Home About Us Contact Us

 

Table of Content - Volume 17 Issue 3 - March 2021


 

Study of progress of labor with intrathecal labor analgesia using fentanyl 25μg alone versus fentanyl 20μg plus bupivacaine 2.5mg

 

Ambika1, Lalit Mohan Negi2, Priyanshu Sharma3*, Jassa Ram4, Kamlesh Chaudhary5

 

1Department of Health and Family Welfare HP Government, Operation Theatre Incharge Deen Dyal Upadhyay Zonal Hospital Shimla, District Shimla Himachal Pradesh, INDIA.

2Senior Resident Department of OBG, IGMC, Shimla, INDIA.

3Department of Health and Family Welfare Hp Government, Operation Theatre Incharge Civil Hospital Theog, District Shimla Himachal Pradesh, INDIA.

4senior Resident Department of Anaesthesia Slbsmc Nerchok District Mandi HP, INDIA.

Email: priyanshusharma27@gmail.com

 

Abstract              Background: Labour analgesia techniques, are widely practised procedures performed by an anaesthesiologist on request by the obstetrician or parturient. Single shot spinal analgesia is an alternative to epidural analgesia during labour, easier to administer and with faster onset of pain relief. In present study we compared intrathecal labor analgesia using fentanyl 25μg alone and fentanyl 20μg plus bupivacaine 2.5mg on the progress of labor at a tertiary hospital. Material and Methods: Present study was conducted in 20-30 years age, primigravida, full-term, singleton pregnancies, vertex presentation, in active phase of labor with a cervical dilatation of more than 4 cm with normal fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings, ASA grade I/II, parturients were randomly allocated in 2 groups. Results: In present study total 60 parturients were equally divided in two groups (Group F and Group BF). General characteristics of participants such as maternal age, height, weight, cervical dilatation at entry in study and Baseline VAS score were comparable in both groups. In BF group early onset of labor analgesia, more duration of labor analgesia, better rate of cervical dilatation, APFAR scores and less duration of second stage was noted as compared to group F, difference was not significant. While short duration of active first stage was noted in group F than group BF, difference was not significant. No side effects/ adverse effects were noted in present study. Conclusion: Intrathecal fentanyl with bupivacaine group had early onset of labor analgesia, more duration of labor analgesia, better rate of cervical dilatation, APFAR scores and less duration of second stage. Though no significant difference was noted for duration of active phase of first stage, duration of second stage and progress of labour in both groups.

Keywords: progress of labour, intrathecal labor analgesia, fentanyl, bupivacaine

 

INTRODUCTION

Pain relief is an important issue for labouring women. The level of pain experienced and the effectiveness of pain relief may influence a woman's satisfaction with labour and the birth and may have immediate and long-term emotional and psychological effects.1 Labour analgesia techniques, are widely practised procedures performed by an anaesthesiologist on request by the obstetrician or parturients. During vaginal birth, neuroaxial analgesia is proven to give the most effective pain relief. Single shot spinal analgesia is an alternative to epidural analgesia during labour, easier to administer and with faster onset of pain relief but with a restricted duration as limitation.2 Systemic opioids are shown to have limited effect on pain during labour but in neuraxial route opioids are proven effective. Opioids are widely used in conjunction with local anesthetics as they permit the use of a lower dose of local anesthetics while providing adequate anesthesia and analgesia. It both provides adequate anesthesia as well as lower drug toxicity.3 Spinal anaesthesia with local anaesthetic agents, especially bupivacaine, has side effects such as hypotension, respiratory depression, vomiting and shivering in a dose dependent fashion.4 In present study we compared intrathecal labor analgesia using fentanyl 25μg alone and fentanyl 20μg plus bupivacaine 2.5mg on the progress of labor at a tertiary hospital.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Present study was conducted in department of anaesthesiology with help from obstetrics and gynaecology department during February 2020 to September 2020. Study design was interventional, comparative study. Institutional ethical committee approval was taken. 20-30 years, primigravida, full-term, singleton pregnancies, vertex presentation , in active phase of labor with a cervical dilatation of more than 4 cm with normal fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings, ASA (American society of Anaesthesiologists) status grade I and II were considered for this study. Parturients delivered vaginally were included and women required LSCS were excluded.

60 parturients were enrolled in present study, randomly allocated in 2 groups.

