Home About Us Contact Us

 

Table of Content - Volume 21 Issue 3 - March 2022


 

Efficacy of intravenous nitroglycerine in attenuation of hemodynamic response to tracheal extubation

 

Kiran Kumar Suggala1, Mullangi Himabindu2*, Yugandhar Kandula3

 

1Professor, 2PG, 3Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Mamata Medical College, Manikya Nagar Basti, Khammam, INDIA.

Email: dochima2013@gmail.com

 

Abstract              Background: Extubation is associated with awakening, pain, anxiety, and airway irritation which may lead to hemodynamic responses similar to intubation resulting in hypertension, tachycardia, and arrhythmia. Ideal agent for bunting the extubation response should be non-sedative short-acting with no respiratory depressant action and non-anesthetic. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of intravenous nitroglycerine for attenuating hemodynamic response to tracheal extubation in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Methods: After ethical committee approval, 100 patients aged between 18 – 60 years ASA I & II patients posted for elective surgeries after taking informed consent were included in the study and divided in four groups with 25 members in each group. We have excluded patients with pre-existing hemodynamic instability, ASA III, IV& V patients, emergency surgeries, bleeding disorders, pregnant, lactating females and patients requiring post operative ventilator support. GROUP A: Normotensive with NTG. GROUP C: Hypertensive with NTG. Group B and D are given placebo with NS. Results: Results showed significant increase in heart rate in all the groups During extubation the increase in heart rate was not increased statistically in group A when compared to group B,C,D. There is significant increase in systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure in all the groups, and during extubation, attenuation of extubation response is seen in groups treated with NTG. Conclusion: Administration of IV NTG in a dose of 1-2 mcg/kg body weight proved to be effective and easy and safe in normotensive and hypertensive patients during extubation. Rise in systolic, diastolic and MAP are significantly controlled with NTG. After surgery, it stabilizes hemodynamics and allows easy recovery.

Key Word: intravenous nitroglycerine, hemodynamic.

 

INTRODUCTION

Tracheal extubation is the discontinuation of an artificial airway when the indications for its placement like general anesthesia, airway obstruction, protection of airway, suctioning, ventilatory failure and hypoxemia no longer exist. Many investigators have documented that tracheal extubation causes transient increase in blood pressure and heart rate.1-3 Stimulus causing such increase in hemodynamic are multifactorial like, light plane of anesthesia, pain at surgical site, emergence from anesthesia or tracheobronchial irritation and reflex sympathetic discharge caused by epipharyngeal and laryngopharyngeal stimulation.4 This results in hypertension, tachycardia and arrhythmias, which are usually variable and unpredictable. Airway irritation during tracheal extubation may cause cough or difficulty in breathing which contributes change in hemodynamics.5 The majority of patients are able to tolerate those responses without any significant consequences. However some patients with co-existing disease may not tolerate these responses.5 There is a risk of myocardial ischemia/ infarction, cerebrovascular accident. Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in patient with hypertension, produces greater increase in arterial pressure than in normotensive patients. Thus it is reasonable to expect that hypertensive patients may exhibit an exaggerated hypertensive response to awakening and extubation compared to normotensive patients. Such hypertensive episodes may result in cardiac or cerebral complications.6 In the patient with coronary artery disease, hemodynamic response like tachycardia to extubation may lead to imbalance between myocardial oxygen supply and demand, resulting in myocardial ischemia. The occurrence of perioperative myocardial ischemia may be associated with subsequent development of postoperative myocardial infarction. Various drugs have been used to inhibit or reduce the hemodynamic response, including verapamil,7 diltiazem, esmolol,8 and magnesium sulfate.9 In cases where preadministration with fentanyl is insufficient, nitroglycerin is another option used in some studies to prevent hemodynamic stress-induced ischemia.10 Nitroglycerin is a vasodilator that acts on vascular smooth muscle and is taken intravenously mixed with 5% dextrose or propylene glycol. Also, it is used as topical or as a spray in the nose. This drug is not toxic and rapidly metabolizes. Its dilating effect on the veins is noticeable, but it also dilates the arteries dose dependently. This drug is used in heart surgeries and hip surgery. Its rapid, reversible effect is similar to nitroprusside and is a reason for its use in anesthesia and CCU.[11] It has a beneficial effect on reducing afterload and preload in patients with heart failure.12 So the present study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous nitroglycerine for attenuating hemodynamic response to tracheal extubation in normotensive and hypertensive patients.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample size: Based on a pilot study, we found that the systolic blood pressure (SBP) increased in 70% of patients in the control group as compared to 25% of patients who received IV NTG. Taking into account an alpha error of <0.05 and a power of 0.8 we calculated that a total of 100 patients divided into four groups each consisting of 25 patients were required to detect a significant difference.

n= sample size per group before dropout

Zα/2- Standard normal z-value for a significance level of α=0.05, which is 1.96

Zβ- Standard normal z-value for a power of 80%, which is 0.8

After ethical committee approval, 100 patients aged between 18 – 60 years ASA I and II patients posted for elective surgeries after taking informed consent were included in the study and divided in four groups with 25 members in each group. We have excluded patients with pre-existing hemodynamic instability, ASA III, IV patients, emergency surgeries, bleeding disorders, pregnant, lactating females and patients requiring post operative ventilator support.

