Home About Us Contact Us

Official Journals By StatPerson Publication

Table of Content - Volume 3 Issue 3 - September2017


A randomized controlled trial comparing outcomes of k wire removal at 4 weeks vs. 6 weeks of lateral condyle fractures of humerus in children

 

Rishabh Kumar1, Santosh Kumar2*, Nishant Kashyap3, Anand Shankar4

 

1Sr. Resident, 2Professor and HOD, 3Sr. Resident, 4Sr. Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, IGIMS, Patna-800014, Bihar, INDIA.

Email: drrishabh2005@gmail.com, drsantoshigimsortho@gmail.com, jhini98@gmail.com, drshanka@gmail.com

 

Abstract               Background and Objectives: Lateral condyle humerus fractures are the most common distal humeral fractures in children. They are associated with higher rate of complications and the results of non-operative management are associated with high rate of later displacement. So a randomised controlled trial comparing outcomes of K-wire removal at four weeks vs. six weeks of lateral condyle fractures of humerus in children was done. Methods: All patients aged one to fourteen years with traumatic fractures of the lateral condyle fracture of humerus presenting to the Department of Orthopaedics, IGIMS giving written consent for the trial were included in the study and randomised in two groups. Fractures more than seven days old were excluded. Cases taken were randomised according to random excel number generation. After open reduction and internal fixation the k-wire removed at four weeks in one group and at six weeks in another group. The clinico-radiological outcomes were evaluated for infection and radiological union. Collected data were evaluated and various statistical tests applied. P-value of less than 0.05 was taken as significant. Results: We found no statistically significant difference in comparison of union or infection with different age groups (p<0.05). Three patients developed skin infection, one in group A and two in group B. All patients did show radiological union at the expected time of k-wire removal two in group A one in group B. Conclusion: Our study has shown that fracture of lateral condyle of humerus united earlier than 6 weeks and shows no significant difference in short term outcome of K-wire and back slab removal at 4 weeks or at 6 weeks regarding union and infection.

Key Words: k wire, fracture of humerus.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

Fracture of the lateral condyle of the humerus constitutes 10% to 15 % of elbow injuries with the peak occurring at the age of 6-7 years1-8. Pediatric elbow fractures are different from many other pediatric injuries. They are associated with relatively high rate of complications and the results of non operative management are not always good. The child’s elbow is well vascularized and therefore fracture healing takes place very quickly. Such a narrow window of opportunity makes it imperative that the fracture be properly managed very quickly9. The attached extensor muscles displace the fragment from its bed to varying degree. causing displacement which varies from a downward, lateral and usually also backwards with or without rotation of the fragment10. The extent of injury may not be appreciated on x-ray because most of the distal humeral epiphysis is still cartilaginous. In such situations it is helpful to make x-ray of the normal elbow and compare the two sides, paying particular attention to the relationship (alignment) of the long axis of radius, the capitular ossific nucleus and humerus10. Some authors have advised non-operative treatment for closed undispalced fractures and open reduction and K-wire fixation for displaced fractures1,9,11-15. However in later studies by some other authors emphasized the importance of open reduction and K-wire fixation over closed reduction and POP slab application even in undisplaced fractures9,10,16,17-22. They found better results after operative management instead of non-operative management. There is controversy in removal of K-wire at 3-4 weeks or 6 weeks after operative fixation. Few of them remove K-wire at 6 weeks9-12,14,23 and others remove in 3-4 weeks1,2,13,15,24,25. Those who remove the K-wires in 3-4 weeks find that there is less number of infection rates, lesser degree of stiffness and lesser time was required to achieve almost full ROM of elbow joint. Studies have been done in the West which compare the outcomes of removal of K-wires at 3-4 and 6 weeks in the fixation of lateral condyle fracture of humerus in children. The authors have found no significant difference. But the general practice is to remove the K-wires at 6 weeks. If a study here in our setup also shows the same results then we also could remove the K-wires at 4 weeks with the advantage of less infection rates, early mobilization and lesser chance of stiffness.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics, IGIMS, a tertiary care hospital in Patna, over a period of twelve months from August 2016 to July 2017.

