Home About Us Contact Us

 

Table of Content - Volume 21 Issue 3 - March 2022


 

Ultrasound guided, inguinal ligament-based approach to pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block: An effective alternative to Fascia Iliaca and Femoral nerve block for analgesia in patients posted for hip surgery - A feasibility study

 

Swetha P1, Manjula R2, Prathibha P3*

 

1Assistant Professor, 2Professor, 3Junior Resident, Department of Anesthesiology, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B.G.Nagara, Mandya 571448, Karnataka, INDIA.

Email: prathibhapartheeban@gmail.com

 

Abstract              Background: Fascia Iliaca and Femoral nerve blocks are used frequently in patients posted for hip surgery, for analgesia and adequate positioning to aid central neuraxial blockade (CNB). They are known for their feasibility, opioid sparing effects and reduction in opioid related adverse effects. Recently in 2018, Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block was described for analgesia in hip fracture patients as an alternative to Fascia Iliaca and Femoral Nerve blocks. Aims And Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of this technique in providing analgesia for effective positioning and aiding the CNB in patients posted for hip surgeries such as, hip replacement, Neck of femur fracture, Intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fracture and to study block related complications. Materials And Methods: Total 25 patients of ASA I and II, between the age group of 18-80 years, posted for hip surgery under CNB, were selected for this study. PENG block was administered in these patients in the procedure room before shifting on operation table, using ultrasound and inguinal ligament as landmark. 20ml of 0.5% Ropivacaine was the local anesthetic used for the study. The comfort during positioning for Spinal/ Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia was assessed by Ease of Spinal Position score (EOSP). Results: All 25 patients had successful block and could sit comfortably during CNB. Median EOSP score was 3 (2-3). No complications were observed. Conclusion: PENG block is a good alternative to Fascia Iliaca and Femoral Nerve block in patients posted for hip surgery. Inguinal ligament based, ultrasound guided PENG block provides good analgesia without complications.

 

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) are commonly given as a component of multimodal analgesia and may be administered as a single injection or continuous infusions. They demonstrate superior pain control and reduce the opioid consumption.1,2 Fascia iliaca (FI) and femoral nerve (FN) blocks are commonly practiced to provide analgesia and aid positioning for central neuraxial blocks (CNB) in patients posted for hip surgery.2 In 2018, Giron-Arango L et al., described a new block, called the PENG block, for analgesia in patients with hip fracture.3 PENG block is primarily an ultrasound guided technique, where articular branches of femoral nerve and accessory obturator nerve (AON) are blocked.3 The block area is the pelvic rim (superior pubic ramus) near iliopectineal eminence (IPE), deep to fascia of ilio-psoas muscle.3,5 However, by increasing the local anaesthetic (LA) volume, obturator, femoral, genitofemoral and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves can also be blocked.6 Hence the indications for this block are increasing, and this block has been used for surgical anaesthesia in reduction of dislocated hip and varicose vein stripping procedures.7,8 To assess the effectiveness of inguinal ligament based approach to PENG block in providing analgesia, to aid positioning for CNBs in patients posted for hip surgery [hip replacement, neck of femur (NOF) fracture, intertrochanteric (IT) and subtrochanteric (ST) fracture], we conducted a feasibility study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Primary Aim: To assess the analgesic effectiveness of the ultrasound guided PENG block with inguinal ligament as landmark.

Secondary Aim: To assess the procedural difficulty and block related complications.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After obtaining ethical committee clearance and written informed consent, 25 ASA 1 and 2 patients between the age group of 18 – 80yrs, posted for hip surgery (hip replacement, NOF fracture, IT and ST fracture) under CNB were selected. Standard NPO protocols and adequate antibiotic prophylaxis were followed. In procedure room, after connecting NIBP, SPO2 AND ECG monitors, pain intensity was assessed in supine position. After taking adequate aseptic precautions, a low frequency curvilinear ultrasound probe was placed in plane with inguinal ligament. After appreciating the femoral artery and nerve, the probe was moved cephalad in parallel to inguinal ligament, tracing the femoral artery and nerve until the pubic ramus and IPE were appreciated. With in plane approach, 20 gauge and 100mm needle was inserted from lateral to medial and needle tip was placed in the plane between the pubic ramus posteriorly and ilio-psoas muscle anteriorly avoiding injury to the femoral nerve. After negative aspiration, 20 ml of 0.5% Ropivacaine was infiltrated in this plane. Adequate LA spread i.e., lifting of the ilio-psoas muscle from the pubic ramus was appreciated. After the block, patients were shifted on to operating table and standard monitors (NIBP, SPO2 AND ECG) were attached. Adequate IV fluids were connected and later positioning for CNB was done. EOSP scoring was performed to assess the comfort during the positioning. The time elapsed between the block and EOSP scoring was roughly between 8 – 10 minutes.

Figure 1                                                            Figure 2

 

RESULTS

Successful needle placement and adequate spread of LA was appreciated in all patients. All patients were comfortable during positioning for CNB, as assessed with EOSP score (table 1). No block related complications were noticed in these patients.

 

Table 1: demographic profile, EOSP score and complications.

