Home About Us Contact Us

 


 

Table of Content - Volume 18 Issue 1 - April 2021


Study of efficacy of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl for suppression of pressor response to pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgeries

 

Vootkur Ram Reddy1, Irukulla Avanthi2

 

1Senior Resident, 2Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, Sreepuram, Narketpally, Nalgonda district,508254. Telangana State, INDIA.

Email: vootkur.ram@gmail.com

 

Abstract              Background: Peritoneal insufflation in laparoscopic surgeries induces alterations of hemodynamics, characterized by decrease in stroke volume and cardiac output, elevation of mean arterial pressure, and increase of systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance. Present study was aimed to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine Versus fentanyl on hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation, following pneumoperitoneum and intraoperative period in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Material and Methods: The present prospective, randomized comparative study in patients 18-60 years age, posted for planned laparoscopic surgery, ASA grade I/II, willing to participate in study were considered for present study. Patients were allocated randomly to the two groups using slips in box method. Immediately before induction, patients in the fentanyl group (Group F) received fentanyl 1µg/kg in normal saline and in the dexmedetomidine group (Group D) received dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg in normal saline. Results: Age, gender, weight and ASA grading were comparable in the two groups. Distribution of systolic blood pressure (SBP) at various intervals between the two groups and p value is statistically significant at time of intubation, 15 min after pneumoperitoneum and at the time of extubation. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at various intervals between the two groups and p value is statistically significant at time of intubation, 15 min after pneumoperitoneum and at the time of extubation. Heart rate at various intervals between the two groups and p value is statistically significant at time of intubation, 15 min,30 min after pneumoperitoneum and at the time of extubation Conclusion: Intravenous premedication with infusion of dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg over 10min as loading dose followed by 0.2mcg/kg/hr as maintenance is recommended for better haemodynamic stability during perioperative period despite high cost.

Keywords: dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, pressor response, laparoscopic surgeries.

 

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic surgeries involve insufflation of a CO2 gas into the peritoneal cavity producing a pneumoperitoneum. Peritoneal insufflation induces alterations of hemodynamics, characterized by decrease in stroke volume and cardiac output, elevation of mean arterial pressure, and increase of systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance.1 Hemodynamic changes are accentuated in high-risk cardiac patients Dexmedetomidine has analgesic, anxiolytic, sedative and sympatholytic properties. Dexmedetomidine also attenuates the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation, decreases plasma catecholamine concentration during anaesthesia and decreases perioperative requirement of inhaled anesthetics.2 The hypnotic response is probably mediated by activation of the α2 adrenoreceptors. Dexmedetomidine is proved to have antinociceptive effects and reduce the neurohumoral properties.3 Fentanyl citrate is a narcotic analgesic interacting predominantly with the opioid μ receptor and exerting its principal pharmacological effect on CNS. Its primary action of therapeutic value is analgesia and sedation. It is extensively used for anesthetic and analgesic most often in operating room and ICU.4 The study was aimed to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine Versus fentanyl on hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation, following pneumoperitoneum and intraoperative period in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The present prospective, randomized comparative study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology, Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, Narketpally for a period of 1 year. Institutional ethical committee approval was taken.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients 18-60 years age, posted for planned laparoscopic surgery, ASA grade I/II, willing to participate in study were considered for present study.

Exclusion criteria

  • ASA grade III or greater
  • Base line heart rate less than 60bpm, base line blood pressure less than 100/60mmHg
  • Patients with history of hypertension, ischemic heart disease, heart block, left ventricular failure, heart block, severe renal or hepatic disease.
  • Pregnant, lactating and menstruating females.
  • Anticipated difficult intubation