Inclusion Criteria: All patients aged 1 to 14 years with traumatic fractures of the lateral condyle fracture of humerus giving written consent for the trial, fit for anaesthesia, without other distal humeral fracture, without any systemic disease likely to affect the outcome were included in the study. Allocation was randomized using Excel random number generation technique into two groups:- Group A: Removal of K-wire and back slab in 4weeks Group B: Removal of K-wire and back slab in 6 weeks. Following fitness for anesthesia, patients of this group were taken up for surgery and underwent open reduction by lateral approach to elbow and two cross K-wire fixation.

Follow Up: After the surgery any immediate post-operative complications were taken into account. They were discharged after 2 days of antibiotics on POP slab, general condition permitting. After discharge all patients were reviewed after 2 weeks for inspection of surgical site whether any infection present or not, if not then sutures were removed. Group A patients were followed up again at 4 weeks for radiological union, signs of infection, K-wire and back slab removal and physiotherapy. At 6 weeks group B patients were followed up for radiological union, signs of infection, K-wire and back slab removal and physiotherapy. Group A patients were again followed up at 6 weeks to observe any deformity. At 12weeks both groups were followed to observe any deformity.

Statistical Analysis: A student ‘t’ test and 95 % confidence intervals were used to evaluate the difference between the two treatment groups with respect to numerical variables including age, time from injury to hospital.
OBSERVATION AND RESULTS

Table A1: Correlation between age gr. and study gr.

Age group in years

Study group

Total

%

A

B

≤5

13

11

24

38.57

6-10

18

19

37

52.85

>10

4

5

9

8.58

Total

35

35

70

100

Our study shows that most of the patients are male in both the study groups. There is no significant correlation between age and sex with study group showing success of randomization.

 

Table B1: Comparison of mode of injury with study gr.

Mode of injury

Study group

Total

%

A

B

Fall while playing

23

21

44

62.85

Fall from height

12

14

26

37.15

Total

35

35

70

100

Our study shows that Milch type II fracture is much more common than Milch type I in both the study groups.

 

TableB2: Comparison between type of # and age gr.

Type of fracture

Age group

Total

%

≤5

6-10

>10

Milch I

5

3

1

9

12.86

Milch II

19

34

8

61

87.14

Total

24

37

9

70

100

 

Table B3: Comparison of injury to hospital time

Injury to hospital delay

Study group

Total

%

A

B

Within 24 hours

19

18

37

52.86

After 24 hours

16

17

33

47.14

Total

35

35

70

100

 

Table C1: Comparison of infection at 2 weeks with study group

Infection at 2 weeks

Study group

Total

%

A

B

No

34

32

66

94.28

Yes

1

3

4

5.72

Total

35

35

70

100

 

Table C2: Comparison of infection at the time of K-wire removal with study group

Infection

Study group

Total

%

A

B

No

34

33

67

95.71

Yes

1

2

3

4.29

Total

35

35

70

100

Table D1: Comparison of Union with study group

Union

Study group

Total

%

A

B

Yes

32

33

65

95.6

No

2

1

3

4.4

Total

34

34

68

100

 

Table D2: Comparison of type of fracture with union

Union

Type of fracture

Total

%

Milch I

Milch II

 

 

Yes

8

58

66

94.28

No

1

3

4

5.72

Total

9

61

70

100

Table D3: Comparison of union in different age groups

Union

Age Group in years

Total

%

≤5

6-10

>10

Yes

24

36

7

67

95.71

No

0

1

2

3

4.29

Total

24

37

9

70

100


There was no intra-op and immediate post-op complication noted. At the end of 12 weeks of follow up, there was no deformity seen in any case, all cases regained almost comparable range of motion with normal side.


 

1

Figure 1: (Radiographic picture) A: Pre op showing Fracture (B): Showing post-op pic (C): Showing 6 wks post-op (after K-wire removal)

 

2

Figure 2: (Radiographic picture) G: Pre op showing Fracture (H): Showing immediate post-op radiograph (I): Showing 4wks post-op showing signs of union.

