Home About Us Contact Us

 


 

Table of Content - Volume 16 Issue 3 - December 2020

 

A study of association between chest X ray findings and severity of pneumonia in children between 2 to 59 months of age

 

Chethan K B1, Nandakumar V2*, Spoorthi S M3, Basanth Kumar G R4

 

1,3Assistant Professor, 2Junior Resident, 4Professor, Department of Pediatrics, JJM Medical college Davanagere Karnataka, INDIA.

Email: chethankb9@gmail.com

 

Abstract              Background: Pneumonia is one of the major common respiratory problem in present clinical paediatric practice. Chest x ray is presently viewed as a major criterion for identifying the severity of pneumonia. Aim and objective: To study the association between chest x – ray findings and Severity of Pneumonia in children between 2-59months of age presenting with signs and symptoms of pneumonia. Methodology: Present study was a prospective study carried out on Children 2 - 59 months presenting with the symptoms of pneumonia selected as per WHO criteria. Correlation of Severity of pneumonia and x ray finding was studied. Results:n: In present study, out of 332 children admitted with pneumonia 161(48.5%) and severe pneumonia and 171(51%) had pneumonia. chest x-ray abnormalities were seen in 179(53%) cases and in 153(46%) cases. Patients who presented with cyanosis 23(0.69%), grunting 105(31%), hypoxia 106(31.9%) all three had significant radiological association with severe pneumonia (p<0.05).

 

INTRODUCTION

Childhood community acquired pneumonia (CAP) continues to be the single most important cause of childhood morbidity and mortality in the world among under five age group.1 In early 90’s over 25% of annual deaths of children in developing countries before the fifth birthday was attributable to pneumonia. Although the implementation of safe, effective and affordable interventions has reduced pneumonia mortality from 4 million in 19812 to just over one million in 2013, 3,4 pneumonia still accounts for nearly one-fifth of childhood deaths worldwide. Recently the worldwide Global Burden of Disease analysis suggested that CAP accounts for 14% of deaths. In addition to immense public health importance, it has both immediate and late complication. 5 Case management is a cornerstone of pneumonia control strategies. 6 It consists of classifying the severity of illness using simple clinical signs such as fast breathing, chest indrawing and general danger signs, and then applying the appropriate treatment. Treatment includes home care advice, antibiotics for home therapy, or referral to a higher-level health facility The original guidelines classified the respiratory symptoms of children 2 to 59 months of age into four categories (no pneumonia, pneumonia, severe pneumonia, very severe pneumonia).7,8 Data shows that the majority of childhood pneumonia deaths are due to severe pneumonia/severe disease (9); management of these cases requires early identification, prompt referral and the availability of good-quality higher-level care. However, in many low-resource settings, referral is difficult and often does not take place. 10-14 On the basis of this information, WHO undertook a review of the evidence, with the aim of developing a simplified approach that could increase the number of children receiving correct treatment for pneumonia. In addition to the impact of acute disease, respiratory infections (especially when repeated) in young children are associated with long−term lung function abnormality and disease. 15 Early diagnosis and management are critical to short and long−term health outcomes with several clinical guidelines now available for both developing and developed country settings. 16 The implementation and effectiveness of the guidelines vary widely within and between countries and, in many regions, improvements are still required in the diagnosis and management of pneumonia at the community level. 17-20 Many factors contribute to these differences, including: health systems resourcing, the number of possible causative micro−organisms, host and environmental factors, timing of presentation to a health service, expertise of the health service providers at various levels of the health care system, availability of diagnostic facilities and the absence of a true diagnostic gold standard. 15 WHO clinical definition developed for the community setting in developing countries is based on the presence of cough and tachypnoea. 21 This definition was developed particularly with the intention of identifying children who had bacterial pneumonia and required antibiotics. The incidence of pneumonia caused by H. influenzae or S.pneumoniae has been significantly reduced in areas where routine immunization has been implemented. Despite advances in identifying microorganisms using highly sensitive molecular techniques, ascribing causation is problematic, The ideal samples for determining aetiologic agents in bacterial pneumonia are lower airway specimens. It is usually neither necessary nor feasible to obtain either bronchoalveolar lavage or needle lung aspirate specimens in acute pneumonia. 22 Thus, it is not surprising that the chest radiograph (CXR) has long been considered the 'gold standard for the diagnosis of pneumonia in children. Chest X-ray is presently a major criterion for identifying severity of pneumonia. Few studies show correlation between chest x-ray findings and severity 23,24 and few studies show no correlation between chest x-ray findings and severity. 25,26

This study helps us to know the role of chest x-ray in identifying the severity of pneumonia.

