Home About Us Contact Us

 

Table of Content - Volume 20 Issue 2 - November 2021


 

Study of Saccharomyces boularii in acute watery diarrhea in children between 2 months to 5 years of age at a tertiary hospital

 

Santosh Kulkarni1, Manjushree Kulkarni2*

 

1Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, BKL Walalwalkar Trust Rural, Medical Collage, Sawarde, Ratnagiri, INDIA.

2Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Prakash Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Urunislampur, INDIA.

Email: drsantoshkulkarni@gmail.com

 

Abstract              Background: Diarrhea with any cause and any period of time may lead to dehydration and even may be lethal in infants, children, and the elderly if not corrected immediately. Probiotics secrete antimicrobial products, intestinal mucin, and bacteriocins which inhibit pathogens and help to produce immunomodulation at the gut level to decrease duration of diarrheal symptoms. In present study we compared role of Saccharomyces boularii in acute watery diarrhea in children between 2 months to 5 years of age at tertiary hospital. Material and Methods: Present study was single-center, prospective, comparative, interventional study, conducted in children Hospitalized due to diarrhea, aged from 2 month to 5 years of age, clinical suspicion of rotavirus infection, with mild to moderate dehydration and no prior probiotic administration. 80 children were randomly divided into 2 groups. children received oral rehydration therapy, Zinc and Saccharomyces boulardii (Group 1) versus children received ORT+ Zinc (Group 2). Results: During study period, 80 children were equally divided into 2 groups. General characteristics such as age, gender, average weight, dehydration status were comparable in both groups and difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Total duration of diarrhea in group I was 58.96 ± 11.53 Hours as compared to 92.8 ± 13.07 Hours in group 2, difference was statistically significant (p- 0.032). Mean number of stools per day was 4.12 ± 3.64/day in group I and 6.05 ± 3.20/day in group II, difference was statistically significant (p-0.007). Mean duration of Fever after the Treatment in group I was 45.96 ± 1.53 Hours as compared to 45.84 ± 0.81 Hours in group 2, difference was statistically not significant (p-0.062). While Mean duration of Vomiting after the Treatment in group I was, 52.8 ± 1.07 hours while 69.6 ± 0.69 hours in group II, difference was statistically significant (p- 0.046) Conclusion: Saccharomyces boulardii is effective in reducing the duration of diarrhea and hospital stay in children with acute gastroenteritis.

Keywords: Saccharomyces boulardii, diarrhea, acute gastroenteritis, frequency of stools,

 

INTRODUCTION

Diarrhea with any cause and any period of time may lead to dehydration and even may be lethal in infants, children, and the elderly if not corrected immediately.1 Rotaviral gastroenteritis is associated with a substantial clinical and economic burden in both developed and developing countries. Vaccination is the primary public health intervention for prevention of rotavirus infection.2 The mainstay of treatment of an acute rotavirus diarrhea episode includes oral rehydration therapy (ORT) and zinc. ORT aims to prevent or reverse dehydration, and has no effect either on the duration of diarrhea or on the stool output. Zinc is not universally effective in the treatment of acute diarrhea, and has been used mainly in developing country settings.3 Bacterio-therapy is known to play an important role in intestinal dysbiosis and judicious use of probiotics could reduce the duration and frequency of diarrhoea. Probiotics secrete antimicrobial products, intestinal mucin, and bacteriocins which inhibit pathogens and help to produce immunomodulation at the gut level to decrease duration of diarrheal symptoms. Saccharomyces boulardii (SB) is a nonpathogenic yeast that have demonstrated an antiinflammatory, anti-microbial, enzymatic, metabolic and anti-toxin activity including trophic effect by enhancing the metabolic function of the gut mucosa. In present study we compared role of Saccharomyces boularii in acute watery diarrhea in children between 2 months to 5 years of age at tertiary hospital.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Present study was single-center, prospective, comparative, interventional study, conducted in Department of Pediatrics, BKL Walalwalkar Trust Rural, Medical Collage, Sawarde, India. Study duration was of 1 year (January 2020 to December 2020). Study was approved by institutional ethical committee.