 


DISCUSSION

Our study shows the mean age of incidence to be 7.05 ± 2.78 years. Our study shows that about 14 % of cases of elbow injuries in children is showing lateral condyle fracture of humerus. Most of the patients were male in our study. In one study all the patients were male.7 About 37 percent of the total patients had injury by fall from 4-6 feet height which highly corroborates with the mode of injury by fall from monkey bars (usual height is 4-6 feet) in a study.26 In contrast to this finding one study shows that fall from height (bicycle 33 percent, tree 16 percent and monkey bar 16 percent) is more common mode of injury.13 Milch type II fracture was more common than Milch type I fracture in total patients in my study. Involvement of left side (number of cases 41) of humerus is more than the right side (number of cases 29) out of total seventy cases in our study. This finding has also been described in other studies.7,15,17,27 In our study out of seventy cases more than half of the patients (37 patients 52.86 percent) reached within 24 hours of injury and were treated on the same day on emergency basis. Rest of the patients reached to hospital after 24 hours but operated within 7 days. Those patients who came after 7 days of injury were excluded from the study. In one of the studies 25 patients (24percent) were treated on same day of injury, 62 patients (60 percent) were treated next day, Between 2-7 days 12 patients (11 percent) were treated and only 5 patients (about 5 percent) were treated within 8-17 days of injury.26 One of the studies excluded all the patients who underwent operative fixation after 14 days.28 In contrast to these studies one study treated 12 patients between 1-4 weeks, 5 patients between 5-8 weeks and 5 patients between 9-12 weeks.24 There are other studies in which fixation of fracture has been done after 3 weeks of injury.7,29 Comparison of infection has been done in different study groups at the time of suture removal and at the time of K-wire removal. It has been found that only one patient in study group A and 3 cases in study group B shows signs of superficial infection at the time of suture removal i.e. 2 weeks. These cases were successfully treated with wound dressing and intravenous antibiotics successfully. One of the previous studies in which K-wire and back slab was removed in 3-4 weeks as our group A had one case of superficial infection which resolved with antibiotics.26 Other studies in which K-wires and back slab/cast was removed at 3-4 weeks found no infection in their patients.13,27 One of the studies who removed K-wire and back slab at 6 weeks as our group B found three cases of pin tract infection which were treated successfully by oral antibiotics.24 Other studies who removed K-wire and back slab/cast at or after 6 weeks had no cases of infection.15,28 In our study there were only one cases in study group A which did not show radiological union at 4 weeks but on further follow up both cases had radiological union at 6thweek. There was one case which does not had radiological union at 3rd week in one of the previous studies as our group A. K-wire reinserted for 2 more weeks but still there was no radiological union. Finally fracture united after fixation with cannulated screw across the metaphyseal fragment of the lateral condyle into the distal metaphysis of the humerus.26 There was only one case which did not show radiological union in study group B at the end of sixth week, on further follow up at 12th week the fracture was radiologically united. All of the cases had radiological union at the end of six weeks in other studies.15,28 In contrast to above studies the average time period of radiological union in one of the previous studies was 8 weeks.24 Our study clearly shows that all the cases that does not had radiological union at the time of K-wire removal according to their respective study group belongs to age group of greater than 10 years. No study was found comparing these two parameters.

 