GROUP A: Normotensive with NTG

GROUP C: Hypertensive with NTG

Group B: Normotensive with Placebo

Group D: Hypertensive with Placebo

Monitoring: Values of HR, SBP, DBP, and MAP noted immediately after extubation at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 min after tracheal extubation. IV NTG is started with 1-2 mcg/kg during surgery and continued till extubation. Reversal injection NTG is started with 1-2 mcg/kg during surgery and continued till extubation. neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg + injection glycopyrrolate 0.01 mg/kg i.v. were given.

Statistical analysis: Statistical evaluation of data or parameters will be done using-mean, average, standard deviation, and ANOVA for comparison of results. Data were entered into Microsoft excel data sheet and were analyzed using SPSS 22 Statistics Desktop-IBM. USA.

 


RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the demographics among the study groups. The results were shown in table 1.

Parameters

Group A

Group B

Group C

Group D

P value

Age

56.76±3.76

52.65±4.12

54.12±6.74

55.34±7.21

0.876

Weight

63.4±8.7

61.1±10.3

63.3±7.0

63.7±8.1

0.466

Gender (M/F)

15/10

17/8

13/12

16/9

0.346

ASA (I/II)

16/9

15/10

14/11

12/13

0.876

 

Heart rate: At prereversal, no difference in HR was observed between four groups Whereas postextubation significant difference in HR was observed from 1 to 10 min between four groups. Post hoc Bonferroni analysis showed that the difference in mean HR was statistically significant between Group C in comparison with Group A and Group B from 1 min postextubation to 10 min. There was no significant difference in HR between Group A and Group B at all the intervals (table 1)

 

 

Table 1: Heart rate among the groups

Heart rate

Group A

Group B

Group C

Group D

P value

Prereversal

109.9±8.0

110.3±10.6

109.1±11.0

111.2±14.0

0.866

Postextubation

 

 

 

 

 

1 min

99.3±8.4

100.9±10.9

106.2±11.9

101.45±12.6

0.019*

2 min

91.9±8.1

94.2±8.9

103.7±12.2

95.65±8.92

<0.001*

3 min

85.3±7.0

87.4±6.6

101.1±11.8

88.12±9.12

<0.001*

5 min

78.3±5.7

81.5±6.0

99.4±11.8

80.23±8.12

<0.001*

10 min

71.9±5.3

74.6±5.5

97.7±12.0

73.45±7.12

<0.001*

*Significant. SD=Standard deviation

 

Systolic blood pressure: At prereversal, significant difference in SBP was observed between four groups. During postextubation, significant difference in SBP was observed from 2 to 10 min between four groups. Post hoc Bonferroni analysis showed that the difference in mean SBP was statistically significant between Group C in comparison with Group A, Group B and Group D from 2 min postextubation to 10 min. There was no significant difference in SBP between Group A, Group B and Group D at all the intervals.

Table 2: Comparison of systolic blood pressure among the groups

SBP

Group A

Group B

Group C

Group D

P value

Prereversal

160.5±12.3

155.8±9.6

153.2±9.6

161.2±11.2

0.016*

Postextubation

 

 

 

 

 

1 min

151.1±12.3

147.1±9.6

151.5±10.0

152.7±10.4

0.167

2 min

142.5±11.0

140.1±9.2

149.7±10.5

141.2±8.0

<0.001*

3 min

135.5±10.8

133.7±8.7

147.9±10.3

134.1±11.2

<0.001*

5 min

127.4±9.4

127.5±8.4

146.2±10.1

128.6±11.4

<0.001*

10 min

119.0±8.6

118.4±7.4

144.6±10.1

   120.4±9.4

     <0.001*

 

Diastolic blood pressure: At prereversal, no significant difference in DBP was observed between four groups. During postextubation, significant difference in DBP was observed from 1 to 10 min between four groups. Post hoc Bonferroni analysis showed that the difference in mean SBP was statistically significant between Group C in comparison with Group A, Group B and Group D from 1 min postextubation to 10 min. There was also significant difference in DBP between Group A, Group B and Group D at 2 and 3 min intervals (table 3).

