Home About Us Contact Us

 

Table of Content - Volume 20 Issue 3 - December 2021


 

Comparative study of onset and duration of sensory block with magnesium sulphate and bupivacaine versus bupivacaine only in axillary brachial plexus block under ultrasound guidance

 

Priyanshu Sharma1, Ambika Negi2*, Richi Chauhan3, Lalit Mohan Negi4

 

1,3Department of Anaesthesia, Civil Hospital Theog, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, INDIA.

2Department of Anaesthesia DDU Zonal Hospital Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, INDIA.

4S.R, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, KNH Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, INDIA.

Email: priyanshusharma27@gmail.com

 

Abstract              Background: The axillary approach is most commonly used in hand, wrist and lower forearm surgeries because it is relatively easy and has few side-effects. Addition of adjuncts not only decreases onset of block but also prolong the effect of local anaesthetics to provide adequate and long post-operative analgesia. In present study, we compared onset and duration of sensory block with magnesium sulphate and bupivacaine versus bupivacaine only in axillary brachial plexus block under ultrasound guidance. Material and Methods: Present study was a controlled prospective randomized study, conducted in 18-70 years age patients, ASA status I/II posted for elective forearm and hand surgeries under axillary brachial plexus block. Patients were randomly allocated in group M (30 ml 0.375 % bupivacaine + 250 mg magnesium sulphate) and group P (30 ml 0.375% bupivacaine). Results: In present study 30 patients each were randomly allocated group M and group P. General characteristics such as age, gender and ASA status were comparable in both groups. The onset for sensory block for group M was 9.47 ± 2.60 min, in group P was 13.57 ± 3.48 min and difference was highly significant (p value < 0.001). The mean duration of block in group M was 8.48 ± 1.64 hrs and in group P was 5.55 ± 0.86 hrs with p values < 0.001 which was highly significant. The mean value of motor blockade was graded according to Modified bromage scale for group M was 2.56 ± 0.50 and for group P was 2.70 ± 0.47, difference was not significant. The mean duration of demand of rescue analgesia in group M was 8.48 ± 1.64 hrs. and in Group P was 5.55 ± 0.86 hrs. with highly significant p values of <0.001. Conclusion: Magnesium sulphate with bupivacaine as compared to plain bupivacaine had early onset of sensory block, increase in duration of sensory block, better analgesia without any significant untoward side effect.

Keywords: sensory block, bupivacaine, magnesium sulphate, axillary brachial plexus block.

 

INTRODUCTION

Pain is a distressing feeling often caused by intense or damaging stimuli. For all the patient undergoing surgery, intraoperative and postoperative pain is an anticipated and feared consequences. Peripheral nerve blocks not only provide intraoperative anaesthesia but also extend analgesia in the post-operative period without any systemic side-effects. A variety of approaches to the brachial plexus block have been described such as supraclavicular, axillary, interscalene etc. The axillary approach is most commonly used in hand, wrist and lower forearm surgeries because it is relatively easy and has few side-effects.1 For axillary brachial plexus block ultrasound guidance continues to grow in popularity as a method of nerve localization and has the advantage of allowing real time visualization of the plexus, pleura and vessels along with the needle and local anaesthetic spread.2 Addition of adjuncts not only decreases onset of block but also prolong the effect of local anaesthetics to provide adequate and long post-operative analgesia. Opioids (buprenorphine, morphine, fentanyl, tramadol), NMDA antagonists (ketamine, magnesium), GABA agonists (midazolam), adrenergic agonists (adrenaline, clonidine, dexmedetomidine),3,4 corticosteroids (dexamethasone),5 COX inhibitors (ketorolac), Ach esterase inhibitors (neostigmine) etc. were studied as adjuvants in peripheral nerve blocks. In present study, we compared onset and duration of sensory block with magnesium sulphate and bupivacaine versus bupivacaine only in axillary brachial plexus block under ultrasound guidance.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Present study was a controlled prospective randomized study, conducted in department of anaesthesiology and Intensive Care at Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla. Study period was from August 2018 to July 2019 (1 year). Study was approved by institutional ethical committee

Inclusion criteria: 18-70 years age patients, ASA status I/II posted for elective forearm and hand surgeries.

Exclusion criteria: Uncontrolled hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Infection at injection site. Known hypersensitivity to local anesthetic agent. Coagulopathy. Not willing to participate Patients demographic details, examination findings, laboratory and radiological investigations were noted. Pre anaesthetic evaluation and fitness done. Fit patients were kept nil per orally for 6 hrs. before the scheduled surgery. The nature of study was explained to the patient and his attendants in their own language and written informed consent was obtained from the patient for participation in present study. Patients were randomly allocated to one of the two groups.

Group M: were given axillary brachial plexus block under ultrasound guidance with 0.375 % bupivacaine + 250 mg magnesium sulphate (total volume- 30 ml).

