated with tracheostomy have been reported in literature to range from 6% to 66% and the mortality rate related to tracheostomy is reported to be <2%.10 Complications and mortality associated with tracheostomy are mostly avoidable if the procedure is carefully performed and the postoperative management strictly and conscientiously followed.11 With this background the present study is being performed to assess the current indications with respect to age and also demographic and pathological causes with respect to age, in our hospital in the present scenario. Hence the present study was carried out to study the common indications of the tracheostomy among the patients admitted in tertiary care teaching hospital, Bellary, Karnataka.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional descriptive study was done in 75 cases of tracheostomies at Department of Otorhinolaryngology (ENT) of Vijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences (VIMS), Bellary, Karnataka from the period of December 2014 to May 2016. Patients depending on indications, tracheostomy was done on both elective and emergency basis. Selected patients are subjected to investigations preoperative and postoperative like X-ray soft tissue neck lateral view, X-ray chest PA View, Routine Blood and Urine examination, Indirect Laryngoscopy, Video Laryngoscopy., DL Scopy and Biopsy. CT Scan Neck with Contrast.

Inclusion Criteria: Patients of both sex and all age groups presenting with stridor.

1. All patients with stridor at rest were done tracheostomy on emergency basis.

2. Patients with stridor on exertion were evaluated initially and tracheostomy was done later.

3. Patients on tracheal intubation for more than one week.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Tracheostomy done in other hospital and then referred to VIMS, Bellary, Karnataka.

METHODOLOGY

All the patients have undergone standard surgical tracheostomy procedure in Operation Theater depending upon the indication. All the selected patients who underwent standard tracheostomy procedure were given intensive care for the first 48 hours post-operatively a cuffed portex tracheostomy tube was used in all cases, later the tube changed to Jacksons tracheostomy tube. In the post operative ward, tracheostomy care was given by the surgeon and the attending nurse, while the patient’s care giver was asked to observe the same. In the ward tracheostomy care was done once in the morning and again in the evening. In the interval period patient’s care giver was taught the same. If patient was to be discharged with tracheostomy tube insitu, then the Portex tube was changed to Jackson’s tube.

Regular follow up of the patients was done as follows:

  • Twice a week for first month.
  • Once a week for second month.
  • Monthly twice in the third month and finally whenever patient has any problems, he/she was asked to come for follow up.
  • During follow up in Minor OT, inspection of the tracheostomy tube, cleaning and dressing was done. Advice was given as required. When the tracheostomy was no longer required the tube was occluded for 24 hrs to confirm the adequacy of the laryngeal airway. The tube was then removed and an air tight dressing applied.

Data was entered in MS Excel sheet and were analyzed in the form of percentage and proportions whenever necessary.

 

RESULTS

As shown in Table 1 that out of 75 study subjects, majority of them were in age group of above sixty years and very few are in pediatric age group and two third of study subjects were males and one third being female. As Table 2 shows that majority of tracheostomy performed are emergency types done under local aneasthesia using vertical type of incision among the study subjects. In our study, most common indication of tracheostomy was found to be upper airway obstruction, followed by prolonged ventilation (As shown in Table 3). Among upper airway obstruction patients, majority of them had presented with tumor mass, followed by trauma and infections (As shown in Table 4) and Out of the 9 study subjects who under went tracheostomy as part of another procedure, trauma was the commonst presentation (As shown in Table 5)

Table 1: Distribution of study subjects according to age and gender

Variable

Frequency

(n=75)

Percentage

Age group

 

0-10 yrs

03

4.0

11-20 yrs

02

2. 6

21-30 yrs

07

9.3

31-40 yrs

17

22.5

41-50 yrs

11

14.7

51-60 yrs

14

18.7

Above 60 yr

21

28

Gender

 

Male

58

77.3

Female

17

22.7

 

Table 2: Distribution of study subjects according to type of tracheostom

Variable

Frequency

(n=75)

Percentage

Type of tracheostomy

 

Emergency

54

72.0

Elective

21

28.0

Type of aneasthesia

 

General

26

34. 6

Local

49

65.4

Type of incision

 

Vertical

18

24. 6

Horizontal

57

75.4

 

Table 3: Indications of tracheostomy

Indications

Frequency

(n=75)

Percentage

Upper airway obstruction

48

63.3

Prolonged ventilation

19

26.3

Part of other surgeries

09

10.4

 

Table 4: Indications of tracheostomy under upper airway obstruction

Upper airway obstruction

Frequency

(n=48)

Percentage

Tumor

27

78.95

Trauma

11

13.16

Infection

08

5.26

Fazio Londe disease

02

2.63

 

Table 5: Causes of tracheostomy as a part of another procedure and protection of airway

Causes

No. of patients

(n=9)

Percentage

Trauma

08

88.88

Laryngeal cyst

01

11.12

 