Aim and objective: To study the association between chest x – ray findings and Severity of Pneumonia in children between 2-59months of age presenting with signs and symptoms of pneumonia.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Present study was a Prospective study carried out in the department of pediatrics J.J. M. Medical College, Davangere. Study population was All patients between the age of 2 months and 59 months presenting with the symptoms of pneumonia were selected as per modified WHO criteria. 27 Study was conducted during January 2018-june 2019.

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Children 2 - 59 months presenting with the symptoms of pneumonia were selected as per WHO criteria
  2. Parents of children willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Children with Bronchial asthma.
  2. Children with Bronchiolitis.
  3. Children with Congenital heart disease.

Study was approved by ethical committee of the institute. A valid written consent was taken from parents of children after explaining study to them.

After considering inclusion and exclusion criteria, 332 children with symptoms of pneumonia were included. Data was collected with pre tested questionnaire. Data included demographic data like age, sex. Detailed history was taken by interview method from the parents of children. Presenting complaints, immunization status was recorded. Through clinical examination was done. All patients underwent investigations like Chest X – Rays, Complete blood count, and Blood culture. Chest x-rays were interpreted by radiologist. The cases were selected as per the WHO criteria for diagnosis of pneumonia and chest radiographs were interpreted as per the WHO guidelines. All patients were followed for clinical severity of pneumonia and course of illness in the hospital. Correlation was assessed of initial chest x – ray finding and severity of pneumonia as per criteria specified. The following WHO definitions and criteria were used for categorizing patients with pneumonia and interpretations of chest x-ray. Data was entered in the excel spread sheet. SPSS (Statistical Package For Social Sciences) version 20. [IBM SPASS statistics (IBM corp. Armonk, NY, USA released 2011)] was used to perform the statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics of the explanatory and outcome variables was calculated by mean, standard deviation for quantitative variables, frequency and proportions for qualitative variables. Inferential statistics like Chi square test was used to test the significance between qualitative variables. The level of significance was set at 5%.

 

RESULTS

Out of 332 patients, 34.6% were in age group of 25-59 months, 34.3% were between 3-12 months and 31% were between 13-24 months. In the present study, 50.6% were females and 49.4% were males. In our study, out of 332 patients, 171 (51.5%) had severe pneumonia and 161 (48.5%) had pneumonia. In our study, majority patients were fully immunized (93.1%). Among all the children, 90.7% were normal, 3.9% were having moderate acute malnutrition and 5.4% were suffering from severe acute malnutrition. In our study, out of 332 patients, majority presented with one or the other symptoms. 59% presented with fever, 78.6% had cough, 99.4% had tachypnea, 99.4% had chest indrawing, 70.5% had bilateral rhonchi and 67.5% had bilateral crepts. Whereas, 77.7% were not having any breathing difficulty. Only 2.1% presented with convulsion/drowsy, 6.9% had cyanosis, 20.2% were pallor, 31.6% had grunting and 31.9% presented with hypoxia. In the present study, out of 332 cases, 196 (59%) presented with fever and 136 (41%%) did not had fever. Out of 196 cases, 127 (64.8%) cases showed positive radiological findings, of which 123 had severe pneumonia and remaining 4 had pneumonia . Association of fever and x ray finding was statistically significant at p value <0.001. (table 1) In our study, out of 332 cases, 105 (31.6%) cases showed clinical signs of grunting. Among 105 cases with grunting, 100% had severe pneumonia. Among the remaining 227 cases, majority of those with radiological findings had severe pneumonia (70) and majority with normal findings had pneumonia (101). This is statistically significant at p value <0.001. If child presents with Grunting likely to have positive radiological findings was observed with severe pneumonia. (table 2) Out of 332 cases, 106 (31.9%) cases showed clinical signs of hypoxia and 226 (68.1%) did not showed any signs. Out of 106 cases, 100 (94.3%) cases showed positive radiological findings and all of them had severe pneumonia and among other 6(5.7%) cases who showed normal chest x-ray findings 4 had pneumonia and 2 had severe pneumonia. And this is statistically significant at p value <0.001. Among the remaining 226 cases, majority of those with radiological findings had severe pneumonia (41) and majority with normal findings had pneumonia (119). This is statistically significant at p value <0.001. If child presents with hypoxia most likely radiological findings was observed with severe pneumonia. (table 3) In our study, out of 332 cases, 23 (6.9%) cases showed clinical signs cyanosis and 309 (93.1%) did not showed any clinical signs. If child presents with cyanosis or not, positive radiological findings was noted among cases with severe pneumonia and normal chest x-ray was noted among pneumonia cases. (p<0.05) (table 4) In the present study, out of 332 cases, only 7 (2.1%) cases presented with convulsions. Out of these 7 cases, 5 (71.4%) cases showed positive radiological findings, of which all of them had severe pneumonia. Of the remaining 325, 174 (53.5%) showed positive chest x-ray findings and 151 (46.5%) showed normal findings. Majority of those with radiological findings had severe pneumonia (136) and majority with normal findings had pneumonia (121). This is statistically significant at p value <0.001. (table 5)


