Home About Us Contact Us

 

Table of Content - Volume 14 Issue 2 - May 2020

 

A study of management of ovarian tumours at tertiary health care centre

 

Ganesh Tondage1, Pushpadant Rugge2*

 

1Associate professor and HOD, 2Junior resident, Department of OBGY, Swami Ramanand Teerth Government Medical College, Ambajogai, Beed, Maharashtra, INDIA.

Email: pushpadantich@gmail.com

 

Abstract               Background: Ovarian cancer is the sixth most common cancer in female and second most common gynaecological malignancy with the highest mortality rate of all gynaecological malignancy and the overall 5-year survival rate is 46%. An important cause for this high mortality is the extensive disease at the time of diagnosis which makes it important to characterize these lesions early in its course. Aim and objective: To study the management of patients with ovarian tumours at a tertiary health care centre Methodology: This study was carried out over a period of 2 years from 2013 to 2015 and includes 60 patients with ovarian tumour. Data was collected with pretested questionnaire. Data included sociodemographic data, clinical history and clinical examination. Management was done as per type of ovarian tumours. The complications of ovarian tumour were observed. Data analysed with appropriate statistical tests. Results: The incidence of ovarian tumour was 5.92%. In the study 65% were benign tumours, whereas 35% were malignant. Most common mode of management of ovarian tumour was cystectomy (44.82%).
Keywords: ovarian tumours.

 

INTRODUCTION

Ovary is the vital organ concerned with the reproductive capacity of the individual. Ovarian tumours are common form of neoplasms in women accounting for about 30% of genital tract tumours. Ovarian tumour is the 6th most common cancer in humans and most frequent cause of death in gynaecological cancer. About 70% tumours occur in reproductive age group. Ovarian cancer is 2nd most common malignancy of female genital tract after Carcinoma of cervix. It accounts for 10-15% of total genital malignancies in India.1 It kills more women every year than cancer of all genital sites combine.2 High mortality rate due to ovarian cancer can be attributed to advanced stage at the time of presentation and failure of complete resection of tumour at the time of surgery. Hence, it is crucial to have a fair idea regarding the nature of tumour, benign or malignant at the therapeutic stage so that the primary surgery can be optimally planned and undertaken. The problem of pre-operative diagnosis of the ovarian tumour has not yet been completely solved.3 Specially in resources limited settings in India. This results inevitably in some patients having suboptimal oncoreductive surgeries and other being under staged and at risk of under treatment.4 Due to often asymptomatic nature of the early stage of the disease, many cases of the ovarian tumours present in advanced stage for which 5 year survival rate remains low. Up to 70% of the cases are detected in advanced stages in which mortality rate reaches 70% in 2 years and 90% in 5 years. This has encouraged research into ovarian tumour research methods. Ovarian tumours commonly present as adnexal mass. An adnexal mass refers to any mass occupying a region of the uterine appendages (adnexa). The accurate diagnosis of ovarian tumours is challenging for gynaecologist because of atypical behaviour. Preoperative diagnostic procedure that are able to distinguish whether an ovarian tumour is benign or malignant could be useful in planning and optimizing treatment. Pre-operative assessment of ovarian mass is generally done by bimanual pelvic examination (for its size, shape, consistency, mobility and tenderness), ultrasonography (transabdominal or transvaginal with or without Doppler), computerised tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) and tumour markers (CA-125, CA-15-3, CA-19-9). Among these, CT scan, MRI and PET scan are costly investigations, the availability and affordability cannot be ensured specially in resource limited settings like developing countries. These individual parameters have varying sensitivity and specificity. Any patient with ovarian mass with more than 10 cms in size requires surgical exploration. Ovarian cyst of lesser size in the pre-menopausal age group can be followed up clinically for few months, for expected resolution of functional cysts. Postmenopausal women with complex ovarian mass more than 6 cms requires surgical exploration since there is increased risk of malignancy. Due to high prevalence and case fatality ratio of ovarian tumour even in good hospital set up, early diagnosis and treatment becomes very necessary. The present study will be undertaken to review common clinical, histological presentation and management of patients of ovarian tumours.

 

Aim and objective: To study the management of patients with ovarian tumours at a tertiary health care centre

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Present study was a prospective observational study carried out at a tertiary health care centre. Study was carried out during 2013 to 2015. All the patients admitted in the obstetrics and gynaecology department with ovarian tumour were studied.

Inclusion Criteria: 1.All patients with solid ovarian mass detected clinically and ultrasound examination 2.All patients with cystic ovarian lesions more than 6 cms.

Exclusion criteria: 1.Ovarian cyst less than 6 cms with clear cysts in reproductive age group.

Study was approved by ethical committee of the institute. A valid written consent was taken from patients after explaining study to them. Data was collected with pretested questionnaire. Data included sociodemographic data, clinical history. A through clinical examination was done. All patients underwent routine investigations for surgery. Histopathological reports and ultrasonographic findings were noted. The tumour marker levels of suspicious tumours were tested. The intra- operative findings were noted. Management was done as per type of ovarian tumours. The gross and histopathological study of the specimen was done. The co-relation between preoperative, intra- operative and post operative findings was done. The complications of ovarian tumour were observed. Data was analysed with appropriate statistical tests.

