Home About Us Contact Us
`

 

Table of Content - Volume 18 Issue 3 - June 2021


 

Pattern of bone fractures occurring in the paediatric population of tertiary care hospital

 

P Siva Rama Krishna1*, K Rohit Kumar2

 

1Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Viswabharathi Medical College, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.

2MBBS, NRI Medical College, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.

Email: sivaramps76@gmail.com, kompallirohit@gmail.com

 

Abstract              Background: In paediatric age group, Fractures are a main reason of emergency presentation and they have fine prognosis because of auto-correction of insufficient fracture reduction by bone remodeling. The present study is done to determine the pattern of bone fractures occurring in the paediatric population of tertiary care hospital. Methods: a cross sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital from December 2019 and November 2020. children between the age of 2 to 14 years were included in the study. demographic data, mechanism of injury, fracture patterns and treatment details were collected in the form of questionnaires in the prescribed proforma. data were analysed using SPSS version 12. Results: out of 123 paediatric patients 87 (70.5%) were males and 36 (29.5%) were females. The mean age of patients was 8.5 ± 2.3 years. The most vulnerable group was between 6 to 10 years. The main cause of injury was fall from height. Forearm fracture was the most common fractures. 89.5% (110 cases) were managed conservatively and 10.5% (13 cases) were managed operatively Conclusion: it is concluded that the common mechanism of fracture was fall. It is believed that in order to reduce the incidence of paediatric fractures, health care professionals are supposed to give community based education on prevention strategies.

Key words: paediatric fracture, supracondylar fracture, fall, Road traffic accident (RTA)

 

INTRODUCTION

In paediatric age group, Fractures are a main reason of emergency presentation and constitute 9% cause of healthcare contribution in children1.the cause of these fracture differ from accidental falls The mechanisms of these injuries differ from accidental falls which occurred in the course of fun activities to road traffic accidents. Non-operative management is the mainstay of treatment of paediatric fractures, with reported good outcomes owing to the active remodelling potential of children's periosteum which speeds up the fracture healing process.3,4 Less frequently, Some paeditric fractures require surgical intervention namely; open fractures, lateral condyle fractures of humerus, displaced supracondylar humeral fractures, femoral fractures in school aged children and the presence of associated injuries like head trauma or vascular lesion.2,5It is essential to study the pattern of children's fractures as it leads to developing preventive strategies. The purpose of studying the etiology of injuries, and the circumstances and settings in which they occur is to identify risky behaviors or an unsafe environment which can be corrected by specific preventive measures. The present study was conducted to find out the causes, patterns and treatment of bone fractures among the paediatric population at tertiary care hospital.

 

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Orthopedics, SVS Medical college, MahbubNagar, Telangana between January 2020 to August 2020. Approval for this study was taken from the Institutional Ethics Committee and written informed consent was obtained from all participants and/or their parents or legal guardians. A total 123 patients were included for this study. The inclusion criteria were children from 2 years of age up to 14 years of age. Exclusion criteria were those patients who are not willing to participate and who were first treated in another health care. In the prescribed proforma, data regarding the characteristics of all patients and their fracture patterns was collected. A detailed examination was done and the details of the trauma were recorded with regards to time, place, mode of injury, type of injury, site of trauma, place of trauma, and plan of treatment. From the data collected, demographic data, mechanism of injury, fracture characteristics and type of treatment were analyzed. Data were analysed by using SPSS, version 18.0. categorical variables were represented as percentages and continuous data were represented as Mean±SD.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics and clinical presentation: A total of 123 children were included in this study. There were 87 (70.5%) males and 36(29.5%) females. The mean age of children was 8.5 ± 2.3 Years. The most vulnerable group was between 6 to 10 years.table-1

Table 1: distribution of patients according to age

Age in years

Frequency (123)

Percentage (%)

2-5 years

31

25

6-10 years

68

55

11-14 years

24

20

The most common mechanisms of injury were Falls, RTA and others

falls in 77 cases (53.1%) follow by rta 26 (17.9%) road traffic accidents, and 6 (4.1%) others as depicted in Table 2.