Graph 1: Distribution of patients based on the severity of Pneumonia

 

Table 1: Association between Pneumonia with fever and chest x-ray findings

Fever

WHO Classification

Radiological

Non radiological

Total

Chi square

p value

Present

Pneumonia

4 (2%)

49 (25%)

53 (27%)

104.373

0.001

Severe pneumonia

123 (62.8%)

20 (10.2%)

143 (73%)

Total

127 (64.8%)

69 (35.2%)

196 (100%)

Absent

Pneumonia

34 (25%)

74 (54.4%)

108 (79.4%)

Severe pneumonia

18 (13.2%)

10 (7.4%)

28 (20.6%)

Total

52 (38.2%)

84 (61.8%)

136 (100%)

 

Table 2: Association between Pneumonia with grunting and chest x-ray findings

Grunting

WHO Classification

Radiological

Non radiological

Total

Chi square

p value

Present

Pneumonia

0

0

0

53.924

0.001

Severe pneumonia

74 (70.5%)

31 (29.5%)

105 (76.2%)

Total

74 (70.5%)

31 (29.5%)

105 (100%)

Absent

Pneumonia

35 (15.4%)

101 (44.5%)

136 (59.9%)

Severe pneumonia

70 (30.8%)

21 (9.3%)

91 (40.1%)

Total

105 (46.3%)

122 (53.7%)

227 (100%)

Table 3: Association between Pneumonia with hypoxia and chest x-ray findings

Hypoxia

WHO Classification

Radiological

Non radiological

Total

Chi square

p value

Present

Pneumonia

0

4 (3.8%)

4 (3.8%)

69.281

0.001

Severe pneumonia

100 (94.3%)

2 (1.9%)

102 (96.2%)

Total

100 (94.3%)

6 (5.7%)

106 (100%)

Absent

Pneumonia

38 (16.8%)

119(52.7%)

157 (69.5%)

Severe pneumonia

41 (18.1%)

28 (12.4%)

69 (30.5%)

Total

79 (35%)

147 (65%)

226 (100%)

 

Table 4: Association between Pneumonia with cyanosis and chest x-ray findings

Cyanosis

WHO Classification

Radiological

Non radiological

Total

Chi square

p value

Present

Pneumonia

0

0

0

13.797

0.001

Severe pneumonia

17 (73.9%)

6 (26.1%)

23 (73.9%)

Total

17 (73.9%)

6 (26.1%)

23 (100%)

Absent

Pneumonia

37 (12%)

118 (38.2%)

155 (50.2%)

Severe pneumonia

125 (40.5%)

29 (9.4%)

154 (49.8%)

Total

162 (52.4%)

147 (47.6%)

309 (100%)

 

Table 4: Association between Pneumonia with convulsions and chest x-ray findings

Convulsions

WHO Classification

Radiological

Non radiological

Total

Chi square

p value

Present

Pneumonia

0

0

0(28.6%)

7.000

0.04

Severe pneumonia

5 (71.4%)

2 (28.6%)

7 (71.4%)

Total

5 (71.4%)

2 (28.6%)

7 (100%)

Absent

Pneumonia

38 (11.7%)

121 (37.2%)

159 (48.9%)

Severe pneumonia

136 (41.8%)

30 (9.2%)

166 (51.1%)

Total

174 (53.5%)

151 (43.5%)

325 (100%)

 