CONCLUSION

Our study has shown that fracture of lateral condyle of humerus united earlier than 6 weeks and shows no significant difference in short term outcome of K-wire and back slab removal at 4 weeks or at 6 weeks regarding union and infection. Further evaluation of short term as well as long term outcome is needed with more number of cases in various aspects.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Canale ST, Beaty J. Elbow joint fracture and dislocation. In: Campbell’s operative Orthopaedics. 11th ed. Memphis (Tennessee): Mosby Elsevier; 2008. p. 1569-1574.
  2. Tamai J, Lou J, Nagda S et al. Pediatric elbow fractures: Pearls and pitfalls. J The Univ of Penn Orthop 2002; 15:43-51.
  3. Beaty JH, Kasser JR. The Elbow: Physeal Fractures, Apophyseal Injuries of the Distal Humerus, Osteonecrosis of the Trochlea, and T-Condylar Fractures. In: Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. 6th ed. Memphis: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006. p. 592-610.
  4. Wadsworth TG. Premature epiphyseal fusion after injury of capitellum. J Bone Joint Surg 1964; 46:46-49.
  5. Wilson JN. Fracture of external condyle of humerus in children. Br J Surg 1936; 18:299-316.
  6. Morrissy RT, Wilkins KE. Deformity following distal humeral fracture in childhood. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1984; 66:557-562.
  7. Jakob R, Fowles JV, Rang M, et al. Observations concerning fractures of the lateral humeral condyle in children. J Bone Joint Surg 1975; 57B:430-436.
  8. Hardacre JA, Nahigian SH, Froimson AI, et al. Fractures of the lateral condyle of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg 1971; 53:1083-1095.
  9. McDonnell DP, Wilson JC. Fracture of the lower end of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg 1948; 30:347-358.
  10. Foster DE, Sullivan JA, Gross RH. Lateral humeral condylar fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1985; 5:16-22.
  11. Major NM, Crawford ST. Elbow effusions in trauma in adults and children: is there an occult fracture. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178:413-418.
  12. Badelon O, Bensahel H, Mazda K, et al. Lateral humeral condylar fractures in children: a report of 47 cases. J Pediatr Orthop 1988; 8:31-34.
  13. Gooi SG, Chee EK, Wong CL et al. Retrospective review of Kirschner wire fixation and casting for displaced lateral condyle fracture of the humerus in children. J Malaysian Orthop 2008; 2(2):17-20.
  14. Koh KH, Seo SW, Kim KM et al. Clinical and radiographic results of lateral condyle fracture of distal humerus in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2010; 30(5):425–429.
  15. Launay F, Leet AI, Jacopin S et al. lateral humeral condyle fractures in children: A comparison of two approaches to treatment. J Pediatr Orthop 2004; 24(4):385–391.
  16. Milbrandt TA, Copley LAB. Common elbow injuries in children: evaluation, treatment and clinical outcomes. J Curr Opin Orthop 2004; 15:286–294.
  17. Cardona JI, Riddle E, Kumar SJ. Displaced fractures of the lateral humeral condyle: criteria for implant removal. J Pediatr Orthop 2002;22:194-197.
  18. Boz U, Ulusal E, Vuruskaner H, et al. Functional results of displaced lateral condyle fractures of the humerus with four weeks K-wire in children. J Acta Orthop Traumatol turc 2005; 39(3):193-198.19. Conner A, Smith MGH. Displaced fracture of lateral humeral condyle in children. J Bone Joint Surg 1970; 52:460-464.
  19. Blount WP, Schalz I, Cassidy RH. Fractures of the elbow in children. J Am Med Assoc 1951; 146:699-704.
  20. Jeffrey CC. Nonunion of epiphysis of the lateral condyle of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg 1958; 40:396-405.
  21. Morin B, Fassier F, Poitras B, et al. Results of early surgical treatment of fractures of the lateral humeral condyle in children. J Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1988; 74:129-131.
  22. Nielsen FH, Ottsen P. Fractures of the lateral condyle of the humerus in children. J Acta Orthop Scand 1974; 45:518–528.
  23. Sial NA, Shaukat MK, Iqbal MJ. Open reduction and K-wire fixation of displaced unstable lateral condyle fracture of the humerus in children. J Professional Med 2011 jul-sep; 18(3):501-509.
  24. Flynn J. Nonunion of slightly displaced fractures of the lateral humeral condyle in children: an update. J Pediatr Orthop 1989;9: 691–696.
  25. Thomas DP, Howard AW, Cole WG et al. Three weeks of Kirschner wire fixation for displaced lateral condyle fractures of the humerus in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2001; 21(5):565-569.
  26. Hausman MR, Qureshi S, Goldstein R et al. Arthroscopically-assisted treatment of pediatric lateral humeral condyle fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 2007; 27(7):739-742.
  27. Chan LWM, Siow HM: Exposed versus buried wires for fixation of lateral humeral condyle fracture in children: a comparison of safety and efficacy. J Child Orthop 2011; 5:329-333.
  28. Wattenbarger JM, Gerardi DO, Johnston CE. Late open reduction internal fixation of lateral condyle fracture. J Pediatr Orthop2002;22:394–398.