  1. Group F - received an intrathecal injection of fentanyl 25 μg
  2. Group BF - received intrathecal injection of fentanyl 20 μg plus 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 2.5 mg (0.5 ml)

After preloading with 500 ml RL solution, under all aseptic precautions spinal block was given in left lateral position, in L3-L4 interspace with a 25 G spinal needle. Single intrathecal injection was given as per group distribution. Maternal parameters such as maternal vitals, duration of sensory block, pain scores were recorded by anaesthetist. Labour was monitored partographically by obstetrician. Partograph helps to record frequency and intensity of uterine contractions, dilation of the cervix, descent of the presenting part, oxytocin used and fetal heart rate recordings. Every neonate was examined by neonatologist immediately after birth and APGAR scores were recorded. All findings were recorded in Microsoft excel sheet and analysed with help of SPSS version 22. Unpaired and paired student t-test was used to analyze the data, p value less than 0.05 was considered as significant.

 

RESULTS

In present study total 60 parturients were equally divided in two groups (Group F and Group BF). General characteristics of participants such as maternal age, height, weight, cervical dilatation at entry in study and Baseline VAS score were comparable in both groups.


 

Table 1: General characteristics

Characteristics

Group F (n=30)

Group BF (n=30)

Age (in years)

23.11 ± 2.34

22.92 ± 2.87

Height (in cms)

155.1 ± 5.21

154.2 ± 6.25

Weight (in kgs)

64.17 ± 7.21

66.24 ± 6.72

Cervical Dilatation at entry in study (in cms)

4.56 ± 0.38

4.42 ± 0.29

Baseline VAS score

5.32 ± 1.17

5.57 ± 1.06

In BF group early onset of labor analgesia, more duration of labor analgesia, better rate of cervical dilatation, APFAR scores and less duration of second stage was noted as compared to group F, difference was not significant. While short duration of active first stage was noted in group F than group BF, difference was not significant. No side effects/ adverse effects were noted in present study.

 

Table 2: Labor characteristics

Characteristics

Group F (n=30)

Group BF (n=30)

P value

Onset time of Labor Analgesia (min)

4.32 ± 1.42

2.92 ± 1.07

0.52

Duration of Labor Analgesia (min)

214.46 ± 34.75

203.25 ± 26.12

0.60

Duration of active 1st stage (in min)

177.35 ± 21.24

179.97 ± 18.49

0.75

Duration Of 2nd Stage in min

34.6 ± 13.16

32.07 ± 11.15

0.53

Rate of cervical dilatation (cm/h)

1.59 ± 0.45

1.71 ± 0.32

0.84

Oxytocin used (units)

5.56 ± 2.14

5.91 ± 1.94

0.85

APGAR score 1 min after birth

6.97 ± 0.57

7.12 ± 0.72

0.61

APGAR score 5 min after birth

8.57 ± 0.77

8.68 ± 0.65

0.73

 


DISCUSSION

Painful uterine contractions cause maternal hyperventilation and increased catecholamine concentration resulting in maternal and fetal hypoxaemia.5 An ideal labour analgesic technique should provide adequate and satisfactory analgesia without any motor blockade or adverse maternal and fetal effects. Among the variety of labour analgesia techniques ranging from parenteral and inhalational agents, regional analgesia has an edge over other methods in achieving the above goals.2 Fentanyl has been studied extensively and is added during induction of anesthesia to provide analgesia during surgical procedures and to decrease the hypertensive response to intubation.6 Often, intrathecal opioids, such as fentanyl or sufentanil, are combined with local anesthetics, thereby markedly enhancing the quality and duration of postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery as well as providing better parturient comfort without affecting neonatal outcome significantly.7 Bupivacaine is the most commonly used drug for subarachnoid block due to its lesser side effects. Various studies have shown that lowdose diluted bupivacaine with fentanyl can provide sufficient anesthesia with rapid recovery in patients undergoing ambulatory surgery or minor urological surgeries.8 In study by Gowrisree K, 9 duration of the active phase of first stage of labor was slightly shortened in group A (intrathecal labor analgesia with fentanyl 25 μg) as compared to group B (fentanyl 20 μg plus bupivacaine 2.5 mg). Duration of the second stage of labor was slightly prolonged in group-B as compared to group A (22.2 vs 25.07min,) and significant. Rate of cervical dilation was faster in group A as compared to group B (1.93 vs. 1.94 cm/h). They concluded that, rapid onset with satisfactory pain relief, VAS scores <4 and good maternal and fetal hemodynamics in both the groups and minimal motor block in group-B. Similar findings were noted in present study. Mathur P et al.,10 noted that, mean duration of second stage of labor was significantly prolonged in labour analgesia group (18.03 ± 8.27 min) as compared to control group (10.13 ± 5.89 min) and difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Possible reason for a prolonged second stage could be relaxation of the abdominal wall musculature secondary to neuraxial local anesthetic resulting in decreased effectiveness of maternal expulsive efforts. Mathur P et al. concluded that single shot intrathecal analgesia using fentanyl 25 μg and bupivacaine 2.5 mg when given in the active phase of first stage of labor had rapid onset with satisfactory pain relief and minimal motor block, associated with faster cervical dilation rate and no delay in the progress of labor, without significant maternal and fetal hemodynamic variation. Fentanyl has been used along with bupivacaine for labor analgesia extensively to decrease motor block, however the addition of opioids to local anesthetics has disadvantages of pruritus and respiratory depression.11 No side effects/ adverse effects were noted in present study. Traditional epidural techniques, employing high concentrations of local anaesthetic (at least 0.25% bupivacaine), have been associated with prolonged labour, use of oxytocin augmentation and an increased incidence of instrumental vaginal delivery.2 Higher doses of bupivacaine, increasing the level of blockade are likely to enhance hypotension and induce breathing difficulties but reducing the dose of bupivacaine does not prevent hypotension.12 Also coadministration of small doses of intrathecal opioids with bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia is advisable and advantageous in order to decrease the intensity as well as severity of spinal complications associated with spinal anaesthesia.13 Combined Spinal Epidural technique provides effective and timely labour analgesia particularly for women in active labour. CSE technique consists of a spinal injection of a small dose of local anaesthetics and/or lipophilic opioids (usually Fentanyl or Sufentanil), followed by introduction of catheter into epidural space for maintaining of analgesia by extradural drug administration.14

