Home About Us Contact Us

Official Journals By StatPerson Publication

Table of Content - Volume 12 Issue 3 - December 2019


Patient profile in superficial corneal foreign body injury at tertiary care hospital

 

Apurva H Suthar1, Mittal G Kuchhadiya2*, Chirag D Odedara3

 

1Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, GMERS Medical College and General Hospital Vadnagar, Khervad Medan, ShiporRoad, Vadnagar, Dist-Mehsana, Gujarat., India.

2Senior Resident, Department of ophthalmology, GMERS Medical College Gandhinagar, Civil hospital campus, Near Pathikasharam, Sector -12, Gandhinagar Gujarat, India.

3Ophthalmologist, Civil Hospital, opposite bus stand, Mehsana, Gujarat, India.

Email:apurva.suthar@ymail.com

 

Abstract               Background: As the most anterior part of the globe, the cornea is the most exposed to foreign bodies. Ocular injury due to superficial corneal foreign body of metallic nature is a common occupational health hazard. Commonly this type of injury is combination of a lack of protective safety eye wear and high-risk activities. This includes grinding, hammering, drilling, and welding. Corneal FBs can cause significant damage if they are not removed quickly. Patient data is important to identify risk factors for prevention of future injury. Material and Methods: Our study is retrospective study in which 100 consecutive patients who came with history of corneal foreign body during month april2019 to june2019 in ophthalmology department at tertiary care hospital were included in study. Data analysis was performed by use of SPSS 19.0 software. P value < 0.05 is considered as statically significant. Patients presented with associated eye injuries with corneal foreign body were excluded from study.Results: Superficial corneal foreign body injury maximum in males 97% compare to females 3%. Among all 86% patients were between 20 to 50 years of age. Material of injury was metal in 83% patients. In all injuries 86% was occupational and 76% patients were from rural areas. There is significant association between patients occupation and locality as p value <0.05. There is also significant association between recurrence of injury and use of safety eye wear as p value <0.05. Conclusion: Superficial corneal foreign body injury is commonest occupation injury. Industrial and construction workers are prone to injuries. By identifying risk factors we can minimize injuries by taking preventive measures like use of safety eye wear and increase awareness.

Key Words: Superficial corneal foreign body, Occupation, Safety Eye Wear.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

A corneal foreign body is an object that is superficially adherent or embedded in the cornea. As the most anterior part of the globe, the cornea is the most exposed to foreign bodies. Corneal foreign body injuries are divided into two categories; superficial, not involving Bowman’s membrane and deep, penetrating Bowman’s membrane, but not rupturing Descemet’s membrane. Corneal foreign bodies typically enter the epithelium but are prevented from penetrating deep into the tissue by the whirling and stiff Bowman’s membrane.1 Superficial corneal foreign bodies are much more common than deeply embedded corneal foreign bodies. Although superficial foreign bodies often spontaneously exit the cornea in the tear film, occasionally leaving a residual abrasion, other foreign bodies remain on or within the cornea The longer the time interval between the injury and treatment, the greater the likelihood of complications. Ocular injury due to superficial corneal foreign body of metallic nature is a common occupational health hazard.2, 3, 4 Corneal FBs usually causes marked irritation, redness and watering often with pain and a repeated blink reflex. Patients are usually very good at localizing the corneal foreign body.5 Corneal foreign bodies can cause significant damage if they are not removed quickly. Infection generally does not develop from a metallic foreign body. However, corneal scarring and rust deposits can develop. Also, if a corneal foreign body is organic material, infection can develop. Corneal foreign body injury is commonest among industrial and constructional workers. Most commonly it is a combination of a lack of protective eye-wear and high-risk activities. This includes grinding, hammering, drilling, and welding. Ocular injuries at work are preventable and are attributable to the misuse or nonuse of safety eyewear. In workers education level is very law and health and safety concerns come second to economic considerations and pressure to complete the work at hand.6 For reduction of accidents, many companies in the construction industry use the Construction Skills Certificate Scheme (CSCS) to improve education and certify awareness of these issues.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 Our study is retrospective study in which 100 consecutive patients who came with history of superficial corneal foreign body during month april2019 to june2019 in ophthalmology department at tertiary care hospital are included in study. Permission from Ethics committee was taken from hospital. Study is retrospective data analysis study. All statistics were performed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS Version X; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) 19.0 software. T test was performed for the comparison of mean value, and x2-test for the significant difference between count data. Comparisons between groups were conducted using least significant difference (LSD) method. p<0.05 suggested the difference was statistically significant. Patient data collected was about patient name, age, sex, residence, education, occupation, present and past history, use of safety eye wear. Patients presented with associated eye injuries with corneal foreign body are excluded from study. Generally corneal foreign body injuries present as an emergency following acute injury, making them a common urgent clinical entity of ophthalmic practice. Patients with corneal foreign body present with acute pain, photophobia, watering, difficulty in eye opening foreign body sensation, blurry vision depending upon the location of the particle and a history of having something in them Eye.2,7,8,9,10 In ocular trauma patients were administered adequate pain control to assist in obtaining an accurate and thorough exam. Following pain control eyes examined for visual acuity and papillary reflex. All patients suspected of having a corneal foreign went undergone a slit lamp examination. In all Patients of corneal foreign body removed with bended 26 no needle attach with 2 cc syringe after application of local anesthetic eye drop for local anesthesia of cornea. After removal of foreign body Moxifloxacin eye drop qid for 10 days with two to three day follow ups were given. Some patient with large and multiple foreign bodies were patched after application of Moxifloaxcin and lubricating eye ointment application and examined on next day at ophthalmology department for further treatment.