A pre anesthetic evaluation comprising of history of previous medical and surgical illness, previous anesthetic exposures, drug allergies and baseline investigations of blood, radiographs of chest and airway examination was done. All patients were explained about the procedure and its complications and informed consent obtained. Preoperative vital parameters in the form of baseline pulse, blood pressure and oxygen saturation was recorded. Patients were allocated randomly to the two groups using slips in box method. All patients were pre-medicated with intravenous Glycopyrrolate 4µg/kg, Ondansetron 15µg/kg. Immediately before induction, patients in the fentanyl group (Group F) received fentanyl 1µg/kg in normal saline and in the dexmedetomidine group (Group D) received dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg in normal saline. Total volume of the study drug was adjusted to 50 ml and administered over a period of 10 min before induction. Followed by infusion dose of respective drugs at the rate of 0.2µg/kg/hr after the loading dose All patients were preoxygenated with 100% O2 for 3 minutes and were induced with Propofol 2mg/kg IV. Intubation was facilitated by using Vecuronium bromide 0.1mg/kg. The lungs were ventilated with 100% oxygen for 3 minutes. Intra-abdominal pressure was restricted to 10-14mmHg throughout the laparoscopic procedure. The patients were mechanically ventilated to keep ETCO2 between 35-40 mm hg. Anaesthesia was maintained with Vecuronium bromide and intermittent positive pressure ventilation with nitrous oxide and oxygen in the ratio of 50: 50 with 1% Isoflurane using circle absorber system connected to the Boyle’s anesthetic workstation. Intra-abdominal pressure was restricted to 10-14 mmHg. EtCO2 was maintained below 35 mmHg at any course of the procedure. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, SPO2, EtCO2 were recorded at various intervals as pre-operatively i.e. before premedication (baseline value), after induction, after intubation, 15 min, 30 min, 45min, 60 min,75 min,90min, extubation and post operatively. At the end of surgery, neuromuscular blockade was reversed with neostigmine 50 μg/ kg and glycopyrrolate10 μg/kg intravenously. After satisfying the extubation criteria, patient was extubated and transferred to post-operative ward. Patients were observed for any adverse events during postoperative period. The data was expressed as mean and standard deviation. Comparison between two groups at a time (inter-group comparison) was done using student’s unpaired t- test. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant, value < 0.01 was considered highly significant.

 

RESULTS

Total of 60 patients randomly allocated in two groups, to Group D (Dexmedetomidine) and Group F (Fentanyl) of 30 each undergoing elective laparoscopic surgeries, under GA were studied. Age, gender, weight and ASA grading were comparable in the two groups.

Table 1: General parameters

Parameters

Group D (n=30)

Group F (n=30)

P value

Age [years]

30.7 ± 7.611

29.23 ± 7.205

0.445

Weight [kg]

59.3 ± 3.33

59.9 ± 3.40

0.49

ASA Grade

 

 

 

I

22 (73.33%)

23 (76.66%)

 

II

8 (26.66%)

7 (23.33%)

 

Distribution of systolic blood pressure (SBP) at various intervals between the two groups and p value is statistically significant at time of intubation, 15 min after pneumoperitoneum and at the time of extubation.

 

 

Table 2: Comparison of SBP between two groups at various intervals

Systolic blood

pressure

Group D

(n=30)

Group F

(n=30)

P Value

Pre -op

124.3 ± 10.31

125 ± 10.2

0.792

Induction

112.46 ± 7.97

112 ± 7.30

0.816

Intubation

122.7 ± 10.4

130 ± 8.13

0.003

15min After PNP

123.7 ± 7.16

133 ± 6.81

0.0001

30 min After PNP

125.7 ± 6.13

127 5.54

0.392

45 min After PNP

123.7 ± 4.97

125 ± 5.18

0.325

60 min After PNP

124 ± 4.95

125 4 ±.82

0.431

Extubation

132.5 ± 3.73

134.6 ± 4.81

0.022

Post- op

126.8 ± 3.66

126 ± 4.47

0.451

Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at various intervals between the two groups and p value is statistically significant at time of intubation, 15 min after pneumoperitoneum and at the time of extubation.

