Home About Us Contact Us

 

Table of Content - Volume 13 Issue 2 - Feburary 2020


A study on ocular manifestations of neurofibromatosis type-1 in rural population of Chittoor district, Andhra Pradesh

 

Divya D1, N Sathish Kumar2*, Hanumanthappa3, Vishnu Priya4, Jayasimha5

 

1Assistant Professor, 2Associate Professor, 3Professor & HOD, 4Senior Resident, 5Junior resident, Department of Ophthalmology, Apollo Institute of Medical Science and Research, Murakambattu, Chittoor district, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA .

Email: eyesurgeon2004@gmail.com

 

Abstract               Neurofibromatosis, an oculo-neurocutaneous syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder involving multiple systems. It is of 2 types, Neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF-1) and Neurofibromatosis type-2 (NF-2) The syndrome is caused by genetic mutations on chromosome 17 in NF-1 and on chromosome 22 in NF-2. The disorder is characterized by considerable heterogeneity of clinical expression. Materials and Methods: The present study is an observational study conducted at Apollo institute of medical sciences and research, hospital, Chittoor district during the period of December 2018 to December 2019. The study included 36 patients with NF, presenting to Ophthalmology OPD with any complaints. Diagnosis of Neurofibromatosis was done based on the criteria proposed by the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development. Results: The most common ophthalmic manifestation in these patients was Lisch nodules (83.3%) and Neurofibromas of the upper and lower eyelid (83.3%). Plexiform neurofibroma was seen in 8 patients (22.2%) among which, 5 (62.5%) patients have upper lid involvement and 3 (37.5%) patients have both upper and lower lid involvement. Orbital neurofibroma was seen in 8 (22.2%) patients. Vision loss due to the disease was seen in 12 ( 33.3%) patients among which, 3 (25%) patients had vision loss due to Stimulus deprivation amblyopia due to plexiform neurofibroma, 3 ( 25%) had vision loss due to compressive optic neuropathy due to orbital neurofibroma, 5 ( 41.7%) had both plexiform and orbital neurofibromas,1 (8.3%) patient had coloboma choroid involving macular area. Conclusion: Lisch nodules in iris and neurofibromas of eyelids are the most common manifestation in Neurofibromatosis patients in our study. Visual impairment as a result of this disease was seen in 33% of patients in our study. So intervention at the earliest can avoid visual loss in Neurofibromatosis patients.

Key Words: Oculoneurocutaneous syndrome, Plexiform Neurofibroma, Orbital neurofibroma, Lisch nodules.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

Neurofibromatosis, an oculo-neurocutaneous syndrome is characterized by multisystem involvement1. Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) affects about 1 in 4000 individuals, and Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) affects about 1 in 50,0002. Both forms are transmitted by an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance. Although the penetrance of both NF1 and NF2 is greater than 95%, the expressivity of the disease is highly variable1,3,5. Neurofibromatosis type 1, peripheral neurofibromatosis or von Recklinghausen’s syndrome, is characterized by cutaneous neurofibromas, café-au-lait spots, Axillary and inguinal freckles, Lisch nodules of iris, Orbital neurofibromas, optic nerve glioma or solid tumors of central nervous system4. Neurofibromatosis type 2, central or bilateral acoustic neurofibromatosis, is characterized by central neural tumors. Its hallmark is bilateral acoustic neuroma2. In the present study, the most common ophthalmic findings in Neurofibromatosis and it’s serious effects on the visual function of the patient were studied.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study is an observational study conducted at Apollo institute of medical sciences and research, hospital, Chittoor district during the period of December 2018 to December 2019. The study included 36 patients with NF, presenting to Ophthalmology OPD with any complaints. Diagnosis of Neurofibromatosis was done based on the criteria proposed by the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development13. A thorough clinical assessment of these patients was done by taking a brief history of presenting complaints, family history, and then thorough examination is done, which included Assessment of visual acuity through Snellen’s chart, slit lamp examination, Fundus evaluation by direct and indirect ophthalmoscopy. Ultrasonography / Computed tomography / Magnetic resonance imaging of orbits were done wherever necessary.

Inclusion criteria:

  1. All the patients who satisfy the criteria of Neurofibromatosis according to National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference13
  2. Patients who are willing to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Neurofibromatosis type-2 patients
  2. Patients with atypical signs of Neurofibromatosis
  3. Patients with any other genetic disorder apart from Neurofibromatosis

 