 

RESULTS

After complete analysis of 100 patient data we got following results.

Table 1: Age and sex distribution of patients

Age in years

Sex

Total

Male

Female

<20

3

2

5

20 to 50

85

1

86

>50

9

0

9

Total

97

3

100

Table 1 showing 86% people were between 20 to 50 years of age. Males 97% affected most commonly.

 

                                                                           Table 1: Education of patients

Education status

Sex

Total

Male

Female

<5 Class

62

3

65

5 to 10 Class

27

0

27

>10 Class

8

0

8

Total

97

3

100

Table 2 showing 65% patients were education status less than 5 Class.

 

 

 

Table 3: Mode of injury in patients

Occupation

Work

No of patient

Construction and industrial work

Grinding

37

Welding

18

Drilling

13

Hammering

11

Agricultural work

Farming

7

Other

Driving

13

 

Playing

1

Total

 

100

According to table 3 most common mode of injury was while grinding which is 37%.

 

Table 4: Type/origin of foreign body

Type/origin of foreign body

No of patient

Metal

83

Vegetative

8

Plastic

2

Glass

2

Insect

5

Total

100

Table 4 showing in 83% patient superficial foreign body was metal in origin.

 

Table 5: Locality and occupation

 

Locality of patients

Total

Urban

Rural

 

Occupational

14

72

86

Non occupational

10

4

14

 

24

76

100

Table 5 Showing significant association between patient locality and occupation as p value <0.05.Table 5 shows76% patients were from rural area and 86% injury was occupational

 

Table 6: Use of safety eye wear and recurrence

Recurrence

Use of safety eye wear

Total

Yes

No

Present

1

21

22

Absent

18

53

78

Total

19

81

100

Table 6 showing significant association between use of safety wear and recurrence as p value is 0.03 which is <0.05.

 

Table 7: Attempt for self removal

Self attempt to

remove foreign body

Sex

Total

Male

Female

Present

61

1

62

Absent

36

2

38

Total

97

3

100

Table 7 showing 62% of patients were try to remove foreign body before coming to hospital.