 

RESULTS

There were total 1012 gynaecology admissions in institute during study period, out of which 60 were ovarian tumours. So the incidence was 5.92%. In present study, most of the patients (33.34%) with ovarian tumour were in the age group 51 year old and above, followed by age group of 41-50 years (23.33%). Least belonged to the age group of 31-40 years (18.33%). (table 2) In present study, most common clinical presentation was pain in abdomen (93.33%), followed by abdominal mass (83.33%). Most of the ovarian tumour patients presented with more than one symptoms. Pressure symptoms included retention of urine, increased frequency of micturation, gastrointestional symptoms like constipation. In present study, maximum cases were having unilateral ovarian tumours (63.33%). In present study, among the 60 patients with ovarian tumours, 39 cases (65%) were benign tumours, whereas 21 cases (35%) were malignant. In present study on ultrasonographic examination maximum findings were suggestive of cystic + solid consistency (35%), followed by cystic consistency (33.33%). Least common were liver metastasis (3.33%).In present study, 38.33% of the patients had tumour marker CA-125 positive whereas the remaining 61.67% had CA-125 tumour marker as negative. In our study, among the study group of 60 patients, majority of (40%) were found to have serous cyst adenoma followed by mucinous cyst adenoma (18.33%). (table 3) In present study, most common mode of management of ovarian tumour was cystectomy (44.82%) followed by total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salphingo oopherectomy seen in 29.31% cases. Exploratory laparatomy with biopsy was least carried out (3.44%). (table 4) In present study, 88.33% of patients with ovarian tumour had no complication. 1 patient (1.66%) had recurrence, 2 patients (3.44%) had torsion of tumour.2 patients (3.44%) having ovarian tumour died due advanced ovarian neoplasm and disseminated carcinomatosis (table 5).

Table 1: Incidence of ovarian tumours

Total no patients

1012

Total no of patients with Ovarian tumours

60

Incidence of ovarian tumours

5.92%

Table2: Distribution of ovarian tumour patients according to age group

Age in Years

Cases

Percentage

30

15

25

31-40

11

18.33

41-50

14

23.33

≥ 51

20

33.34

Total

60

100

 

Table 3: Distribution of ovarian tumour patients according to histopathologictal type

Type of Tumour

Cases

Percentage

Serous Cyst Adenoma

24

40

Mucinous Cyst Adenoma

11

18.33

Dermoid Cyst

04

06.66

Serous Cyst Adenocarcinoma

06

10.00

Mucinous Cyst Adenocarcinoma

09

15.00

Papillary Serous Cyst Adenocarcinoma

02

03.33

Papillary Mucinous Cyst Adenocarcinoma

03

05.33

Krukenberg Tumour

01

01.66

Total

60

100

 

Table 4: Distribution of ovarian tumour patients according to management surgery

Operation

Cases

Percentage

Cystectomy

26

44.82

TAHBSO

17

29.31

SL+ TAHBSO

15

22.41

EL+ Biopsy

02

3.44

Total

58

100

 

Table 5: Distribution of ovarian tumour patients according to complications

Complication

Cases

Percentage

Torsion of Tumour

02

03.44

Recurrence

01

01.66

Death

02

03.44

No Complication

53

88.33

Total

60

100

 


DISCUSSION

In our study, out of 1012 patents 60 were ovarian tumours So the incidence was 5.92%. Similar findings were seen in M Yogambal et al. (2013)5 where 5.36% was incidence of ovarian tumours. In a study by Dr. Vaddatti Tejaswini et al. 6 incidence was higher about 7.02% and in a study by Tarek Ramadan Abbas7 incidence was 2.31%. Different incidence was observed in different studies because of different population, different study standards and different methodology used by the investigator. In present study, 33.66% of ovarian tumour were found in age group >51 years. Whereas in the study by R Jha et al.8 ovarian tumour were seen maximum in age group <30 years (32.59%) and study by Vaddatti Tejeswini et al.,6 ovarian tumour were seen maximum in age group of 31-40 years (29.49%). In present study, 63.33% of the patient had unilateral ovarian tumours, as similar to that of study of RK Mishra9 (96.31%) and R Jha et al.8 (87.57%). Both the studies were comparable to the present study. In present study, benign tumours were more commonly seen in 65% cases. In a study by Kanthikar et al. (2014)10 benign tumours were found in 78.57% and malignant tumours were found in 20% patients.Iin a study by Pilli et al. (2002)11 benjgn tumours wwere found in 75.2% patients. similar results were observed in previous studies.12,13 In present study, most common clinical presentation was pain in abdomen seen in 93.33% of cases. It is comparable to studies by Sumaira et al.14 (70.59%), Tarek Ramadan Abbas et al.7 (66.66%), Kanthikar et al.10 (29.33%). Very few cases develop pressure symptoms like retention of urine, frequency of micturation, constipation in all studies. In present study, tumour marker CA-125 was positive in all of the malignant ovarian tumours. It was comparable to study by Habib KA.15 In present study, on histopathalogical examination most common ovarian tumour was serous cyst adenoma seen in 40% of cases. It was comparable to the study by Kanthikar et al..10 In present study, most common mode of management of ovarian tumour was cystectomy (44.82%) followed by total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salphingo oopherectomy seen in 29.31% cases. Exploratory laparatomy with biopsy was least carried out (3.44%). In our study, 88.33% of patients with ovarian tumour had no complication. 1 patient (1.66%) had recurrence, 2 patients (3.44%) had torsion of tumour.2 patients (3.44%) having ovarian tumour died due advanced ovarian neoplasm and disseminated carcinomatosis . Conservative surgery is feasible only in young patients with borderline tumours, or endometrioid, mucinous, or serous Stage IA, grade I ovarian cancer.16-19