RESULTS

Out of 36 patients of neurofibromatosis, 21 (58.3%) were female and 15 (41.7%) were male. Most of the patients presenting to OPD were aged between 46-60 years (33.3%). The most common ophthalmic manifestation in these patients was Lisch nodules (83.3%) and Neurofibromas of the upper and lower eyelid (83.3%). Plexiform neurofibroma was seen in 8 patients (22.2%) among which, 5 (62.5%) patients have upper lid involvement and 3 (37.5%) patients have both upper and lower lid involvement. Orbital neurofibroma was seen in 8 (22.2%) patients. Among 36 cases normal visual acuity was observed in 24 cases (66.7%), visual impairment was seen in 12 cases (33.3%). Out of 12 ( 33.3%) patients with visual impairment, 3 (25%) patients had stimulus deprivation amblyopia due to plexiform neurofibroma, 3 ( 25%) had compressive optic neuropathy due to orbital neurofibroma, 5 ( 41.7%) had both plexiform and orbital neurofibromas, 1 (8.3%) patient had coloboma choroid involving macular area. Regarding the genetic pattern of inheritance, among 36 patients, single generation was affected in 18 (50%) patients, 2-generations were affected in 9 (25%) patients, 3-generations were affected in 3 (8.3%) patients, 4-generations were affected in 3 (8.3%) patients, 5-generations were affected in 3 (8.3%).

TABLE 1: GENDER DISTRIBUTION

Gender

Number of patients

Percentage %

Female

21

58.3%

Male

15

41.7%

 

TABLE 2: AGE OF PRESENTATION

Age of presentation

Number of patients

Percentage %

10-15 years

6

16.7%

16-30 years

3

8.3%

31-45 years

6

16.7%

46-60 years

12

33.3%

61-75 years

9

25%

 

TABLE3: OPHTHALMIC MANIFESTATIONS

Ophthalmic findings

 

Number of patients

Percentage %

Lisch nodules

 

30

83.3%

Neurofibromas on eyelids

and eyebrows

 

30

83.3%

Plexiform neurofibroma of

Eyelids

8

Upper and lower lid(3)

Only Upper lid(5)

22.2%

Upper and lower lid(37.5%)

Only Upper lid (62.5%)

Orbital neurofibroma

8

22.2%

Coloboma of Choroid with macular involvement

1

2.8%

TABLE 4: VISUAL ACUITY OF PATIENTS

Visual acuity

Number of patients

Percentage

Normal

24

66.7%

Visual impairment (due to the disease proper)

12

33.3%

 

TABLE 5: CAUSE FOR AMBLYOPIA

Cause for Amblyopia

Number of

Patients

Percentage %

Only Plexiform neurofibroma

(Stimulus deprivation)

3

25%

Only Orbital neurofibroma

(Compressive Optic neuropathy)

3

25%

 

Both Plexiform neurofibroma and Orbital neurofibroma

5

41.7%

Coloboma choroid

1

8.3%

TABLE 6: GENETIC PATTERN OF DISEASE TRANSMISSION

Generations affected

Single generation affected (denovo

Mutation)

2 generations affected

3 generations affected

4 generations affected

5 generations affected

Number of Patients

18

9

3

3

3

Percentage %

50%

25%

8.3%

8.3%

8.3%

1

Figure 1: Plexiform Neurofibroma of Upper eyelid; Figure 2: Plexiform Neurofibroma of Upper eyelid and Orbital neurofibroma; Figure 3: Cutaneous neurofibromas

2

                 Figure 4: Orbital Neurofibroma of Left eye                                                   Figure 5: Coloboma choroid of Left eye in a patient with

Neurofibromatosis

3

                               Figure 6: Lisch nodules over the Iris                                 Figure 7: Plexiform neurofibroma of    Figure 8: Café-au-lait spots

                                                                                                                                             upper and lower eyelid


DISCUSSION

Neurofibromatosis is a group of autosomal-dominant disorders, characterized by genetically distinct neurocristopathies (multiple hamartomas of neural crest origin) in which individuals develop both benign and malignant tumors at an increased frequency6,7,8. The NF 1 gene is on the long arm of chromosome 17. It has been cloned and its protein product, neurofibromin, was identified in 19909,10,11. The hallmark of the NF 1 gene is its high mutation rate with up to 50% of cases being caused by de novo mutations12. The diagnosis of NF 1 is based primarily on clinical criteria. The diagnostic criteria for NF1 as originally established by the NIH Consensus Development Conference specified that two or more of the following be present: 1 six or more cafe-au-lait macules more than 5mm in greatest diameter in prepubertal individuals and more than 15mm in greatest diameter after puberty, 2 two or more neurofibromas of any type or one plexiform neurofibroma, 3 freckling in the axillary or inguinal regions, 4 optic nerve glioma, 5 two or more Lisch nodules (iris hamartomas), 6 an osseous lesion, such as sphenoid wing dysplasia or thinning of the cortex of the long bones(with or without pseudarthrosis), and 7 a first-degree relative with NF 1 by the above criteria13 Approximately 25% of patients with Neurofibromatosis develop complications, which include plexiform neurofibroma, malignancies like orbital neurofibroma, optic nerve glioma, neurofibrosarcoma7. Orbital Neurofibroma is the most common cause for the development of amblyopia in neurofibromatosis patients. It is probably the most frequent peripheral nerve tumor of the orbit, accounting for 0.8 to 3.0% of all histopathologically proven orbital lesions 14–16. It is classified into three subsets: Plexiform, Diffuse, and Localized. The localized type is only seldom associated with neurofibromatosis17,5. It behaves like many other solitary well-circumscribed soft tissue tumors in the orbit and presents at a later age than the plexiform type. The typical patient is a young or middle-aged adult18,19. The diagnosis of neurofibromatosis is clinical. Linkage analysis using polymorphic DNA markers can be performed, allowing prenatal diagnosis or presymptomatic diagnosis. Additionally, a commercial assay for NF1 gene mutations is available that is based upon a protein truncation test20, with limited sensitivity (60%-70%), however, and is not yet recommended as the single diagnostic tool for NF1; rather, it can be used in conjunction with the clinical findings. Early diagnosis and early treatment of plexiform neurofibroma, orbital neurofibromas, and optic nerve glioma decrease the chances of development of amblyopia and compressive optic neuropathy respectively, which affects 5 % of patients suffering from neurofibromatosis 21. The management of localized orbital neurofibroma consists of total excision. Postoperatively, a sensory skin deficit was present in 72% of the patients with an isolated orbital neurofibroma. 46% of tumors can usually be dissected completely from the surrounding orbital contents. Plexiform neurofibroma can be managed by excision of the neurofibroma followed by eyelid reconstruction22.