Table 2: distribution of patients according to the mechanism of injury

Mechanism of injury

Frequency (n=123)

Percentage (%)

falls

68

55.2

Road traffic accidents

52

42.3

others

3

2.5

With regards to fracture location, the forearm was the most involved with 55 (45%) cases followed by 37 (25.5%) humeral and 23 (16%) femoral fractures (Table 3).

Table 3: distribution of patients according to the fracture site

Fracture site

Frequency (n=123)

Percentage (%)

Forearm

55

45

Humerus

34

28

Clavicle

07

5

Femur

15

12

Leg

12

10

Therapeutic patterns : With respect to the treatment of the 123 fractures; 110 (89.5%) were managed conservatively and the remaining 13 (10.5%) were managed operatively. The most surgically reduced fractures were supracondylar humeral fractures.

.

DISCUSSION

Fractures have a remarkable physical, psychosocial and financial strain on both the kids and their parents. Of all paediatric injuries, 10-25% is constituted by Fractures and cause significant morbidity.6,7 In our study, fracture distribution, mechanism of injuries, fracture site and treatment were studied among the paediatric population. In this study predominance of males over females was observed. Janmohammadi et al. reported that incidence of fracture was more in males.8 Valerio g etal. In their study also reported the same.9 male being more active and indulge in more physical activities are more prone to trauma. In our study it was observed that 80% of paediatric fractures were upper limb fractures which was reported by previous epidemiological study also.10 in our study it was found that fore arm bones were the most commonly fractured bones. Sharat Agarwal.11 in his study reported the same. Valerio et al.9 in their study reported that distal radius was the most commonly fractured bone followed by a radial shaft. In Our study it was found that the commonest form of injury for fracture was fall. Chen et al.12 in their study reported the same.

 

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provided valuable epidemiological data about pediatric fractures. Parents need to be sensitized on preventive etiologies so as to be more vigilant leading to effective fracture prevention.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Hedstrom EM, Svensson O, Bergstrom U, Michno P, Epidemiology of fractures in children and adolescents. Acta Orthop 2010;81:148-153
  2. Heinrich Stephen, Drvaric David, Darr Kevin, MacEwen Dean G. The operative stabilization of pediatric diaphyseal Femur Fractures with Flexible Intramedullary Nails: a prospective analysis. Journal of PediatricOrthopaedics. 1994; 14(4): 501- 7.
  3. Fractures de l'enfant monographies du groupe d'étude en orthopedie pédiatrique. Montpellier Sauramps Medical. 2002; 213-221
  4. NdomaNgatchoukpo V, Gaudeuille A, Journeau P. Traitement orthopédiques des fractures déplacés du quart inférieur du radius chez l'enfant. Rev Cames Sante.2014; 2(1): 9- 13.
  5. Tolo VT. Orthopaedic treatment of fractures of the long bones and pelvis in children who have multiple injuries. Instr Course Lect. 2000; 49: 415-23.
  6. Asim A Mohamed NFR, Rukmanikanthan S. Pattern of distal radius fracture in Malaysian children. Med J Malaysia. 2012;67(5):483-6.
  7. Ramaesh, R, Clement N. D, Rennie L. Social deprivation as a risk factor for fractures in childhood. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B:240-5.
  8. Janmohammadi N, Montazeri M, Akbarnezhad E. The epidemiology of extremity fracture in trauma patient of Shahid Beheshti hospital Babol. Iran J Emerg Med 2014;1:34‑9.
  9. Giuliana Valerio 1Francesca GallèCaterina Mancusiet al. Pattern of fractures across pediatric age groups: Analysis of individual and lifestyle factors. BMC Public Health 2020;10:656
  10. Rennie L, Court-Brown CM, Mok JY, Beattie TF. The epidemiology of fractures in children. Injury. 2007;38:913-22
  11. Agarwal S. A prospective hospital based study of childhood orthopaedic problems- A Case series. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8(12):1-3
  12. Chen W, Lv H, Liu S, Liu B, Zhu Y, Chen X, et al. National incidence of traumatic fractures in China: A retrospective survey of 512 187 individuals. Lancet Glob Health 2017;5:e807‑17.























 








 




 








 

 









Policy for Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology (Print ISSN:2579-0900) (Online ISSN: 2636-4654) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.