 

Table 3: Comparison of diastolic blood pressure between two groups at various intervals

Diastolic

blood pressure

Group D

(n=30)

Group F

(n=30)

P Value

Pre -op

80.1 ± 8.87

77 ± 7.3

0.144

Induction

75.06 ± 8.84

72 ± 6.7

0.136

Intubation

78.9 ± 8.32

86.2 ± 4.56

0.0001

15min After PNP

80.2 ± 6.69

85 ± 4.8

0.0023

30 min After PNP

78.53 ± 5.77

79 ± 4.8

0.732

45 min After PNP

77.67 ± 4.61

75.9 ± 4.02

0.118

60 min After PNP

74.6 ± 3.9

75.7 ± 4.79

0.334

Extubation

80 ± 4.26

83.6 ± 4.91

0.003

Post- op

76.1 ± 3.79

77.5 ± 4.32

0.183

Heart rate at various intervals between the two groups and p value is statistically significant at time of intubation, 15 min,30 min after pneumoperitoneum and at the time of extubation

Table 4: Comparison of heart rate between two groups at various intervals

Heart rate

Group D (n=30)

Group F (n=30)

P Value

Pre -op

77.3 ± 7.25

80 ± 5.3

0.105

Induction

78.36 ± 5.14

76 ± 8.4

0.194

Intubation

72.07 ± 5.39

86 ± 5.4

0.0001

15min After PNP

71 ± 4.72

86 ± 4.2

0.0001

30 min After PNP

75.3 ± 5.63

78.2 ± 5.09

0.040

45 min After PNP

74.33 ± 4.759

75.5 ± 4.22

0.317

60 min After PNP

74.7 ± 4.316

74.8 ± 4.29

0.928

Extubation

76.1 ± 3.78

85.9 ± 5.44

0.0001

Post- op

74.97 ± 4.37

76.6 ± 4.58

0.163

 

DISCUSSION

In laparoscopic surgery, CO2 is routinely used to create pneumoperitoneum. Elevated intra-abdominal pressure induced by pneumoperitoneum and CO2 itself produce some adverse effects on the cardiovascular system. Immediately after pneumoperitoneum, plasma level of norepinephrine, epinephrine and plasma renin activity is increased. Increased catecholamine level activates the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS) leading to some characteristic haemodynamic alterations which include:

1.            Decreased cardiac output (25-35%)

2.            Elevated mean arterial pressure.

3.            Increased systemic / pulmonary vascular resistance.5

To attenuate this hemodynamic response, a wide variety of agents such as beta blockers, α2 agonists, magnesium sulphate, opioids, vasodilators, and gasless are being used both during premedication and induction, to negate the hemodynamic variations.6 In a study by Jaakola et al.,7 found decreased BP and HR during intubations following the administration of 0.6 μg/kg bolus of dexmedetomidine preoperatively. After intubation, maximum heart rate was 18% and the maximum IOP was 27%, less in the dexmedetomidine group compared with the patients treated with placebo. Within 10 min after intubation, maximum systolic and diastolic arterial pressures were also significantly smaller in the dexmedetomidine group. Lawrence et al.,8 noted that a single dose of dexmedetomidine (2μg/kg) before induction of anesthesia attenuated the hemodynamic response to intubation and extubation. The haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation and extubation was reduced in the dexmedetomidine group as was intra- operative heart rate variability; postoperative analgesic and anti-emetic requirements and peri- operative serum catecholamine concentrations were lower in the dexmedetomidine group. Similar findings were noted in present study. Sukminder et al.9 studied attenuation of pressor response and dose sparing of opioids anesthetics with pre-operative dexmedetomidine with 1mcg/kg of dexmedetomidine and 2mcg/kg fentanyl pre operatively in respected groups. The pressor response to laryngoscopy, intubation, surgery and extubation were effectively decreased by dexmedetomidine, and were highly significant on comparison. The mean dose of fentanyl and isoflurane were also decreased significantly (>50%) by the administration of dexmedetomidine. The mean recovery time was also shorter in group D as compared with group F. Amar Prakash kataria et al.10 evaluated the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl in attenuation of pressor responses to laryngoscopy, intubation and pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. They noted that requirements of additional opioids and inhalational agents are more with the group F than with that of the group D. Use of dexmedetomidine has reduced the use of the induction, inhalational agents and analgesics. Jayshree P Vaswani et al.11 compared the effect of dexmedetomidine vs fentanyl on hemodynamic response in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Dexmedetomidine significantly attenuates stress response at intubation with lesser increase in HR (5% Vs 18%), SBP (9% Vs 19%) and DBP (3% Vs 15%), MAP (2% Vs 15%) as compared to fentanyl (p<0.05). In several study reports, dexmedetomidine infusion rates ranging from 0.1 to 1.0 μg/kg/hr have been used. The studies with higher infusion rates had more incidences of adverse effects like hypotension and bradycardia.9,12 The patient group received dexmedetomidine significantly lowered the HR,SBP,DBP and MAP and also reduced the analgesic requirements and inhalational agents intra operatively than the group received the fentanyl. The incidence of the side effects like hypotension and bradycardia was minimal with the dexmedetomidine. The incidence of pruritus and bradycardia were also minimal with the fentanyl. Limitations of present study were small sample size, parameters such as cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance and serum catecholamine levels were not measured.

