Home About Us Contact Us

Official Journals By StatPerson Publication

Table of Content - Volume 13 Issue 1 - January 2020

 

Dynamic hip screw fixation trochanteric fractures of femur

 

Avinash Kumar

 

Senior Resident, Department of Orthopedics, M.G.M. Medical College and L.S.K. Hospital, Kishanganj, Bihar, INDIA.

Email: kajal6160@gmail.com

 

Abstract               Background: Trochanteric fractures of proximal femur is common in old aged, osteoporotic people, most of them are elderly women than men. It is caused either by a indirect twisting injury or fall directly onto the greater trochanter. Methods: This study was conducted in Department of Orthopaedic, M.G.M. Medical College and L.S.K. Hospital. Kishanganj, Bihar Patient with age 30 years or more with tronchanteric fracture of femur were isolated or with other injury were included duration the period from January2018 to June2018. Total 30 patients were included in our study. Results: Range of the age of the patients was 32 – 75 years. Average age was 56.25 years. Male: Female ratio was 1:2.07. Commonest mode of injury was minor slip-overall 53.3%. Second commonest was RTA (26.7%). All the Patients in Post operative period were allowed to sit on 3rd day. Patients were discharged in between 7-14 days from the day of operation; stitches were removed on 12-16th day on average. Most of the patients (30) were free from pain during weight bearing. Only 2 patients (6.7%) having significance shortening more than 2.3 cm. Conclusion: Dynamic Hip Screw fixation has been still a popular method of internal fixation for intertrochanteric fracture and is specially indicated when trochanteric fracture involving pyriformis fossa. Soit was successful methods are available for internal fixation of different types of trochanteric fractures.

Key Words:

 INTRODUCTION

The relationship between hip fracture type and individual health status (including number of co-morbidities and activity level) is controversial according to some studies, trochanteric fracture patients are biologically older than those who sustain a femoral neck fracture and that they had low general health and hospital admission, poorer pre fracture ambulatory ability and higher number of associated medical conditions that affected fracture management 1

There are four conditions must occur if a simple fall resulted in hip fracture incorporating trochanteric fractures:

  • The orientation of the fall must lead to an impact at or near the hip.
  • Protective responses are too weak or slow to adequately reduce the potential energy of the fall.
  • The soft tissues around the hip are unable to absorb adequate energy.
  • The bone strength is inadequate to tolerate the remaining forces that reach the hip2.

Undisplaced trochanteric fractures can be much more difficult to diagnose accurately from the initial clinical and radiographic evaluation. Repeated orthogonal radiographs with the hip in internal rotation may be helpful to demonstrate the fracture line. Further diagnosis may include the CT scan, technetium bone scan or MRI, however these are not used in this study3. Fractures that occur in young people are usually due to road traffic accident and fall from heights and resulted in a much larger energy transfer to the bone. There is invariably more soft-tissue injury, with significantly more fracture displacement and fragmentation than in the geriatric population the initial evaluation, history and examination follow Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines, and additional fractures, as well as injuries to other organ systems, must be actively looked for and ruled out4. Increased fracture fragmentations around trochanteric region and particularly the fractures in the coronal plane are not well appreciated on routine radiographs, further evaluation including superior investigations may be needed in these situations5.

 

METHODS

This study was conducted in Department of Orthopaedic, M.G.M. Medical College and L.S.K. Hospital. Kishanganj, Bihar Patient with age 30 years or more with tronchanteric fracture of femur were isolated or with other injury were included duration the period from January2018 to June2018. Total 30 patients were included in this study.

Implants

DHS Plate are made up of 316 L stain less steel with screw hole as per length of the plate. It has a low profile design reducing risk of trochanteric bursitis. These are available in a wide range of size and barrel angle, with standard or short barrels, for varied clinical situation.

DHS – standard barrel plate (38 mm) Barrel angle:135º/140º/145º/150º

No of hole

Shaft Length (mm)

2

46

4

78

5

94

6

110

8

142

10

174

12

206

14

238

16

270

18

302

20

333

DHS- Short barrel (25 mm barrel) Barrel angle:135º/ 140º/145º/150º

No of hole

Shaft length(mm)

4

78

5

94

6

110


DHS Lag screw

Thread diameter              : 12.7 mm

Thread Length   : 22 mm/16 mm

Shaft diameter : 8 mm

Pitch      : 3.0 mm

Diameter of cannulation: 2.7 mm

Available from 50 to 145 mm of length.

 

 

RESULTS

Among 30 cases of trochanteric fractures of femur, most of them were purely intertrochanteric fractures while some of them were intertrochanteric with subtrochanteric extention.

All these patients were followed up for 6 month at 6th, 12th, 18th and 24th week.

Table 1: Age Distribution

Age Group

No of Cases

Percentage (%)

30-40 Years

2

6.7

41- 50 years

5

16.7

51-60 years

8

26.6

60-70 years

10

33.3

>70 Years

05

16.7

Total

30

100

Range of the age of the patients was 32 – 75 years. Average age was 56.25 years.

 

Table 2: Sex incidence

Sex

No of cases

Percentage (%)

Male

11

36.7

Female

19

63.3

Total

30

100

In this study female was predominantly higher th

Table 3: Modes of injury

Mode of Injury

No. of cases

Percentage (%)

Minor slip or stumble

16

53.3

Fall from Height

2

6.7

Major Trauma

4

13.3

RTA

8

26.7

Total

30

100

Above observation of modes of injury. Commonest mode of injury was minor slip-overall 53.3%. Second commonest was RTA (26.7%).