DISCUSSION

At Tertiary Care Hospital in ophthalmology department we routinely treat many cases of superficial foreign body on cornea. We got important multiple findings after examine data of 100 patients at ophthalmology department and going to discuss about it. Purpose of this study is to identify risk factors for this type of injuries and take some appropriate action to reduce incidence of injuries. Superficial Corneal foreign body is common and serious but preventable occupational injury.11 Symptoms of corneal foreign body include foreign body sensation, tearing and red eye. Vision generally less affected.According to table no 1 Incidence of Superficial corneal foreign body was maximum in males 97% than females 3% compared to 99.3% in males and 0.7% in females in another study.12 Table no 1 also shows that 86% patients were between 20 to 50 years of age, Comparing to other study were mean age was 39 ± 13 years and 78% of the patients was aged between 21 and 50 years.12 Another Comparing study reveals that mean age was 32.46 ± 1.03years.3According to table no 2 Educational level in 65% patient was less than class 5, Less education is significant risk factor for eye injury particularly in occupational injuries. Table no 3 showing that 79% patients had history of foreign body fall in eye while working at construction and industrial site and most common mode of injury is while grinding which is 37% compare to 22.5% in another study.13 As shown in table 4 in our study 83% superficial corneal foreign bodies were metal Comparing to another study were it was 59%.3 Table no 4 shows that vegetative material was present in 8% of corneal foreign body patients. Vegetative material is most dangerous among all corneal foreign body injuries as it causes fungal corneal damage if not treated properly in time with appropriate medications. Vegetative matter foreign body is common among agricultural workers. In developing where there is less mechanization of farming corneal ulceration is commonly found against developed countries where farming is mostly mechanized.14, 15 Insects and plastic foreign body common in farmers followed by drivers. Glass particle found in work related to glass factory. Occupational corneal foreign body injuries seen commonly in those working in metal industry and construction workers.16Occupational ocular injuries constitute a major cause of eye trauma and causes significant morbidity.17According to table no 5 among all superficial corneal foreign bodies 86% was occupational and 76% patient were from rural areas. There is significant association between occupation and locality as p value is less than 0.05.A study from India reported that a majority of individuals incurring eye injuries residing in rural areas did not use any eye protection.18 Occupational injuries is commonest cause of corneal superficial foreign body. Law education in rural population with very less awareness on using safety eye wear while working make them prime candidate for occupational injury.Table no 6 showing that only 19% patients using safety eye wear and among all patients 22 % patient has history of foreign body fall in eye in past. According table no 6 there is significance association between recurrence and use of safety eye wear as p value is less than 0.05. Comparing to our study data 45.9% of the patient safety eye wear in another study which is higher.12 Some of the reasons for not using the protective eye devices include discomfort and poor visibility and inadequate appreciation of the necessity to wear it.12. Decrease work capacity due to getting dirtiness of safety eye wear in hot and humid areas of daily working is also prohibiting factors in workers. According to another study average rate of safety eye wear usage was 35%.16 Some studies have noted that safety training at the workplace is effective in changing workers attitude toward safety measures and motivates them to actively adopt the same in daily work.19,20 Work-related eye injuries can be prevented by wearing safety eyewear. While the use of safety eyewear is universally known and advocated by industry, compliance with safety guidelines among workers is poor.16, 21, 22, 23, 24 There is requirement of further studies within the work area are to investigate the adequacy of the safety eye wear, the reasons for non-use and whether workers and employers are aware of the results of Noncompliance. Table no 7 shows that 62% of patients who try to remove foreign body before coming to hospital at comparing to other study which was 52%.3 Patients were not giving significant importance towards corneal foreign body in eye while working as it did not cause marked visual impairments while working and continue their working just by giving some wash with water and even try to remove foreign body by himself or by help of co workers at local site. Less awareness about seriousness of lesion in eye in patients worsen conditions of eye and produce extra damage to cornea like corneal ulceration and opacity. After discussing above data we come to know about many preventable risk factors which causesuperficial corneal foreign body injury and necessary steps should be taken for it.

 

