Home About Us Contact Us

 

Table of Content - Volume 13 Issue 3 - March 2020

A study of paediatric ocular injuries

 

Harish Shetty

 

Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Karwar Institute of Medical Sciences, Karwar, INDIA.

 

Abstract              Background: The first and the second decade of life ocular trauma forms about 20–50% of all eye injuries approximately 8–14% of total injuries in children below 10 years of age. Forty to sixty thousand of eye injuries lead to visual loss. Despite its public health importance, there is relatively less population-based data on the magnitude and risk factors for ocular trauma, especially from developing countries. Trauma to the eye and ensuing visual disability is an important cause of preventable monocular blindness in the paediatric age group in India. The ensuing visual disability has significant emotional, psychological, and Socioeconomically impact on the individual person, family, and to the society as a whole.1 Policy decisions helpful in preventing this kind of trauma and improving the required trauma management services warrant an accurate estimate of the pattern of the ocular trauma in Indian population.

Key Words: Paediatric, Ocular, Injuries, Clinical, Demographic.

 

INTRODUCTION

Ocular trauma can be considered as a life long suffering and also devastating injury, which can be responsible causing disability for a lifetime in children. This is one of the most important and common factor for loss of vision.1 Globally 5 lakh injuries occur every year.2 This is the reported numbers and there are also so many unreported cases. This may be easily one of the most important fields which has to be controlled. The total number of cases in India at present was reported as 2.4%.3 Throughout the world there are approximately 1.6 million people blind from eye injuries, 2.3 million bilaterally visually impaired, and 19 million with unilateral visual loss.4 It is also very preventable, perhaps a little care would make sure of the prevention of the injuries.5 The first and the second decade of life ocular trauma forms about 20–50% of all eye injuries6 approximately 8–14% of total injuries in children below 10 years of age.7 Forty to sixty thousands of eye injuries lead to visual loss.8 Despite its public health importance, there is relatively less population-based data on the magnitude and risk factors for ocular trauma, especially from developing countries.9 Trauma to the eye and ensuing visual disability is an important cause of preventable monocular blindness in the paediatric age group in India. The ensuing visual disability has significant emotional, psychological, and Socioeconomically impact on the individual person, family, and to the society as a whole.10 Policy decisions helpful in preventing this kind of trauma and improving the required trauma management services warrant an accurate estimate of the pattern of the ocular trauma in Indian population.11 Most of our understanding of this issue is based on the studies from developed countries12,13,14

 

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the paediatric ocular injuries.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was done in the Department of Ophthalmology, Karwar Institute of Medical Sciences.

This study was done from August 2019 to Jan 20.

This study was done by observing 30 patients that we treated in the Department.

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients below 16 years

Exclusion Criteria:

Past ocular pathology.

Patients on immunosuppressant and anticancer treatment.


RESULTS

    fig1

          Graph 1: Age Distribution                        
fig2
Graph 2:
Sex Distribution                                                                

fig3
Graph 3: Injuries

 

Table 1: Materials causing the Injury

Material

Frequency

Stick

11

Stone

13

Key

02

Dog bite

01

Hook

02

Ball

02

 

Table 2: Zone of Injuries According to BETT (Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology)