 DISCUSSION

Tracheostomy is a life-saving procedure as quoted by Johannes Scultetus (1595–1645) in his book “Armamentarium Chirurgicum” when performed with an appropriate indication and surgical technique.3,4 In our study, over all 75 patients were included as study subjects, with a study period of 18months,the socio-demographic profile suggests elderly age-group i.e. from 40 to 60 yrs (51.2%) and above 60 yrs were in majority, with more of male predilection due to high incidence of laryngeal and other head and neck malignancies which is found similar to study conducted by chandrika et al12 and Deepa R.et al13, Crysalde WS et al14. The surgical technique employed in all our patients was the transverse skin crease incision in the operating room. This is the method preferred by us whether it is an emergency or an elective tracheostomy because of the advantage of a better cosmetic result though, the vertical incision has the advantage of running in the line of the trachea, and it is easy to perform and less vascular.similar to a Nigerian study done by B.S.Alabi et al15 but in contrast with chandrika et al12 and Deepa R.et al13 The most common indication in our study was found to be upper airway obstruction (63.4%), secondary to malignancy (78.3%) which is comparable with studies which is comparable with studies by few other.14,16 These malignancy preferred site was found to be supraglottic mass (42%) followed by pyiform sinus mass (21.3%) and glottis mass (9%). This finding is similar to study by Mahadevan M et al17 Higher incidence of laryngeal carcinoma in our study may also be due to the increase in the incidence of laryngeal cancer in our society due to increased consumption of tobacco and alcohol. This finding is in agreement with studies by various other authors.14,17 In our study female patients who had malignancies were found to have oral cavity, postcricoid and thyroid malignancies. The surgical technique employed in most of our emergency patients was vertical incision in the operation theatre as vertical incision has the advantage of running in the line of the trachea and it is easy to perform with less bleeding. This is in variance with other authors who reported use of horizontal incision more than vertical.13, 16, 17

 

CONCLUSION

In our study, the predominant age group who underwent tracheostomy was 61-70 years with a male preponderance. The most common indication for tracheostomy was upper airway obstruction due to malignancy, trauma, prolonged ventilation and infections respectively. In our study emergency tracheostomy was more in number than elective one. Emergency procedure was predominantly done under local anaesthesia using vertical incision.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Roland D. Eavey, M.D. “The evolution of tracheotomy” chapter 1, Tracheotomy. 1st edition. Churchill living stone 1985. pg 1-12.
  2. Thompson JA et al. Posterior tracheal wall perforation during percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Chest 1999;115:1383-89.
  3. .Ilçe Z, Celayir S, Tekand GT, Murat NS, Erdoǧan E, Yeker D, et al. Tracheostomy in childhood: 20 years experience from a pediatric surgery clinic. Pediatr Int. 2002;44:306–09.
  4. Wood DE. Tracheostomy. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 1996;6:749–64.
  5. Me Clelland RMA, Complications of trachesotomy. British Medical Journal. 1965;2:567-69.
  6. Watkinson JC, Gaze MN, Wilson J.A. Treatment options: the principles of surgery. In Stell and Maran’s Head and Meek Surgery. Butter worth- Heinemann. Reed educational and professional publishing Ltd. Oxford 2000. Page 49-65.
  7. Shannon M Kraft, Joshua Schindler “Tracheotomy” chapter 7, Cummings Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 6th edition, 2015 by Saunders, an Imprint of Elsevier Inc pp 95-103
  8. Adoga AA, Ma’an ND. Indications and outcome of pediatric tracheostomy: Results from a Nigerian tertiary hospital. BMC Surg. 2010;10:215.
  9.  Hadi A, Ikram M. Upper airway obstruction: Comparison of tracheostomy and endotracheal intubation. PJLO. 1995;11:25.
  10.  Asmatullah I, Rasool G, Billah M. Complications of emergency tracheostomy. J Postgrad Med Inst. 2004;18:225–29.
  11.  Onakoya PA, Nwaorgu OG, Adebusoye LA. Complications of classical tracheostomy and management. Trop Doct. 2003;33:148–50.
  12. Chandrika A, Somaraj S, Karat A. A descriptive study on complications of tracheostomy. J.Evid. Based Med.Healthc 2016; 3 (99), 5451-57
  13. Ashwin Menon M, Deepa R, Balakrishnan E, Aswin Mukundan, Anupama Anisseril. Tracheostomy: A hospital based descriptive study. MedPulse International Journal of ENT. 2017;1(2):31-39.
  14. Crysalde WS, Fieldman RI, Natio K. Tracheostomies: a 10 year experience in 319 children Ann Otol RhinoLaryngology 1988: 97: 439-443
  15. B.S. Alabi et al.Indications and outcome of tracheostomy in Ilorin, North Central Nigeria: 10 years review,Ann Afr Med. 2018;17(1):1-6.
  16. Amusa Yb, Akinpelu VO, Fadiora SO, Agbabakwuru EA. Tracheostomy in surgical practice: experience in a Nigerian tertiary hospital. West Afr J Med. 2004;23(l):32-4.
  17. Mahadevan M Barber C, Salkeld L. et al Paediatric Tracheostomy 17 year review. Int J Paediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007:71(12):1829-35