 

CONCLUSION

Most common mode of management of ovarian tumour was cystectomy (44.82%) followed by total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salphingo oopherectomy seen in 29.31% cases.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Dutta DC. Text book of gynecology. 5th edition. Kolkatta : new central book agency (P) Ltd; 2009. Chapter 23, genital malignancy; p.321.
  2. Baker TR, Piver SM. Etiology, biology and epidemiology of ovarian cancer seminars in surgical oncology. 1994;10:242-8.
  3. Morgante G, Marka AL, ditto A, Leo VD. Comparison of two malignancy risk indices based on CA-125, ultrasound score and menopausal status in the diagnosis of ovarian masses. Br J Obstet and gynecol. 1999;106:524-527.
  4. Marrow CP. Malignant and borderline epithelial tumor of ovary. Gynaecologic oncology. Malcolm copplesom ed. Churchil livingstone, London 1992, 2nd edition vol 2:889-911.
  5. Yogambal M. Arunalatha P. Chandramouleeswari K, Palaniappan V . IOSR Journal of Dental And Medical Science (IOSR-JDMS). 2014;13(2):74-80.
  6. Veddatti T. Reddy ES. Premalatha P. Vahini G. Study of Morphological Patterns of Ovarian Neoplams. IOSR Journal of Dental And Medical Science (IOSR-JDMS). 2013;10(6):11-16.
  7. Abbas TR. Matar ER. The Incidence and Histopathological Patterns of Ovarian Tumours in Bab Alshaaria University Hospital: Retrospective Study. Nat Sci 2015;13(4):37-41.
  8. Jha R. Karki S. The histological pattern of ovarian tumours and their age distribution. Nepal Medical coll J. 2008;10(2):81-85.
  9. Misra RK, Sharma SP, Gupta U, Gaur R, Mishra SD. Pattern of Overian Neoplasm In Eastern UP. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 1991;30:242-46.
  10. Kanthikar SN. Dravid NV. Deore PN. Nilkumbh DB. Suryawanshi KH. Clinico-Histopathological Analysis of Neoplastic And Non-Neoplastic Lesions of The Ovary: A 3-Years Prospective Study In Dhule, North Maharashtra, India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Aug; 8(8);4-7.
  11. Pilli G, Sunita KP, Dhaded AV. Ovarian Tumours : A study Of 282 Cases. JIMA. 2002;100(7):1-6.
  12. Saxena HMK, Devi G, Prakash P, Pankajam P. Ovarian Neoplasm: A Retrospective Study Of 356 Cases. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 1980;20(6):523-27.
  13. Gupta N, Bisht D, Agarwal AK, Sharma VK. Retrospective and Prospective Study of Ovarian Tumours and Tumour Like Lesions. India J Pathol Microbial. 2007;50(3):525-27.
  14. Sumaria Y . Aiman Y. Mohammad A. Clinicohistological Pattern of Ovarian Tumour in Peshwar Region. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008;20(4).
  15. Habib KA, Jumaa MG, Hussein MJ. Determination of Serum a CA-125 and Evaluate its efficiency as screening tool for Early Detection of Ovarian Tumours. Baghdad Science Journal. 2015;12(11):51-61.
  16. Benedet JL, Bender H, Jones H 3rd, Ngan HY, Pecorelli S. FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000 Aug;70:209-262.
  17. Tropé C, Kaern J. Primary surgery for ovarian cancer. EJSO 2006;32:844-852.
  18. Zanetta G, Rota S, Chiari S, Bonazzi C, Bratina G, Torri V et al.. The accuracy of staging: an important prognostic determinator in stage I ovarian carcinoma. A multivariate analysis. Ann Oncol. 1998;9:1097- 1101.



Policy for Articles with Open Access:
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Gynaecology, (Print ISSN: 2579-0870) (Online ISSN: 2636-4719) agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.