Inclusion criteria: Children Hospitalized due to diarrhea, aged from 2 month to 5 years of age, clinical suspicion of rotavirus infection, with mild to moderate dehydration and no prior probiotic administration. Parents willing to participate in study.

Exclusion criteria: Children with Chronic diarrhea (more than two weeks), infections caused by other bacteria, patients treated with antimotility agents for diarrhea, patient who were taken antibiotic/probiotic 7 days prior to hospital admission, ICU admitted patients.

80 children were randomly divided into 2 groups:

Group 1 - children received oral rehydration therapy (ORT) +Zinc + Saccharomyces boulardii (500 mg/day, contains 2.5 million colony forming units -CFU). It was diluted in 20 ml of water according to the manufacturers’ instructions, and given in two divided doses particularly morning and evening, and minimum duration of administration was 5 days.

Group 2 - children received ORT+ Zinc (Group 2).

All the patients received the same diet; those below 6 months of age maintained breast feeding.

On admission, study patient demographic data, type of treatment given, and daily note on frequency of stools, consistency of stools, vomiting, fever and also blood count values were noted and patients were regularly followed up to the hospital discharge. All the information was provided by the mother or attendant every morning starting from day 1 to date of discharge.

The primary outcome measures were the total duration of diarrhea (Duration from the first to the last abnormal loose/liquid stools preceding a normal stool output) and the number of stools per day and their consistency. Secondary outcome measures were the incidence and mean duration of vomiting, fever. Data was collected and compiled using Microsoft Excel, analysed using SPSS 23.0 version. Frequency, percentage, means and standard deviations (SD) was calculated for the continuous variables, while ratios and proportions were calculated for the categorical variables. Difference of proportions between qualitative variables were tested using chi- square test or Fisher exact test as applicable. P value less than 0.5 was considered as statistically significant.

 

RESULTS

During study period, 80 children were equally divided into 2 groups. Majority of children were from 6-12 months age group followed by 1-2 years age group. General characteristics such as age, gender, average weight, dehydration status were comparable in both groups and difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05).


 

Table 1: Demographic Characteristics of the Subjects

Characteristics

Group I

Group II

p-value

Age

0.62

2–6 months

5 (12.5 %)

3 (7.5 %)

 

6–12 months

18 (45 %)

19 (47.5 %)

 

1–2 years

11 (27.5 %)

12 (30 %)

 

2–3 years

3 (7.5 %)

4 (10 %)

 

3–5 years

3 (7.5 %)

2 (5 %)

 

Gender

0.71

Male

23 (57.5 %)

22 (55 %)

 

Female

17 (42.5 %)

18 (55 %)

 

Average weight

9.1 ± 3.6 kg

9.6 ± 4.2 kg

0.80

Dehydration status

0.82

Mild

24 (60 %)

26 (65 %)

 

Moderate

16 (40 %)

14 (35 %)

 

Total duration of diarrhea in group I was 58.96 ± 11.53 Hours as compared to 92.8 ± 13.07 Hours in group 2, difference was statistically significant (p- 0.032). Mean number of stools per day was 4.12 ± 3.64/day in group I and 6.05 ± 3.20/day in group II, difference was statistically significant (p-0.007). Mean duration of Fever after the Treatment in group I was 45.96 ± 1.53 Hours as compared to 45.84 ± 0.81 Hours in group 2, difference was statistically not significant (p-0.062). While Mean duration of Vomiting after the Treatment in group I was, 52.8 ± 1.07 hours while 69.6 ± 0.69 hours in group II, difference was statistically significant (p- 0.046).

