Home About Us Contact Us

 

Table of Content - Volume 20 Issue 1 - October 2021


 

Effect of trabeculectomy on corneal astigmatism

 

Jyothi V1, Arunkumar B Malladad2*

 

1Assistant Professor, 2Senior Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, SS Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Davanagere, Karnataka, INDIA.

Email:nandanajyothi2009@gmail.com

 

Abstract              Background: Most human eyes show at least a small degree of corneal astigmatism and it can arise from both surfaces of the cornea. Trabeculectomy has been shown to control intraocular pressure especially in cases of open angle glaucoma. These procedures altered visual function by changes in corneal curvature. Objectives: We evaluate to detect the incidence of corneal astigmatism and to analyze factors responsible for corneal astigmatism following trabeculectomy. Methods: This is a Prospective Study conducted in Department of Ophthalmology at multiple centre and concluded at SS Institute of Medical Sciences and Research centre, Davanagere, Karnataka. A total 50 eyes of 40 patients were included in these study and their preoperative keratometry readings was recorded by manual keratometry. After trabeculectomy, keratometry readings were recorded at the end of 1stday,1st week,1st month,3rd month,6th month and 12th month and also the effect of various factors like use of cautery and suturing in inducing corneal astigmatism were studied. Results: the present study showed that trabeculectomy induces corneal curvature changes resulted in with the rule astigmatism in majority of cases which maximum at the end of 1st week and 1st month post operatively. Thereafter those corneal curvatures decayed progressively, almost dissapering at the end of 12th postoperative month. Conclusion: the present study conclude that excessive cautery and suturing of the scleral flap were the factors responsible for the astigmatism at the end of 1st postoperative week and 1st postoperative month.

Key words: Glaucoma, Astigmatism, Trabeculectomy and Cautery.

 

INTRODUCTION

Astigmatism is a optical condition that can cause different visual functions like decreased vision, epiphora, unilateral diplopia, asthenopia and distortion1. Astigmatism may be regular or irregular, in regular Astigmatism, if vertical meridian is more curved than horizontal, it is with rule Astigmatism. If horizontal meridian is more curved than vertical meridian, it is against rule Astigmatism. This can corrected by prescription glasses, lenses, corneal releaxing incisions, astigmatic keratotomies, limbal relaxing incisions, excimer laser ablation and IOL implantation6. Trabeculectomy is a gold standard surgical procedure for progressive open angle glaucoma and also it is helpful for primary angle closure and certain secondary glaucomas in which medical line of treatment has failed8-9. It has been showed to control intraocular pressure especially in cases of open angle glaucoma. The basic mechanism of filtering surgery is to create a new drainage path way that allows aqueous to pass from the anterior chamber into the sub conjunctival space or directly into the tear film10. But this procedure resulted in altered visuval function induced by changes in corneal curvature11. This may be distressing to the patients particularly when changes are marked and continued beyond the few post operative months. Hence the present study evaluate the corneal astigmatism following trabeculectomy and analysis of factors responsible for corneal astigmatism in patients with glaucoma.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a Prospective Study conducted in Department of Ophthalmology at multiple centre and concluded at SS Institute of Medical Sciences and Research centre, Davanagere, Karnataka.A total 50 eyes 40 subjects are included in this study and all the subjects were recruited in the study after obtaining their informed consent after obtaining of ethical clearance from the institute. The inclusion criteria includes patients with primary open angle glaucoma uncontrolled with maximum medical therapy and             chronic primary angle closure glaucoma. Patients with congenital glaucoma, all secondary glaucoma’s, patients requiring  combined procedures along with trabeculectomy, primary angle closure glaucoma and whoever not willing to participate are excluded from these study. Detailed patients medical history was obtained and ocular examination include detailed anterior segment examination was carried out with slit lamp biomicroscope, Assessment of anterior chamber depth by oblique flash light test and van herick test technique. IOP was measured with goldmann applantation tonometer. Gonioscopy was performed using Goldman’s single mirror contact lens.  

Statistical Analysis: The normal distribution of data checked by using Kolmogorov Smirnov test. All the characters descriptively summarized. The mean and standard deviation about the arithmetic mean were used. Dependent variables should be normally distributed .The Data was compiled in Microsoft excel spread sheets and analyzed using SPSS for windows version 21.0. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.  