 

CONCLUSION

Intrathecal fentanyl with bupivacaine group had early onset of labor analgesia, more duration of labor analgesia, better rate of cervical dilatation, APFAR scores and less duration of second stage. Though no significant difference was noted for duration of active phase of first stage, duration of second stage and progress of labour in both groups.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Christiansen P, Klostergaard KM, Terp MR, Poulsen C, Agger AO, Rasmussen KL. Long-memory of labour pain. Ugeskrift for Laeger 2002;164(42):4927-9.
  2. Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Jones L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011(12):CD000331.
  3. BenDavid B, Solomon E, Levin H, Admoni H, Intrathecal fentanyl with smalldose dilute bupivacaine: Better anesthesia without prolonging recovery. Anesth Analg 1997;85:5605.
  4. Jaishri B, Nap S (2005) Synergistic effect of intrathecal fentanyl and bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. BMC Anesthesiology 5(1): 5.
  5. Wong CA. Advances in labor analgesia. Int J Womens Health 2009;1:139-54.
  6. Gupta R, Kaur S, Singh S, Aujla KS. A comparison of epidural butorphanol and tramadol for postoperative analgesia using CSEA technique. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2011;27:358.
  7. Urbanek B, Kapral S. Levobupivacaine for regional anesthesia. A systematic review. Anaesthesist 2006;55:296313.
  8. Goel S, Bhardwaj N, Grover VK. Intrathecal fentanyl added to intrathecal bupivacaine for day case surgery: A randomized study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003;20:2947.
  9. Gowrisree Kadimi, Gopal Reddy Narra, Effect of intrathecal labor analgesia using fentanyl 25μg alone and fentanyl 20μg plus bupivacaine 2.5mg on the progress of labor. MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology. May 2019; 10(2): 107-111.
  10. Mathur P, Jain N, Prajapat L, Jain K, Garg D, Khandelwal V. Effect of intrathecal labor analgesia using fentanyl 25 μg and bupivacaine 2.5 mg on progress of labor. J Obstet Anaesth Crit Care 2017;7:47-51.
  11. Gupta R, Verma R, Bogra J, Kohli M, Raman R, Kushwaha JK. A Comparative study of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to Bupivacaine. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2011;27:339-43.
  12. Turhanoglu S, Kaya S, Erdogan H (2009) Is there an advantage in using low-dose intrathecal bupivacaine for cesarean section. J Anesth 23(3): 353-357.
  13. Rauch E, Intrathecal Hydromorphone for Postoperative Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery, A Retrospective Study. AANA Journal 2012, 80(4): S25-S32.
  14. C. Loubert, A. Hinova, R. Fernando. Update on modern neuraxial analgesia in labour: a review of the literature of the last 5 years. Anaesthesia 2011;66:191–212.









 








 




 








 

 









Policy for Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology (Print ISSN:2579-0900) (Online ISSN: 2636-4654) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.