Table 2: Study outcome

Outcome

Group I

Group II

*p-value

total duration of diarrhea (Hours)

58.96 ± 11.53

92.8 ± 13.07

0.032

number of stools per day

 

 

 

Day 1

11.2 ± 3.89

11.1 ± 4.10

 

Day 2

6.1 ± 3.14

7.5 ± 2.18

 

Day 3

2.9 ± 2.25

5.2 ± 2.64

 

Day 4

0.5 ± 1.46

2.3 ± 1.02

 

Day 5

0.5 ± 1.02

1.8 ± 0.9

 

Mean

4.12 ± 3.64

6.05 ± 3.20

0.007

Duration after Treatment (Hours)

 

 

 

Fever

45.96 ± 1.53

45.84 ± 0.81

0.062

Vomiting

52.8 ± 1.07

69.6 ± 0.69

0.046

 


DISCUSSION

The aetiology of acute diarrhoea in children includes infections of the gastrointestinal tract (i.e. bacteria, viruses, protozoa), intoxications, systemic infections, malabsorption disorders, nutritional deficiency and allergy or intolerance to food or drugs (i.e. antibiotics, laxatives).5 Probiotics (multiple single strains) with potentially multiple mechanisms of action were found to reduce the associated risk of acute GE (AGE) in children, with the effect dependent on the age of the host and the genera of the strain used.6 The mechanisms of action of S. boulardii, depend mainly on the inhibition of some bacterial toxins, anti-inflammatory effects, and on stimulating effects on the intestinal mucosa such as trophic effects on the brush border enzymes and immunostimulatory effects. 7 Importantly, S. boulardii might interfere with cellular signalling pathways common in many inflammatory conditions and show antimicrobial activity, prevent apoptosis and Tumour Necrotic Factor (TNF) Synthesis, increase immunity.8 Das S et al.,9 studied 60 Children with WHO-defined acute watery diarrhea and stool rotavirus positive and were randomized into intervention (n-30) and control (n- 30) groups. The intervention group received SB (500 mg/day) for 5 days. The median duration (hours) of diarrhea was significantly shorter in the intervention group. A significantly shorter duration of hospitalization was also seen in the intervention group, but no significant difference was seen for fever and vomiting. There was also no difference between the two groups in the proportion of children requiring parenteral rehydration and persistence of diarrhea lasting beyond day 7. Similar findings were noted in present study. Feizizadeh S et al.,10 studied 22 articles, and noted that S. boulardii significantly reduced the duration of diarrhea (mean difference [MD], 219.7 hours; 95% confidence interval [CI], 226.05 to 213.34), stool frequency on day 2 (MD, 20.74; 95% CI, 21.38 to 20.10) and day 3 (MD, 21.24; 95% CI, 22.13 to 20.35), the risk for diarrhea on day 3 (risk ratio [RR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.60) and day 4 (RR, 0.38; 95% CI,0.24 to 0.59) after intervention compared with control. This review and meta-analysis show that S. boulardii was safe and has clear beneficial effects in children who have acute diarrhea. Dash DK et al.,11 conducted a comparative study between children on oral rehydration therapy (ORT) +Zinc + Saccharomyces boulardii(Probiotic 5 billion CFU twicedaily) ((Group 1)) and children on ORT+ Zinc (Group 2). The duration of diarrhoea in Group 1 was 26.31 hours and Group 2 was 47.81 hours (p<0.01). The frequency of diarrhoea showed improvement within 24 and 72 hours in Group 1 and Group 2 respectively (p<0.01). Similarly, the mean duration of hospital stay was 2.68 days in Group 1 and 4.8 days in Group 2.The treatment cost was INR 850 and INR 1650 while social cost was INR 1250 and 2600 in Group 1 and 2 respectively. They noted that S. boulardii reduced the duration, frequency and hospital stay of diarrhoea thereby reducing the treatment and social costs. Morgambal P. et al.,12 conducted a systematic review and noted that Saccharomyces boulardii showed a potential benefit in treating acute GE in the paediatric patient. A dose of 250 mg 1–2 times per day for up to 5 days showed some benefit and appears safe. Larger, rigorous RCTs are needed to investigate the efficacy and safety of Saccharomyces boulardii in order to offer specific treatment guidelines. S. boulardii can be administered simultaneously to prevent antibiotic-associated diarrhea owing to its resistance to most antibiotics. However, a recent randomized controlled trial reported S. boulardii was not effective in preventing the development of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in elderly hospitalized patients.13 Certain probiotics have demonstrated efficacy and are widely used for preventing and treating medical conditions involving the gastrointestinal tract in children. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG), L. reuteri and Saccharomyces boulardii are the best studied probiotics and have been shown to be most effective as treatment if introduced early in the course of the disease.