CONCLUSION

Superficial corneal foreign body injury causes less visual impairment and less affects quality of patient daily life. Most of superficial corneal foreign body is preventive type.Industrial workers are most commonly affected by superficial corneal foreign body injury. Vegetative matter injury less common but dangerous if not treated properly in agricultural workers. Occupation and safety eye wear use are most important parameter. Awareness about use of safety eye wear is very less in community people. Those who have safety eye wear are not using according to safety guide line in industries and constructional sites. Educating patients about not to rubbed eye and not attempt to remove the foreign body by own is also important. There is urgent requirement of increase awareness for this of preventive ocular injury require on large scale by government, local higher authorities, social workers, social media messages and news channels.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Snell RS, Lemp MA. The eyeball. In: Snell RS, Lemp MA. Clinical anatomy of the eye, 2nd Ed. Blackwell Science Inc., 1998: 132-213.
  2. Gumus K, Karakucuk S, Mirza E (2007) Corneal injury from a metallic foreign body: an occupational hazard. Eye Contact Lens 33: 259-260.
  3. Ozkurt ZG, Yuksel H, Saka G, Guclu H, Evsen S, et al. (2014) Metallic corneal foreign bodies: an occupational health hazard. Arq Bras Oftalmol 77: 81-83.
  4. Karlson TA, Klein BE (1986) The incidence of acute hospital-treated eye injuries. Arch Ophthalmol 104: 1473-6.
  5. Kay-Wilson LG; Localisation of corneal foreign bodies. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992 Dec76(12):741-2.
  6. Stallones L, Acosta MS, Sample P, Bigelow P, Rosales M. Perspectives on safety and health among migrant and seasonal farmworkers in the United States and México: A qualitative field study. J Rural Health 2009;25:219-25.
  7. Lubeck D, Greene JS. Corneal injuries. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1988;6(1):73-94.
  8. Yiğit O, Yürüktümen A, Arslan S. Foreign body traumas of the eye managed in an emergency department of a single-institution. Ulus TravmaAcilCerrahiDerg. 2012;18(1):75-9.
  9. Agrawal R, Laude A, Taneja M. Fish-hook injury of the eye. Int Ophthalmol. 2012;32(3):269-71.
  10. Ramakrishnan T, Constantinou M, Jhanji V, Vajpayee RB. Corneal metallic foreign body injuries due to suboptimal ocular protection. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2012;67(1):48-50.
  11. Woo JH, Sundar G (2006) Eye injuries in Singapore--don't risk it. Do more. A prospective study. Ann Acad Med Singapore 35: 706-718.
  12. Ajayi IA, Adeoye AO, Bekibele CO, Onakpoya OH, Omotoye OJ (2011) Awareness and utilization of protective eye device among welders in a southwestern Nigeria community. Ann Afr Med 10: 294-299.
  13. Wong TY, Lincoln A, Tielsch JM, Baker SP (1998) The epidemiology of ocular injury in a major US automobile corporation. Eye (Lond) 1998;12: 870-874.
  14. Thylefors B. Epidemiological patterns of oculartrauma.. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol1992;20:95-8.
  15. Khatry SK, Lewis AE, Schein OD, Thapa MD, Pradhan EK,KatzJ.The epidemiology of ocular trauma in rural Nepal. Br J Ophthalmol2004;88:456-60.
  16. Welch LS, Hunting KL, Mawudeku A (2001) Injury surveillance in construction: eye injuries. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 16: 755-762.
  17. Lipscomb HJ (2005) The importance of observational methods for evaluation of interventions to prevent occupational injuries. Occup Environ Med 62: 819-820.
  18. Krishnaiah S, Nirmalan PK, Shamanna BR, Srinivas M, Rao GN, Thomas R. Ocular trauma in a rural population of Southern India: The Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology2006;113:1159-64.
  19. Monaghan PF, Forst LS, Tovar-Aguilar JA, Bryant CA, Israel GD, Galindo-Gonzalez S, et al. Preventing eye injuries among citrus harvesters: The community health worker model. Am JPublicHealth2011;101:2269-74.
  20. Tovar-Aguilar JA, Monaghan PF, Bryant CA, Esposito A, Wade M, Ruiz O, et al. Improving eye safety in citrus harvest crews through the acceptance of personal protective equipment, community-based participatory research, social marketing, and community health workers. J Agromedicine2014;19:107-16.
  21. de la Hunty D, Sprivulis P. Safety goggles should be worn by Australian workers.Aust N ZJOphthalmol1994;22:49-52.
  22. Yu TS, Liu H, Hui K. A case-control study of eye injuries in the workplace in Hong Kong. Ophthalmology 2004;111:70-4.
  23. Fong LP, Taouk Y. The role of eye protection in work-related eye injuries. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol1995;23:101-6.
  24. Henderson D. Ocular trauma: One in the eye for safety glasses. Arch Emerg Med 1991;8:201-4.