fig4

Graph 4

 DISCUSSION

Eye injuries per Birmingham classification (Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology) BETT are divided into closed and open eye injuries.15,16.. Zones of injuries for closed globe injury (based on location of injury)- Zone 1: external (limited to bulbar conjunctiva, sclera and cornea) Zone 2: anterior segment (including posterior lens capsule including pars plicata) Zone 3: posterior segment (all internal structures posterior to the posterior lens capsule). When our study was compared with other studies. Age- in our study majority were in between 6-10 yrs. (42%), in Rohit Saxena et al..31 Study 5 years and older (87%) and in Saha et al.32 6-10 yrs. (47%). Sex- majority were boys in our study 68% which is comparable to Rohit Saxena et al.31 63% and Saha et al.32 63% studies. Type of injury-in our study 34% and 33%, in Rohit Saxena et al.31 53% and 42% and in Saha et al.32 53% and 32% open and closed globe injury respectively. Object causing injury-stick is most common object causing injury in our study. bow and arrowand sharp objects in Rohit Saxena et al.31 and Saha et al.32 studies respectively. Place of injury- playground/outdoor is most common place in ours and above two studies. The role of ocular injuries secondary to head trauma in the causation of blindness has become a subject of immense importance. TBI leads to neurocognitive deficits such as impaired attention, inability to perform visuospatial associations and psychological health issues. TBI is considered a silent epidemic as society is unaware of magnitude of the problem. The manifestations of head injury and its numerous other systemic complications are so compelling that damage to the visual system is most likely to be ignored. Many a times, when the eye is examined as part of neurological assessment of a patient with head injury, the purpose is mainly to gauge the severity of the head injury itself. Many hypotheses have been advanced to explain the cause of head injuries, but most of these hypotheses have remained untested and unproven.

When we compare with other study the following can be compared.


 

Nailini S

Rohit Sexena et al.

Saha et al.

 

6-10yrs. (42%)

5& older (87%)

6-10yrs. (47%)

Boys

68%

63%

63%

Type pf injury (Open & closed respectively)

34% &33%

53% & 42%

53% & 32%

Object causing injury

Stick

Bow and arrow

Sharp Object

Place of injury

Platground/outdoor

Outdoor

Playgroud

Presenting interval

<6 hrs.

>24 hrs

>24 hrs.

 


CONCLUSION

This is the most common and preventable type of injury. So utmost important should be given to this field by educating people and also prompt treatment should be initiated as soon as the patient lands in the OPD.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Parver LM. Eye trauma. The neglected disorder. Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104(10):1452-1453.
  2.  Négrel AD, Thylefors B. The global impact of eye injuries. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1998;5(3):143-169.
  3. Katz J, Tielsch JM. Lifetime prevalence of ocular injuries from the Baltimore eye survey. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:1564-1568.
  4. Schein OD, Hibberd PL, Shingleton BJ, et al.. The spectrum and burden of ocular injury. Ophthalmology 1988;95(3):300-305.
  5. McCarty CA, Fu CL, Taylor HR. Epidemiology of ocular trauma in Australia. Ophthalmology 1999;106(9):1847-1852.
  6. Kuhn F. Ocular trauma in children and in elderly patients. In: Kuhn F, ed. Ocular Traumatology. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer 2008: p. 419.
  7. Brophy M, Sinclair SA, Hostetler SG, et al.. Paediatric eye injury-related hospitalizations in the United States. Paediatrics 2006;117(6):e1263-e1271.
  8. Wong TY, Klein BE, Klein R. The prevalence and 5- year incidence of ocular trauma. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2000;107(12):2196-2202.
  9. Glynn RJ, Seddon JM, Berlin BM. The incidence of eye injuries in New England adults. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106(6):785-789.
  10. Le Q, Chen Y, Wang X, et al.. Analysis of medical expenditure and socio‑economic status in patients with ocular chemical burns in East China: a retrospective study. BMC Public Health 2012;12:409.
  11. Makarov PV, Kataev MG, Gundorova RA, et al.. Surgical treatment policy for concomitant burn injury to the eye in patients admitted to burn units. Vestnik Oftalmologii 2009;125(5):50-52.
  12. Tadisina KK, Abcarian A, Omi E. Facial firework injury: a case series. West J Emerg Med 2014;15(4):387- 393.
  13. Serna‑Ojeda JC, Cordova‑Cervantes J, Lopez‑Salas M, et al.. Management of traumatic cataract in adults at a reference center in Mexico City. Int Ophthalmol 2015;35(4):451-458.
  14. Natarajan S. Ocular trauma, an evolving sub specialty. Indian J Ophthalmol 2013;61(10):539‑540.
  15. Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, et al.. The Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology system (BETT). J Fr Ophtalmol 2004;27(2):206-210.
  16. Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD. Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology (BETT): terminology and classification of mechanical eye injuries. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2002;15(2):139-143.

Policy for Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Ophthalmology (Print ISSN:2550-7575) (Online ISSN: 2636-4700) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.