 

RESULTS

Table 1: Shows the Pre-Trab Intraocular Pressure 29 eyes (58%) had IOP between 26-30 mmHg preoperatively. Significantly more number of eyes were observed to have an IOP between at 26-30 mmHg, followed by 21-25 mmHg and least in 16-20 mmHg. CChi-square test revealed a significant difference among these frequencies ( X2= 49.40:P<0.0001**.

Table 2: Shows the first postoperative month keratometry readings compared to preoperative readings, at the end of 1st postoperative month showed with the rule change in 20 (80%) males and 17 (73.9%) females, against the rule change was seen in 2 (8%) males and 1 (4.4%) females. No change was observed in 3 (12%) males and 5 (21.7%) females, on comparing to their preoperative keratometry readings.

Table 3: shows the third postoperative month keratometric readings compared to preoperative readings, keratometry readings recorded at the end of 3rd postoperative month showed with the rule change in 16 (69.6%) males and 16 (72.7) females. Against the rule change was seen in 3 ( 13%) males and 4 (18.2%) females and no change was observed in 4 (17.4%) males and 4 (18.2%) females and no change was observed in 4 (17.4) males and 2 (9.1%) females,on comparing to their preoperative keratometry readings.

Table 4 shows sixth postoperative month keratometric readings compared to preoperative readings, with the rule change in 12 (52.2%) males and 9 (45%) females. Against the rule change was seen in 6 (26.1%) males and 9 (45%) females and no change was seen in 5 (21.7) males and 2(10%) females, on comparing to their preoperative keratometry readings.


 

Table 1: Shows the Pre-Trab Intraocular Pressure

IOP (mmHG)

No. of Eyes

Percentage

16-20

1

2

21-25

10

20

26-30

29

58

31-35

6

12

36-40

4

8

Total

50

100

 

Table 2 : Showed first month postoperative month keratometric readings compared to preoperative readings

Type of astigmatic change

Males

Females

Total

No. of Cases (%)

No. of Cases (%)

No. of Cases (%)

With the rule change

20 (80%)

17(73.9%)

37(77.1%)

Against the rule change

2(8%)

1(4.4%)

3 (6.2%)

No change

3(12%)

5 (21.7%)

8(16.7%)

Total

25(100%)

23 (100%)

48 (100%)

 

Table 3:Showed third month postoperative month keratometric readings compared to preoperative readings

Type of astigmatic change

Males

Females

Total

No. of Cases (%)

No. of Cases (%)

No. of Cases (%)

With the rule change

16 (69.6 %)

16(72.7%)

32 (71.1%)

Against the rule change

3 (13 %)

4 (18.2 %)

7 (15.6%)

No change

4 ( 17.4 %)

2 (9.1 %)

6 (13.3%)

Total

23 (100%)

22 (100%)

45 (100%)

 

 

Table 4:Showed sixth month postoperative month keratometric readings compared to preoperative readings

Type of astigmatic change

Males

Females

Total

No. of Cases (%)

No. of Cases (%)

No. of Cases (%)

With the rule change

12 (52.2%)

9 (45%)

21 (48.8 %)

Against the rule change

6 (26.1%)

9 (45%)

15 (34.9%)

No change

5 (21.7%)

2 (10 %)

7 (16.3 %)

Total

23 (100%)

20 (100%)

43 (100%)

 


DISCUSSION

This study demontrated that filtration surgery has a distinct effect on altered visuval function induced by changes in corneal curvature, which can be distressing to the patient particularly when changes are marked and continued beyond first few postoperative months12. There was a trend towards transient trabeculectomy induced astigmatism in the meridian of surgery13. Since trabeculectomy produce a form of wound gap, ATR would be expected postoperatively14. However this study as well as other studies have found a with the rule astigmatism following trabeculectomy. Similar studies found that this difference in behaviour might be the result of partial thickness scleral flap created during trabeculectomy. In trabeculectomy, a scleral flap overlies the surgically produced gap15-16. This is capable of spreading any support from the suture inserted into it, over the whole of the wound gape17.