DISCUSSION

In our study total of 332 cases were included 48.5% had pneumonia and 51.5% had severe pneumonia, among them 179 radiological and 153 non radiological cases, no significant association for age(p-0.02),cough(p-0.21) , tachypnea(p-0.212), chest indrawing (p-.21), pallor(p-0.181)with CXR was found . findings on history/examination partial immunization, SAM , fever ,feeding difficulties(p-0.001) had predominantly radiological findings in severe pneumonia cases than pneumonia, clinical presentation like grunting(p-0.001), cyanosis(p-0.04), hypoxia(p-0.001), had significant radiological association, on CXR bilateral infiltrates, primary end point consolidation either lobar or segmental majority cases were of severe pneumonia. A study done by Jain DL et al. at Indra Gandhi government medical college, Nagpur to assess severity of pneumonia aged 3-59 months , total 307 chest xrays, 146 were normal and 148 were abnormal, clinical signs of severity i.e chest indrawing , cyanosis, grunting(p-0.02), convulsions (p-0.03) and hypoxia (p-0.00) were associated with abnormal radiographs. 28 Maria Francesca Patria et al. did similar study in Italy, Seventy-six of the 335 enrolled children (22.7%) fulfilled the criteria for severe CAP. The most frequent radiological presentation was focally distributed parenchymal densities (212, 63.3%). Severe CAP was associated with a bilateral multifocal distribution (OR 2.30; 95% CI, 1.29-4.10). No association was found between CAP severity and the presence of atelectasis, middle right lobe involvement or pleural effusion. 29 Kelly,Matthew S,et al.. did study in that 249 children with evaluable chest radiographs. Median age was 6.1 months, and 58% were male. Chest radiograph classifications were primary endpoint pneumonia (35%), other infiltrate/abnormality (42%) or no significant pathology (22%). 30 Kerry-Ann et al., did study 24 115 hospitalised episodes of care for 9492 children and 13 683 chest radiographs. The average annual cumulative incidence of endpoint consolidation was 26.6 per 1000 population per year (95% CI, 25.3–27.9); 57.5 per 1000 per year in infants aged 1–11 months. 31 Matthew D. Garber et al. concluded A negative CXR result excludes pneumonia in the majority of children. Children with negative CXR results and low clinical suspicion for pneumonia can be safely observed without antibiotic therapy.” Perhaps it is also time to say, “Children with low clinical suspicion for pneumonia can safely be observed without CXRs(65). In our study also non-radiological ( negative CXR was found in 46%), with this we can plan management ,treatment stratergy accordingly. 32 In a prospective study done by Julia E Clark, et al., out of 700 children who presented to the hospital with pneumonia only 20% had lobar x-ray changes. In this study neither CRP, pyrexia or lobar x-ray findings, were associated with severity. 33 Study done by Njeze Ngozi R et al. included a total of 100 chest radiographs of children 16years and below with clinical symptoms of pneumonia and their request forms were reviewed. Thirty seven (37) of the radiographs were in agreement with clinical diagnosis of pneumonia while 63 radiographs had no evidence of infection or inflammation in the lung fields; the authors were of the opinion that Chest radiographs are efficacious in the management of children suspected to have pneumonia but predicting the severity was inconclucive. 34

 