 

CONCLUSION

Intravenous premedication with infusion of dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg over 10min as loading dose followed by 0.2mcg/kg/hr as maintenance dose still surgery is over in patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic procedures., may be recommended for better haemodynamic stability during perioperative period despite high cost.

 

REFERENCES

  • Wittgen CM, Andrus CH, Fitzgerald SD, Baudendistel LJ, Dahms TE, Kaminski DL. Analysis of the hemodynamic and ventilatory effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Archives of Surgery. 1991 Aug 1;126(8):997-1001.
  • Turan G, Ozgultekin A, Turan C, Dincer E, Yuksel G. Advantageous effects of dexmedetomidine on haemodynamic and recovery responses during extubation for intracranial surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol2008;25:816-820.
  • Yaster M, Kost-Byerly S, Maxwell LG. Opioid agonists and antagonists. Pain in infants, children, and adolescents. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.2003:181-224.
  • Basar H, Akpinar S, Doganci N, Buyukkocak U, Kaymak Ç, Sert O, Apan A. The effects of preanesthetic, single-dose dexmedetomidine on induction, hemodynamic, and cardiovascular parameters. Journal of clinical anesthesia. 2008 Sep 1;20(6):431-6.
  • O'leary E, Hubbard K, Tormey W, Cunningham AJ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: haemodynamic and neuroendocrine responses after pneumoperitoneum and changes in position. British journal of anaesthesia. 1996 May 1;76(5):640-4.
  • Stoelting RK. Pharmacology and physiology in anaesthetic practice, Lippincott William and Wilkins, 4thedition, 2006 chapter 15, page340-345.
  • Jaakola ML, Ali-Melkkilä T, Kanto J, Kallio A, Scheinin H, Scheinin M. Dexmedetomidine reduces intraocular pressure, intubation responses and anaesthetic requirements in patients undergoing ophthalmic surgery. Br J Anaesth1992;68:570– 575.
  • Lawrence CJ, De Lange S. Effects of a single pre‐operative dexmedetomidine dose on isoflurane requirements and peri‐operative haemodynamic stability. Anaesthesia. 1997 Jul;52(8):736-45.
  • Bajwa SJ, Kaur J, Singh A, Parmar SS, Singh G, Kulshrestha A, Gupta S, Sharma V, Panda A. Attenuation of pressor response and dose sparing of opioids and anaesthetics with pre-operative dexmedetomidine. Indian journal of anaesthesia. 2012 Mar;56(2):123.
  • Kataria AP, Attri JP, Kashyap R, Mahajan L. Efficacy of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on pressor response and pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesthesia, essays and researches. 2016 Sep;10(3):446.
  • Vaswani JP, Debata D, Vyas V, Pattil S. Comparative Study of the Effect of Dexmedetomidine Vs. Fentanyl on Haemodynamic Response in Patients Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Surgery. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2017 Sep;11(9):UC04.
  • Neil L, Patel A. Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl on Haemodynamic Response to Patients Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Surgery: A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR. 2017 Apr;11(4):UC01.











 


 

 


 

 

 











 



 








 





Policy for Articles with Open Access:

Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Pediatrics (Print ISSN: 2579-0897) (Online ISSN: 2636-4662) agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.