Home About Us Contact Us

Official Journals By StatPerson Publication

Table of Content - Volume 11 Issue 1 - July 2019

Study of paediatric fractures at tertiary care hospital

 

Ghansham A Pol1*, Abhishek Ranjan2

 

1Assistant Professor, 2Junior Resident, RCSM Government Medical College and CPR Hospital, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, INDIA.

Email: drpol0404@gmail.com

 

Abstract               Background: Pediatric fracture is a major adverse event in life, significant cause of mortality, long term disability and causes significant emotional and financial burden on families. The types of fractures seen in paediatric age group are related to age, sex, type of trauma, socioeconomic and environment factors while outcome is based on initial management and definitive treatment. The detailed analysis of pediatric trauma can give us a possible insight into prevention and intervention to decrease the disability resulting from the same4. This clinical study aims to evaluate present scenario in paediatric fractures. Material and Methods: This hospital based observative, prospective, cross sectional study was in children up to 14 years of age came to casualty or orthopaedic out-patient departments of our hospital. Results: During study period total of 320, with 211 boys (65.94%) and 109 girls (34.06 %), male to female ratio of 1.94:1. 11-14 years age group was most common (61.87 %). The bones of radius and ulna were most common site of the fractures (45.31%) Majority of children were treated with cast of plaster of Paris with or without closed reduction (46.56 %). Conclusion: Paediatric fractures in developing countries contribute a significant morbidity to the community and along with additional burden to health resources. Knowledge and awareness are important factors in preventing fractures in children.

Keywords: Fracture, paediatric, management of paediatric fractures.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric fracture is a major adverse event in life, significant cause of mortality, long term disability and causes significant emotional and financial burden on families. Pediatric injuries are the major cause of mortality and disability worldwide and accounts for a significant burden on countries with limited resources1. The types of fractures seen in paediatric age group are related to age, sex, type of trauma, socioeconomic and environment factors while outcome is based on initial management and definitive treatment. Different studies estimated the lifetime risk of a fracture during childhood between 27-64%, paediatric fractures are more common in boys than girls2,3. In India exact estimation is not available, due to different reasons, as wide area, difference in urban and rural area, underreporting, many parents take treatment from quacks due to non-availability of money or experts in area, etc. Information on various aspects of paediatric fractures is needed for planning of effective preventive measures. There are few studies from developing countries regarding the prevalence and potential risk factors of pediatric fractures. The detailed analysis of pediatric trauma can give us a possible insight into prevention and intervention to decrease the disability resulting from the same4. This clinical study aims to evaluate present scenario in paediatric fractures.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This hospital based observative, prospective, cross sectional study was conducted in department of orthopaedics at Rajarshee Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj Govt. Medical College and Chhatrapati Pramila Raje Hospital, Kolhapur from January 2018 to December 2018. Institutional ethical committee approval taken before commencement of study.

  1. Inclusion criteria - children up to 14 years of age came to casualty or orthopaedic out-patient departments of our hospital.
  2. Exclusion criteria - presence of known factors that affect bone and mineral metabolism as some pathologies or receiving treatment known to affect bone and mineral metabolism.

Data collected after written informed consent from parents or guardian. Data collected in prescribed Performa designed for this study. Data contains details of trauma, demographic details, clinical findings, investigations as X-ray, CT scan, laboratory workup, treatment received, any complications and follow up for 6 months. All data was arranged in Microsoft excel sheet and analysed with appropriate tools.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Table 1:

Characteristics

Frequency

Percentage (%)

  1. Gender

Boys

211

65.94

Girls

109

34.06

  1. Age

0-5 years

20

6.25

6-10 years

102

31.88

11-14 years

198

61.87

  1. Residence

Rural

131

40.94

Urban

189

59.06

  1. Socioeconomic status*

Class 1

38

11.87

Class 2

47

14.69

Class 3

49

15.31

Class 4

71

22.19

Class 5

109

34.04

As children are engaged in various outdoor games, plays, road travelling they are always exposed to risk of trauma. Fractures are common and comprises of about 10-25% of all paediatric injuries and cause significant morbidity5,6. Effects of paediatric trauma can be seen at various aspects in terms of loss of school activity, morbidity, financial burden and sometimes lifelong disability. During study period total of 320 children were diagnosed with fracture, either in casualty or in orthopaedic OPD of our hospital. There were 211 boys (65.94%) and 109 girls (34.06%), male to female ratio of 1.94:1. When fracture distribution was compared agewise, 11-14 years age group was most common (61.87%), followed by 6-10 years age group (31.88%) and 0-5 years age group (6.25%). Overall boys were predominant with the ratio of 1.94:1 to girls and common occurrence in school going children is similar with other studies reporting similar findings7,8. This predominance is mainly due to more social activity and risk taking behaviour among boys with increasing age.