CONCLUSION

Severity of pneumonia like fever, grunting, hypoxia ,feeding difficulty, cyanosis correlate with x-ray findings.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Walker CL, Rudan I, Liu L, Nair H, Theodoratou E, Bhutta ZA et al.. Global burden of childhood pneumonia and diarrhoea. Lancet 2013;381(9875):
  2. Leowski J. Mortality from acute respiratory infections in children under 5 years of age: Global estimates. World Health Statistics Quarterly. 1986; 39:138–44.
  3. Levels and Trends in Child Mortality: Report 2014. United Nations Inter Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. UNICEF, WHO, The World Bank, United Nations Population Division. New York, 2014.
  4. Global Health Observatory. Proportions of child deaths by cause. (http://www.who.int/gho/child_health/en/index.html), WHO, Geneva Accessed on 24 July 2014.
  5. Integrated Global Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Pneumonia and Diarrhoea (GAPPD). Geneva: World Health Organization and The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF);2013 (http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/global_action_plan_pneumonia_diarrhoea/en).
  6. Chart booklet: Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI). Geneva, World Health Organization/The United Nation Children’s Fund (UNICEF), 2008.
  7. Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI). WHO recommendations on the management of diarrhoea and pneumonia in HIV-infected infants and children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010 (http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/9789241548083/en).
  8.  Rudan I et al.. Epidemiology and etiology of childhood pneumonia. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2008; 86:408–416.
  9. Bang AT, Bang RA, Reddy HM. Home-based neonatal care: summary and applications of the field trial in rural Gadchiroli, India (1993 to 2003). Journal of Perinatology. 2005; 25:S108–S122.
  10. The Multi-Country Evaluation of IMCI Effectiveness, Cost and Impact (MCE) – Progress Report’, May 2001–April 2002, Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002 (WHO/FCH/CAG/02.16).
  11. Aguilar AM et al.. Mortality Survey of Bolivia: The Final Report: Investigating and identifying the causes of death for children under five. Published for USAID by the Basic Support for Institutionalizing Child Survival (BASICS) Project, Virginia, 1998.
  12. Schumacher R et al.. Mortality Study in Guinea: Investigating the causes of death in children under 5. Published by Save the Children and the Basic Support for Institutionalizing Child Survival (BASICS II) Project, Virginia, 2002.
  13. Schellenberg JA et al.. Inequalities among the very poor. Health care for children in rural southern Tanzania. Lancet. 2003; 361:561–66.
  14. King PT, Holdsworth SR, Freezer NJ, Villanueva E, Holmes PW. Characterisation of the onset and presenting clinical features of adult bronchiectasis. Respir Med 2006;
  15. Berti E, Galli L, de Martino M, Chiappini E. International guidelines on tackling community−acquired pneumonia show major discrepancies between developed and developing countries. Acta Paediatr Suppl 2001
  16. Bryce J, Victora CG, Habicht JP, Black RE, Scherpbier RW, Advisors MI; MCE−IMCI Technical Advisors. Programmatic pathways to child survival: results of a multi−country evaluation of Integrated Management of Childhood Illness. Health Policy Plan 2005;20 Suppl
  17. Chowdhury EK, El Arifeen S, Rahman M, Hoque DE, Hossain MA, Begum K et al.. Care at first−level facilities for children with severe pneumonia in Bangladesh: a cohort study. Lancet 2008;372
  18. Sarganas G, Scherpbier R, Gericke CA. Constraints, synergies and avenues for scaling up breasVeeding, antibiotics for pneumonia and IMCI interventions in the Cusco region, Peru. Ff000 Res 20f
  19. Senn N, Rarau P, Salib M, Manong D, Siba P, Rogerson S et al.. Use of antibiotics within the IMCI guidelines in outpatient settings in Papua New Guinean children: an observational and effectiveness study. PLoS ONE 20f4;9(3):e90990.
  20. World Health Organization. IMCI Handbook: Integrated Management of Childhood Illness. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2005.
  21. Mulholland EK, Simoes EA, Costales MO, McGrath EJ, Manalac EM, Gove S. Standardized diagnosis of pneumonia in developing countries. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1992;ff(2):77
  22.  Chang AB, Ooi MH, Perera D, Grimwood K. Improving the diagnosis, management, and outcomes of children with pneumonia: Where are the gaps? Front Pediatr 2013;f:29
  23.  Swingler GH. Radiologic differentiation between bacterial and viral lower respiratory infection in children: A systematic literature review, Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2000; 39(11):627-33.
  24. British Thoracic Society of standards of care committee BTS guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in childhood. Thorax 2002; 57: i 1-24.
  25. Gwendolyn S.Kerby, MD,Frank J.Accurso et al.., Respiratory tract and mediastinum. in: William W. Hay, Jr., Myron J. Levin et al.. Current diagnosis and treatment in paediatrics, 18th edition. USA: Appleton and Lange, 2007; 517-518.
  26. Julia E Clark, Donna Hammal, et al.. Children with pneumonia: how do they present and how are they managed arch dis child 2007; 92: 394-398.
  27. WHO/Department of maternal, newborn, child and Adolescent Health; revised classification and treatment of pneumonia in children at health facilities/14.9
  28. Jain DL, et al., Role of chest xray in assessing severity of pneumonia in children aged 3-59months. International Journal of pediatrics,2017;4(03):242-248.
  29. Patria et al..: Association between radiological findings and severity of community-acquired pneumonia in children. Italian Journal of Pediatrics 2013 39:56.
  30. Kelly,Matthew S,et al.. chest radiographic findings and outcome of pneumonia among children in Botswana.The Pediatric infectious disease journal 35.3(2016): 257.
  31. Kerry-Ann F O’Grady,et al.. Rates of radiologically confirmed pneumonia as defined by the world Health organization in Northern territory Indigenous children. Medical journal of Australia 192.10(2010);592-595.
  32. Garber MD and Quinonez RA. Chest Radiograph for Childhood Pneumonia: Good,but Not Good Enough. Pediatrics. 2018;142(3): e20182025 PEDIATRICS Volume 142, number 3, September 2018:e20182025.O
  33. Julia E Clark, Donna Hammal, et al.. Children with pneumonia: how do they present and how are they managed arch dis child 2007; 92: 394-398.
  34. Njeze Ngozi R,Okwor Chidinma, and Nzegwu Martin. A Correlation Between Clinical and Chest Radiographic Diagnosis of Pneumonia in Nigerian Children. ADVANCES IN BIORESEARCH Volume 2, Issue 2, December 2011: 18 – 21.

 








 





Policy for Articles with Open Access:

Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Pediatrics (Print ISSN: 2579-0897) (Online ISSN: 2636-4662) agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.