Table 3: Comparison of diastolic blood pressure among the groups

DBP

Group A

   Group B

Group C

Group D

P value

Prereversal

102.1±6.4

 104.2±7.4

103.9±7.1

103.1±9.4

0.379

Postextubation

 

 

 

 

 

1 min

93.1±5.3

96.5±5.1

101.7±7.2

98.8±7.1

<0.001

2 min

86.9±5.2

90.7±4.2

100.2±7.3

91.2±6.6

<0.001*

3 min

81.0±6.3

84.7±5.2

98.8±7.1

86.6±5.2

<0.001*

5 min

75.3±6.4

78.7±6.1

97.2±7.3

79.1±8.2

<0.001*

10 min

69.4±6.4

72.2±6.5

95.5±7.5

75.1±7.8

<0.001*

 

Mean arterial pressure: At prereversal no significant difference in MAP was observed b/w four groups. During postextubation significant difference in MAP was observed from 1 to 10 min between four groups. Post hoc Bonferroni analysis showed that the difference in mean SBP was statistically significant between Group C in comparison with Group A, Group B and Group D from 1 min postextubation to 10 min. There was no significant difference in MAP between Group A, Group B and Group D at all intervals (table 4).

Table 4: Mean arterial pressure among the study groups

MAP

Group A

    Group B

    Group C

   Group D

   P value

Prereversal

121.5±6.7

  121.4±7.1

  120.3±7.3

 122.5±8.2

    0.731

Postextubation

 

 

 

 

 

1 min

112.5±6.2

 113.1±5.5

  118.1±7.4

 114.2±6.2

0.001*

2 min

105.3±6.1

107.0±4.8

116.6±7.6

108.0±7.8

<0.001*

3 min

99.1±6.6

101.0±5.5

115.1±7.5

102.8±5.8

<0.001*

5 min

92.5±6.4

94.7±6.1

113.5±7.7

91.2±8.2

<0.001*

10 min

85.7±6.1

87.4±6.0

111.9±7.9

88.5±7.2

<0.001*

 


DISCUSSION

The basic idea of using any drug for attenuating the hypertensive response to tracheal extubation is that its peak effect should correspond to that of the stimulus. During extubation, heart rate was found to be increased in NTG groups, it was not statistically significant in normotensive group, but was found to be significant in hypertensive group when compared with control group. The systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure was found to be significantly lower in NTG groups as compared to control groups during extubation. After NTG, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure were under control within two minutes of medication and remained close to baseline during extubation, whereas in control group systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure were found to be persistently high during extubation, coming to baseline after six minutes of extubation.

 

CONCLUSION    

This study concludes that intravenous NTG before extubation significantly attenuates the hemodynamic and airway responses to extubation with prolonged time for extubation and with side effects like bradycardia and hypotension compared to placebo.

 

REFERENCES     

  1. Lowrie A, Johnston PL, Fell D, Robinson SL. Cardiovascular and Plasma Catecholamine Responses at Tracheal Extubation. Br J Anaesth. 1992; 68:261-3.
  2. Dyson A, Isaac PA, Pennant JH, Giesecke AH, Lipton JM. Esmolol attenuates cardiovascular responses to extubation. Anesth Analg. 1990 Dec;71(6):675-8.
  3. Fuhrman TM, Ewell CL, Pippin WD, Weaver JM. Comparison of the efficacy of esmolol and alfentanil to attenuate the hemodynamic responses to emergence and extubation. J Clin Anesth.1992;4(6):444-7.
  4. Goarya RS, Mathur A. I/V bolus dexmedetomidine attenuates the airway reflexes and hemodynamic responses during extubation following general anaesthesia. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2014 Nov 25;3(65):14114-28.
  5. Hartley M, Vaughan RS. Problems associated with tracheal extubation. Br J Anaesth. 1993;71:561-8
  6. Does perioperative myocardial ischemia lead to postoperative myocardial infarction? Anesthesiology. 1985 Feb;62(2):107-14.
  7. Mikawa K, Nishina K, Takao Y, Shiga M, Maekawa N, Obara H. Attenuation of cardiovascular responses to tracheal extubation: comparison of verapamil, lidocaine, and verapamil-lidocaine combination. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 1997 Nov 1;85(5):1005-10.
  8. Bostan H, Eroglu A. Comparison of the clinical efficacies of fentanyl, esmolol and lidocaine in preventing the hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation and extubation. Journal of Current Surgery. 2012;2(1):24-8.
  9. Goyal S, Shrivastava S. Effect of intravenous magnesium sulphate on cardiovascular responses during tracheal extubation in patient undergoing craniotomies. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2017 May 29;6(43):3367-71.
  10. Mikawa K, Hasegawa M, Suzuki T, Maekawa N, Kaetsu H, Goto R, Yaku H, Obara H. Attenuation of hypertensive response to tracheal intubation with nitroglycerin. Journal of clinical anesthesia. 1992 Sep 1;4(5):367-71.
  11. Chelly J, Tannières ML, Schmitt H, Passelecq J. Pharmacology of nitroglycerin (author's transl). Anesthesie, analgesie, reanimation. 1979 May 1;36(5-6):215-24.
  12. Curyło AM. Use of nitroglycerin in the treatment of congestive heart failure. Folia Medica Cracoviensia. 1989 Jan 1;30(1-2):23-9.





 



 





 



































 








 




 








 

 









Policy for Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology (Print ISSN:2579-0900) (Online ISSN: 2636-4654) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.