 

Table 4: According to Evan’s classification

Type (Evan’s classification)

Non of cases

Percentage

Type I:

 

 

Undisplaced

02

6.7

Displaced stable medial cortical apposition

11

36.7

Displaced unstable no apposition

03

10.0

Comminuted

8

26.6

Type II

6

20.0

Total

30

100

Out of 30 cases 24 (80.0%) were type 1 and 6 cases (20.0%) were type 2 (Evan’s) fractures.

 

Table 5: Operative time

Time

No. of Cases

Percentage (%)

1 – 1.5 hours

4

13.3

1.5 – 2 hours

17

56.7

2 – 2.5 hours

9

30.0

Most of the patients operated within 1.5 – 2 hours. i.e 17 (56.7%) patients.

an male, the male and female ratio-1:1.72.

Table 6: Clinical union

Post operative

weeks

Status of clinical union (No. of cases)

Swelling

Local Bony tenderness

Absent

Present

Absent

Present

6th week

20

10

2

28

12th week

25

5

22

8

18th week

29

01

30

00

24th week

30

00

30

00

Local swelling at fracture site present only 10 cases at 6th post operative weeks. Almost all local selling absent around 12 – 18 weeks. Local bony tenderness disappears around at 18 – 20 weeks.

Table 7: Weight bearing ability

Time interval in weeks

No. of cases

Partial weight

bearing

Partial weight

bearing

6th

08

00

12th

18

00

18th

24

08

24th

30

22

At 6th post operative week only 08 patients were allowed Partial weight bearing. Almost all patients (except one patient with proximal cut through of hip screw) were allowed 22 patients were capable Full weight bearing at 24th week. All the Patients in Post operative period were allowed to sit on 3rd day. Static quadriceps, Hamstring exercises are started. Non weight bearing crutch walking was advised depending upon the general condition of the patients and quality of fixation. Sometimes derotation shoe/plaster were given when any doubt regarding stability of int. fixation. Patients were discharged in between 10-20 days from the day of operation; stitches were removed on 12-18th day on average. Most of the patients (22) were free from pain during weight bearing Only 2 patients (6.7%) having significance shortening more than 2.3 cm.

 

DISCUSSION

Among DHS/DCS/Intramedullary devices fixation in trochanteric fracture, placement of DHS may be a simple job according to some study26. But it may become more easier by presence of following factors like timely surgery, judiuous planning of surgery, reduction technique, proper used of C-arm image intensifier, experience of the surgical team etc6. Dynamic hip screw as stated before is a alternative in Type II (Evan’s classification) trochanteric fractures7. This category of fracture along with unstable variety of trochanteric/peritrochanteric fractures can be fixed with 135o DHS; inter trochanteric osteotomy followed by intra medullary fixation to achieve proper restoration of medial continuity8. Therefore it has been concluded that Evan’s Type II factures are distal and parallal to the position of a 1350 sliding screw, therefore fragment will not impact into a local sharing configuration, resulting in distal fragment tends to medialize. As a result of malunion occurred. But recently better devices are available for fixation of type II fractures. However, our main aims was to assess the outcome of DHS fixation, to achieve early mobilization, union at fracture site and finally rehabilitation. In our study, we perform a prospective study, in Dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation in trochanteric fracture of femure. We encountered severe shortening (> 2.3 cm) in only two-cases (6.7%) in DHS series, but moderate shortening (1-2.5 cm) was found in 13 cases (32.50%). Shortening are mainly due to collapse at fracture site or deformity. Union was evaluated by both clinically (swelling and bony tenderness) and radiologically bridged by callus. In this series the average time of union 24th weeks in DHS series

Apart form the problems and complications as stated above, the over all results according to Harris hip score, are as follows:-

  • Good                     :               20 (66.7%)
  • Average               :               :               08 (26.7%)
  • Poor                      :               2 (6.7%)

In the present series, study was done on limited number (30) of cases. However the functional result is good in majority of cases.

 

CONCLUSION

In present study it is concluded that dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation is technically simple but effective procedure for fixation of inter trochanteric fracture of femur. Dynamic Hip Screw fixation has been still a popular method of internal fixation for intertrochanteric fracture and is specially indicated when trochanteric fracture involving pyriformis fossa. Soit was successful methods are available for internal fixation of different types of trochanteric fractures.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Hwang LC, Lo WH, Chen WM, et al: Intertrochanteric fractures in adults younger than 40 years of age, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121:123,2001.
  2. Alexa O, Sirbu P, Georgescu N, Acta Orthop Scand 38 : 2, 1998.
  3. Kyle RF, Gustilo RB, Premer RF: Analysis of trochanteric fracture a retrospective and Prospective study. JBJS 61 A: 216-21; 1979.
  4. Blatter G, Janssen M., J. Bone Joint Surg 73C : 390, 1994.
  5. Lunsjo K, Ceder L, Tidermark j, Hamberg P, Injury 26 : 411, 1999.
  6. Mariani EM, Rand JA: No union of inter trochanteric fractures of the femur following open reduction and internal fixation. Clin Orthop 245: 165-68, 1989.
  7. Spivak JM, Zuckerman JD, Kummer FJ, Frankel VH : Fatigue failure of the sliding screw in hip fracture fixation : a report of three cases, J Orthop Trauma 5 : 325, 1991.
  8. Barrios C, Walheim G, Borstrom LA et al: Walking ability after internal fixation of trochanteric fractures with Ender nails or sliding screw plate-a comparative study on gait Clin Orthop 294: 197-292, 1993.


Policy for Articles with Open Access:
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Orthopedics, (Print ISSN: 2579-0889, Online) (ISSN: 2636-4638) agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.