Difference in incidence of paediatric fractures in urban and rural area was noted, common in urban area (59.06%) compared to rural area (40.94 %). Difference might be due to increase incidence of road traffic accidents in urban area and under-reporting in rural area. More frequency of paediatric fracture noted in lower socioeconomic class, might be due to low awareness of fracture prevention practices.


 

Table 2:

Bone Fractured

Number

Percentage (%)

Radius and Ulna

145

45.31

Humerus

90

28.12

Tibia and Fibula

28

8.75

Femur

19

5.94

Clavicle

23

7.20

Others

15

4.68

Total

320

100

The bones of radius and ulna were most common site of the fractures (45.31%) which was consistent with other studies9,10. Other fracture sites were humerus, tibia and fibula, clavicle, femur, others in frequency of 28.12%, 8.75%, 7.20%, 5.94%, 4.68% respectively. Fracture incidence in other bones was more variable because of type of classification and upper age limit of children.

 

 

 

Table 3: Type of Intervention

Treatment Method

Number

Percentage (%)

Cast only

88

27.5

Closed Reduction and cast

61

19.06

K-Wires

50

15.62

Plate and Screws

38

11.87

Skeletal Traction

22

6.87

Elastic Nails

18

5.62

Hip Spica

18

5.62

Cannulated Screws

14

4.37

External Fixator

11

3.44

320

100

 


Majority of children were treated with cast of plaster of Paris with or without closed reduction (46.56%). Rest required various procedures as K-Wires, plate and screws, skeletal traction, elastic nails, hip spica, cannulated screws, external fixator under appropriate anesthesia. Early stabilization followed by aggressive treatment had very positive results, with very minimal complications. Unfortunately mortality was noted in 6 patients, all were having road traffic accident, multiple injuries, succumbed due to hemorrhage mainly.

 

CONCLUSION

Paediatric fractures in developing countries contribute a significant morbidity to the community and along with additional burden to health resources. Knowledge and awareness are important factors in preventing fractures in children and needs some serious efforts at nationwide level. Such campaigns definitely reduce paediatric trauma and its future effects on our young generation.

 

REFERENCES

  1. WHO/UNICEF. Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention: A Global Call to Action. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2005.
  2. Jones IE, Williams SM, Dow N, et al. How Many Children Remain Fracture-free During Growth? A Longitudinal Study of Children and Adolescents Participating in the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study. Osteoporos Int 2002; 13(12): 990-5.
  3. Donaldson LJ, Reckless IP, Mindell JS, et al. The Epidemiology of Fractures in England. J Epidemiol Community Health 2008; 62(2): 174-80.
  4. Hatamabadi HR, Mahfoozpour S, Alimohammadi H, Younesian S. Evaluation of factors influencing knowledge and attitudes of mothers with preschool children regarding their adoption of preventive measures for home injuries referred to academic emergency centres, Tehran, Iran. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot 2014;21:2529.
  5. Asim A Mohamed NFR, Rukmanikanthan S. Pattern of distal radius fracture in Malaysian children. Med J Malaysia. 2012;67(5):483-6.
  6. Ramaesh, R, Clement N. D, Rennie L. Social deprivation as a risk factor for fractures in childhood. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B:240-5.
  7. Moon RJ, Harvey NC, Curtis EM et al. Ethnic and geographic variations in the epidemiology of childhood fractures in the United Kingdom. Bone. 2016;85:9-14.
  8. Tandon MS, Modi N. Paediatric trauma epidemiology in an urban scenario in India. J Orthopaedic Surg. 2007;15(1):41-5.
  9. Deakin DE, Crosby JM, Moran CG, Chell. Childhood fractures requiring inpatient Management. Injury 2007; 38: 1241–46.
  10. Rennie L, Court-Brown CM, Mok JY, Beattie TF. The epidemiology of fractures in children. Injury 2007; 38: 913-22.