Group P: were given axillary brachial plexus block under ultrasound guidance with 0.375% bupivacaine (total volume 30 ml). In operation theatre, pulse rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation (SpO2), noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) and ECG were recorded. Slow intravenous injection fentanyl 50 microgram was given to all the patients before performing the axillary brachial plexus block. Axillary brachial plexus block was given under all aseptic precautions, under ultrasound guidance. Sensory block assessment was done by Hollmen's scale and motor block by modified bromage scale. Degree of motor block was graded according to modified bromage Scale for upper limb before the start of surgery.


 

Modified Bromage Scale

Degree 0

Absence of movements

Degree 1

Discrete movements (trembling) of muscle groups

Degree 2

Ability to move against gravity, but not against resistance

Degree 3

Strength reduction, but able to move against resistance

Degree 4

Full strength in relevant muscle groups

The duration of block was defined as the onset of block from the first rescue analgesia requirement. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) were monitored in each group upto 12 hours postoperatively. Standard post-operative care was provided. All findings were entered in Microsoft excel sheet and the results were analysed with SPSS version 22. Results were evaluated using statistical test (chi-square test and independent T test). p value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

 

RESULTS

In present study 30 patients each were randomly allocated group M and group P. General characteristics such as age, gender and ASA status were comparable in both groups.

Table 1: General characteristics

Characteristics

GROUP M (n=30)

GROUP P (n=30)

Age (in years)

39.27 ±15.52

33.03 ±11.22

Gender - M/F

27/3

26/4

ASA I/II

22/8

23/7

 

The onset for sensory block for group M was 9.47 ± 2.60 min, in group P was 13.57 ± 3.48 min and difference was highly significant (p value < 0.001). The mean duration of block in group M was 8.48 ± 1.64 hrs and in group P was 5.55 ± 0.86 hrs with p values < 0.001 which was highly significant. The mean value of motor blockade was graded according to Modified bromage scale for group M was 2.56 ± 0.50 and for group P was 2.70 ± 0.47, difference was not significant. The mean duration of demand of rescue analgesia in group M was 8.48 ± 1.64 hrs. and in Group P was 5.55 ± 0.86 hrs. with highly significant p values of <0.001. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, Respiratory rate was monitored in each group in intraoperative and postoperative period upto 12 hrs. and were comparable between two groups at all time intervals.

Table 2: Intra-operative and post-operative findings

Findings

GROUP M (n=30)

GROUP P (n=30)

p value

Age (in years)

39.27 ±15.52

33.03 ±11.22

 

Gender - M/F

27/3

26/4

 

ASA I/II

22/8

23/7

 

Onset of sensory block (min)

9.47 ±2.60

13.57 ± 3.48

<0.001

Duration of block (hrs)

8.48 ± 1.64

5.55 ± 0.86

< 0.001

Degree of block (Modified bromage scale)

2.56 ± 0.50

2.70 ± 0.47

0.268

Rescue analgesia (hrs)

8.48 ± 1.64

5.55 ± 0.86

< 0.001

 

Patients were observed for any side effects intraoperatively and postoperatively such as nausea, vomiting, local trauma, giddiness, bradycardia and tachycardia. In our study no patients in group M complained of nausea and 2 complained of giddiness and in group P, 2 patients complained of nausea and one of giddiness.

Table 3: Side Effects

Side effects

GROUP - M (n- 30)

GROUP P (n- 30)

Nausea

0

2 (7%)

Giddiness

2 (7%)

1 (3%)

 


DISCUSSION

The axillary approach to brachial plexus blockade provides satisfactory anaesthesia for elbow, forearm, and hand surgery and also provides reliable cutaneous anaesthesia of the inner upper arm including the medial cutaneous nerve of arm and inter costobrachial nerve, areas that are often missed with other approaches.6 In addition, the axillary approach remains the safest of the four main options, as it does not risk blockade of the phrenic nerve and it does not have the potential to cause pneumothorax, making it an ideal option for day care surgery.7 The role of NMDA receptor in pain transmission has long been understood. Blocking NMDA subtype of glutamate receptors reduce the afferent stimulation of spinal cord and therefore blocking the pain transmission. Magnesium sulphate has known to inhibit nociception through its NMDA receptor antagonistic properties making it a suitable adjuvant for brachial plexus block with local anaesthetic drug.8 In present study patients receiving 0.375 % bupivacaine with 250 mg MgSO4 had early onset of sensory block and duration of block was prolonged as compared to the group receiving plane bupivacaine. Similar findings were noted by Verma V et al.9 Kasturi Mukherjee et al.,10 studied elective forearm and hand surgeries in 100 patients, randomly and in double blind fashion divided into group RM (30ml 0.5% ropivacaine plus 150mg MgSO4) and in group RN (30ml 0.5 % ropivacaine plus 1ml NS). They noted that duration of sensory block was increased in group RM, similar to present study. While time of onset of sensory blockade was slightly increased in group RM, where as in present study onset of sensory blockade was reduced in magnesium group as compared to plain bupivacaine group. Haghighi M et al.,11 investigated the effect of magnesium sulphate to lidocaine to extend the duration of sensory and motor blocks of the axillary plexus in orthopedic surgeries of the upper extremities and concluded that the addition of magnesium sulphate increases the duration of motor and sensory block as compared to the use of lidocaine alone. Gunduz A, et al.,12 studied the effect of the addition of magnesium in 60 patients scheduled for forearm and hand surgeries under axillary brachial plexus block. They concluded that addition of magnesium sulphate to 2% prilocaine for axillary brachial plexus block provided marked prolongation of sensory and motor blockade. In a study by Reza akhondzade et al.,13 investigated effect of adding magnesium sulfate to lidocaine on postoperative pain in upper limb surgeries by supraclavicular brachial plexus block under ultrasound guidance and concluded that postoperative VAS values at 24 hours were significantly lower in group M (lidocaine 1% +fentanyl 50 µg + magnesium sulphate 20% 5ml) than group N (lidocaine + 50µg fentanyl + normal saline 5ml). Sensory and motor block onset and duration were also statistically longer in group M than in group N. Gyu Choi et al.,14 studied patients undergoing upper extremity surgery as 0.2% ropivacaine 20 ml with normal saline 2 ml versus 0.2% ropivacaine 20 ml with MgSO4 200 mg via axillary brachial plexus block just before extubation. The post-operative visual analogue scale (VAS), opioid consumption and side effects were recorded. The results of this study showed no difference in VAS scores and no statistically significant difference in opioid consumption between the two groups. Side effects were recorded and the results were similar to our study with no significant adverse effects noted between the two groups. Peripheral nerve blocks provide intraoperative anaesthesia, extends analgesia in the post-operative period without any systemic side-effects and had advantages over general anaesthesia like avoiding airway instrumentation, polypharmacy, decreased incidence of nausea and vomiting, early mobilization and extended postoperative analgesia.15