 

 

 

CONCLUSION

Saccharomyces boulardii is effective in reducing the duration of diarrhea and hospital stay in children with acute gastroenteritis. We noted reduced duration of diarrhoea, less mean frequency of stools, improved consistency of stools in the Saccharomyces boulardii group. Children treated with Saccharomyces boulardii had a significantly shorter duration of hospital stay as compared to the children from other group.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Nataro JP. Diarrhea among children in developing countries. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;764:73–80
  2. Bernstein DI. The changing epidemiology of rotavirus gastroenteritis. J Pediatr Infect Dis. 2009;28(3):49.
  3. Das RR. Zinc in acute childhood diarrhea: is it universally effective? Indian J Pharmacol 2012;44:140.
  4. Kelesidis T, Pothoulakis C. Efficacy and safety of the probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii for the prevention and therapy of gastrointestinal disorders. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2012;5:111–25.
  5. Guandalini S: Acute diarrhea. In: Pediatric Gastrointestinal Disease (Walker WA, Durie PR, Hamilton JR, eds), 3rd edn. Hamilton: BC Decker Inc, 2000; pp28 – 38.
  6. Sazawal S, Hiremath G, Dhingra U, et al. Efficacy of probiotics in prevention of acute diarrhea: a meta-analysis of masked, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6(6):374–82.
  7. Vandenplas Y, Brunser O, Szajewska H. Saccharomyces boulardii in childhood. Eur J Pediatr. 2009 Mar;168(3):253-65.
  8. Kelesidis T. Efficacy and safety of the probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii for the prevention and therapy of gastrointestinal disorders. Therap Adv in Gastroenterol. 2012;5(2):111–25.
  9. Das S, Gupta PK, Das RR. Efficacy and Safety of Saccharomyces boulardii in Acute Rotavirus Diarrhea: Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial from a Developing Country. J Trop Pediatr. 2016 Dec;62(6):464-470.
  10. Feizizadeh S, Salehi-Abargouei A, Akbari V. Efficacy and safety of Saccharomyces boulardii for acute diarrhea. Pediatrics. 2014 Jul;134(1):e176-91.
  11. Dash DK, Dash M, Mohanty MD, Acharya N. Efficacy of Probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii as an Adjuvant Therapy in Acute Childhood Diarrhoea. J Nepal Paediatr Soc 2016;36(3):250-255.
  12. Morgambal Padayachee, Janicke Visser, Estelle Viljoen, Alfred Musekiwa, Efficacy and safety of Saccharomyces boulardii in the treatment of acute gastroenteritis in paediatric population: a systematic review, South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2019, 32:3, 58-69,
  13. Pozzoni P, Riva A, Bellatorre AG, et al. Saccharomyces boulardii for the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in adult hospitalized patients: a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(6):922–931.
  14. Cruchet S, Furnes R, Maruy A, Hebel E, Palacios J, Medina F, Ramirez N, Orsi M, Rondon L, Sdepanian V, Xóchihua L, Ybarra M, Zablah RA. The use of probiotics in pediatric gastroenterology: a review of the literature and recommendations by Latin-American experts. Paediatr Drugs. 2015 Jun;17(3):199-216.



 











































 








 




 








 

 









Policy for Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology (Print ISSN:2579-0900) (Online ISSN: 2636-4654) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.