In the present study, a triangular flap with an identical flap size was used in all the cases and thus the effect of variable flap shape and size could not be assessed. Thermal cautery was used instead of the presently used wet-field cautery. Releasable sutures were not used in this study. Manual keratometry was used instead, in the absence of the art technique of videokeratography. Despite these shortcomings, the present study has showed, mean change of keratometry readings after trabeculectomy at 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12 th month were 0.74, 0.58, 0.23, and 0.23 dioptre respectively. With maximum detectble change found at the end of 1st postoperative month and thereafter the changes were almost decaying and disappearing at the end of 12th postoperative month.  The present study showed at the end of 12th postoperative month, the keratometry readings were stabilized.              

CONCLUSION

 The present study concluded that excessive cautery and tight suturing of the flap are the main factors responsible for the with the rule astigmatism seen at the end of first postoperative month, and were not found significant at the end of 12th postoperative month. Hence restricting the use of cautery and avoiding tight suturing of the flap goes a long way in reducing the postoperative corneal astigmatism.

 

 

REFERENCE

  1. Abrahamsson M, Sjostrand J. Astigmatic axis and amblyopia in childhood. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003;81:33–7.
  2. Fulton AB, Hansen RM, Petersen RA. The relation of myopia and astigmatism in developing eyes. Ophthalmology. 1982;89:298–302.
  3. Gwiazda J, Grice K, Held R, McLellan J, Thorn F. Astigmatism and the development of myopia in children. Vis Res. 2000;40:1019–26.
  4. Huang JY, Maguire MG, Ciner E, et al. Risk factors for astigmatism in the vision in preschoolers study. Optometry Vision Sci. 2014;91:514–21.
  5. Wen G, Tarczy-Hornoch K, McKean-Cowdin R, et al. Prevalence of myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism in non-Hispanic white and Asian children: multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:2109–16.
  6. Wang J, Ying GS, Fu X, et al. Prevalence of myopia and vision impairment in school students in eastern China. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20:2.
  7. Li H, Li SM, Liu LR, et al. Astigmatism and its components in 12-year-old Chinese children: the Anyang childhood eye study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019; 103:768–74.
  8. Xiao X, Liu WM, Ye YJ, et al. Prevalence of high astigmatism in children aged 3 to 6 years in Guangxi, China. Optometry Vision Sci. 2014;91:390–6.
  9. T. W. Leung, A. K. Lam, and C. S. Kee, “Ocular aberrations and corneal shape in adults with and without astigmatism,” Optometry and Vision Science Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 604–614, 2015.
  10. M. P. Paquin, H. Hamam, and P. Simonet, “Objective measurement of optical aberrations in myopic eyes,” Optometry and Vision Science Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 285–291, 2002.
  11. G. P. De, C. Dorronsoro, E. Gambra, G. Marin, M. Hernández, and S. Marcos, “Combining coma with astigmatism can improve retinal image over astigmatism alone,” Vision Research, vol. 50, no. 19, pp. 2008–2014, 2010.
  12. E. A. Villegas, E. Alcón, and P. Artal, “Minimum amount of astigmatism that should be corrected,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 13–19, 2014.
  13. A. Carkeet, S. W. Leo, B. K. Khoo, and K. G. Au Eong, “Modulation transfer functions in children: pupil size dependence and meridional anisotropy,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 3248–3256, 2003.
  14. S. K. Choi and J. W. Chang, “Higher order aberration and astigmatism in children with hyperopic amblyopia,” Korean Journal of Ophthalmology Kjo, vol. 30, no. 1, p. 53, 2016.
  15. R. Cantú, M. A. Rosales, E. Tepichín, A. Curioca, V. Montes, and J. Bonilla, “Whole eye wavefront aberrations in Mexican male subjects,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 20, no. 5 Supplement, pp. S685–S688, 2004.
  16. K. Lee, M. A. Ji, E. K. Kim, and T. I. Kim, “Comparison of optical quality parameters and ocular aberrations after wavefrontguided laser in-situ keratomileusis versus wavefront-guided laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 251, no. 9, pp. 2163–2169, 2013.
  17. G. Savini, F. Versaci, G. Vestri, P. Ducoli, and K. Næser, “Influence of posterior corneal astigmatism on total corneal astigmatism in eyes with moderate to high astigmatism,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1645–1653, 2014.


 






























 








 




 








 

 









Policy for Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology (Print ISSN:2579-0900) (Online ISSN: 2636-4654) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.