 

CONCLUSION

Magnesium sulphate with bupivacaine as compared to plain bupivacaine had early onset of sensory block, increase in duration of sensory block, better analgesia without any significant untoward side effect.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Gupta AN. An open label randomized study on axillary vis a vis supraclavicular approaches for brachial plexus in forearm surgery. Asian Journal of medical sciences. 2017 ; 8 (1) :71-76.
  2. Qin Qin, Debao Yang, Hong Xie, Liyuan Zhang, Chen Wang. Ultrasound guidance improves the success rate of axillary plexus block.Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2016 ; 66(2) :115-19.
  3. Popping DM, Elia N, Marret E, Wenk M, Tramèr MR. Clonidine as an adjuvant to local anaesthetic for peripheral nerve and plexus blocks: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Anesthesiology 2009; 111:406-15.
  4. Swami SS, Keniya VM, Ladi SD, Rao R. Comparison of dexmedetomidine and clonidine (α2 agonist drugs) as an adjuvant to local anaesthesia in supraclavicular brachial plexus block: A randomised double-blind prospective study. Indian J Anaesth 2012;56:243-9.
  5. Jadon A, Dixit S, Kedia SK, Chakraborty S, Agrawal A, Sinha N. Interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder arthroscopic surgery: Prospective randomised controlled study of effects of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine with dexamethasone. Indian J Anaesth 2015;59 :171-6.
  6. Urban MK, Urquhart B: Evaluation of brachial plexus anesthesia for upper extremity surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1994;19:175–182.
  7. Baranowski AP, Pither CE: A comparison of three methods of axillary brachial plexus anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1990;45:362–65.
  8. Begon S, Pickering G, Dubray C. Magnesium increases morphine analgesic effect in different experimental models of pain. Anesthesiology 2002 ;96:627-32.
  9. Verma V, Rana S, Chaudhary SK, et al. A dose - finding randomized controlled trial of magnesium sulphate as an adjuvant in ultrasound –guided supraclaviular brachial plexus block. Indian J Anaesthesia 2017;61:250-5.
  10. Mukherjee K, Das A, Basunia SR, et al. Evaluation of Magnesium as an adjuvant in Ropivacaine-induced supraclavicular brachial plexus block. J Res Pharm Practs. 2014;3 :123-9.
  11. Haghighi M, Soleymanha M, Sedighinejad A, et al. The effect of magnesium sulfate on motor and sensory axillary plexus blockade. Anesth Pain Med. 2015;5(1).
  12. Gunduz A, Bilir A, Gulec S. Magnesium added to prilocaine prolongs the duration of axillary plexus block. Reg Anaesth Pain Med 2006;31:233-36
  13. Akhondzade R, Nesioonpour S, Gousheh M, Soltani F, Davarimoghadam M. The Effect of Magnesium Sulfate on Postoperative Pain in Upper Limb Surgeries by Supraclavicular Block Under Ultrasound Guidance. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. 2017 ;7:142-32.
  14. Gyu Choi, Young Soon Choi, Yong Ho Kim, et al. The effects of postoperative brachial plexus block using Mgso4 in postoperative analgesia in upper extremity surgery. Korean J Pain 2011;24(3):158-63.
  15. Wahaba WM, Don HF, Craig DB. Post operative epidural analgesia: effects on lung volume. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1975; 22: 519-527.




 



































 








 




 








 

 









Policy for Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology (Print ISSN:2579-0900) (Online ISSN: 2636-4654) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.