 

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, Lisch nodules in iris and neurofibromas of eyelids are the most common manifestation in Neurofibromatosis patients in our study. Visual impairment as a result of the disease can occur in 33% of patients either due to stimulus deprivation amblyopia or due to compressive optic neuropathy, which can be intervened by early diagnosis. Denovo mutations are more common accounting for 50% of cases in this study.

 

REFERENCES

    • Sippel KC. Ocular findings in neurofibromatosis type 1. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2001; 41:25–40.
    • The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference. Neurofibromatosis. Arch Neurol 1988; 45:575–578.
    • Rettele GA, Brodsky MC, Merin LM, et al. Blindness, deafness, quadriparesis and a retinal malformation: The ravages of neurofibromatosis 2. Surv Ophthalmol 1996; 41:135–141.
    • Riccardi V M.Neurofibromatosis:Past, present and future.N Engl J Med. 1991;324:283-5.
    • Zia Chaudhuri,MVanathi: Post graduate Ophthalmology.1st edition. 2012. vol.2:1891-2.
    • Huson SM, Compston DAS, Clark P, et al: A genetic study of von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis in south east Wales. Prevalence, fitness, mutation rate, and effect of parental transmission on severity. JMed Genet 26:704-711, 1989
    • Riccardi VM: Neurofibromatosis: Past, present, and future. N Engl J Med 324:1283-1285, 1991
    • Riccardi VM, Eichner JE: Neurofibromatosis: Phenotype, natural history, and pathogenesis, ed 2. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992
    • Cawthon RM, Weiss M, Xu G, et al: A major segment of the neurofibromatosis Type I gene: cDNA sequence, genomic structure, and point mutations. Cell 62193-201, 1990
    •  Van der Hoeven J: Les phacomatoses de Burnsville, de Recklinghausen et de von Hippel-Lindau. Journal of Belgian Neurology and Psychiatry 33:752-762, 1933
    • Weiss DI: Dial origin of glaucoma in encephalotrigeminal haemangiomatosis: A pathogenetic concept based upon histopathologic and hemodynamic considerations.Trans Am Ophthalmol SOC 93:477- 493,1973
    • Huson SM, Hughes RAC: The Neurofibromatoses: A Pathogenetic and Clinical Overview. London, Chapman and Hall, 1994.
    •  Neurofibromatosis conference statement. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference.Arch Neurol.1988;45(5):575-78.
    •  Shields JA, Bakewell B, Augsburger JJ, Flanagan JC. Classification and incidence of space-occupying lesions of the orbit. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102:1606–1611.
    • Henderson JW, Campbell RJ, Farrow GM, Garrity JA. Orbital Tumors. New York: Raven Press; 1994:43–52.
    • Sen DK. An aetiological pattern of orbital tumors in India and their clinical presentations. A 20-year retrospective study. Orbit.1990;9:299–302
    •  Shields JA. Diagnosis and Management of Orbital Tumors.Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1989:149–169
    •  Krohel GB, Rosenberg PN, Wright JE, Smith RS. Localized orbital neurofibromas. Am J Ophthalmol 1985; 100:458–464.
    •  Rocca RCD, Roen J, Labay GR, Bedrossian E. Isolated neurofibroma of the orbit. Ophthalmic Surg 1985; 16:634–638.
    • Heim RA, Silverman LM, Farger RA, et al: Screening for truncated NFL proteins. Nat Genet 8:218-219,1994
    • Samuelsson B. Neurofibromatosis. A clinical and genetic study of 96 cases in Gothenberg, Sweden. Acta Derm Veneered (stock) 1981;95 (suppl):67-71.
    • Rose GE, Wright JE. Isolated peripheral nerve sheath tumors of the orbit. Eye 1991;5:668–673.

    Policy for Articles with Open Access
    Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Ophthalmology (Print ISSN:2550-7575) (Online ISSN: 2636-4700) agree to the following terms:
    Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.