VRIABLES

VALUES

  1. DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

 

Gender (M:F)

14:11

Side (RIGHT:LEFT)

8:17

Mean Age

51.5 (23 – 80)

  1. EOSP SCORE

 

Median score

3 (2 – 3)

  1. COMPLICATIONS

Nil

 

DISCUSSION

Regional nerve blocks are often used for providing analgesia in patients with hip fractures. FI and FN blocks are used frequently in patients posted for hip surgery, for analgesia to aid positioning for CNB.2 A recent Cochrane review on peripheral nerve blocks in hip fractures has shown reduction in dynamic pain within 30 minutes of blockade, reduced risk for pneumonia, decreased time to first mobilization and cost reduction of the analgesic regimen (single shot blocks).4 In 2018, PENG block was described for analgesia in hip fracture patients as an alternative to FI and FN blocks by Giron-Arango L et al.3 With PENG block, obturator nerve (ON) and AON blocks are well achieved when compared to FI and FN blocks. In FI and FN blocks, medial spread of LA to block ON doesn’t occur9, and more importantly cephalad spread is unlikely to spread beyond the L5 level.1 Recent studies have shown that PENG block produces more effective analgesia for positioning and post operative pain than FI block9 In contrast, the main targets of PENG block are articular branches of AON and FN between anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) and IPE. The sub pectineal plane (SPP) between the pectineus and obturator externus muscle has been recently described by Nielsen et al.11 as a target point for ON and its articular branches. Given the proximity of the SPP, it is believed that the LA may spread to this plane. However further studies are required to confirm this. Though PENG block was described to be pericapsular nerve block, it is questionable whether it blocks only ON, AON and articular branches of FN supplying hip joint or not.6,12,13 In our study, we used inguinal crease at the inguinal ligament as the landmark for the positioning of the ultrasound probe to visualize the IPE, pubic ramus, AIIS and psoas muscle to guide the PENG block. This study shows effective block of ON and FN to reduce the dynamic pain and provide a good position for CNB. It can be further studied to identify newer indications for PENG block.7,8,14,13

 

CONCLUSION

With our results, we conclude that inguinal ligament can be used for correct positioning of ultrasound probe for PENG block, without any complications. This new approach provides effective analgesia for CNB positioning in patients posted for hip surgery.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Pagano, T., Scarpato, F., Chicone, G. etal. Analgesic evaluation of ultrasound-guided Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block for emergency hip surgery in fragile patients: a casexseries. Arthroplasty 1, 18 (2019).
  2. Jadon A, Kedia SK, Dixit S, Chakraborty S. Comparative evaluation of femoral nerve block and intravenous fentanyl for positioning during spinal anaesthesia in surgery of femur fracture. Indian J Anaesth. 2014 Nov-Dec;58(6):705-8.
  3. Girón-Arango L, Peng PWH, Chin KJ, Brull R, Perlas A. Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Hip Fracture. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Nov;43(8):859-863.
  4. Guay J, Parker MJ, Griffiths R, Kopp S. Peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 11;5(5):CD001159.
  5. Jadon A, Sinha N, Chakraborty S, Singh B, Agrawal A. Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block: A feasibility study of landmark based technique. Indian J Anaesth. 2020 Aug;64(8):710-713.
  6. Ahiskalioglu A, Aydin ME, Ahiskalioglu EO, Tuncer K, Celik M. Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for surgical anesthesia of medial thigh. J Clin Anesth. 2020 Feb;59:42-43.
  7. Ueshima H, Otake H. Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is effective for dislocation of the hip joint. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Feb;52:83.
  8. Aydin ME, Borulu F, Ates I, Kara S, Ahiskalioglu A. A Novel Indication of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block: Surgical Anesthesia for Vein Ligation and Stripping. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 Mar;34(3):843-845.
  9. Swenson JD, Davis JJ, Stream JO, Crim JR, Burks RT, Greis PE. Local anesthetic injection deep to the fascia iliaca at the level of the inguinal ligament: the pattern of distribution and effects on the obturator nerve. J Clin Anesth. 2015 Dec;27(8):652-7.
  10. K Shankar, Srinivasan Rangalakshmi, AB Ashwin, et al. Comparative study of ultrasound guided PENG [Pericapsular Nerve Group] Block and FIB [Fascia Iliaca Block] for Positioning and Postoperative Analgesia Prior to Spinal Anesthesia for Hip Surgeries: Prospective Randomised Comparative Clinical Study. Indian J Anesth Analg. 2020;7(3):798-803
  11. Nielsen TD, Moriggl B, Søballe K, Kolsen-Petersen JA, Børglum J, Bendtsen TF. A Cadaveric Study of Ultrasound-Guided Subpectineal Injectate Spread Around the Obturator Nerve and Its Hip Articular Branches. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 May/Jun;42(3):357-361.
  12. Tran J, Agur A, Peng P. Is pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block a true pericapsular block? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jan 11:rapm-2018-100278.
  13. Ahiskalioglu A, Aydin ME, Celik M, Ahiskalioglu EO, Tulgar S. Can high volume pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block act as a lumbar plexus block? J Clin Anesth. 2020 May;61:109650.
  14. Bilal B, Öksüz G, Boran ÖF, Topak D, Doğar F. High volume pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for acetabular fracture surgery: A new horizon for novel block. J Clin Anesth. 2020 Jun;62:109702.
  15. Ahiskalioglu A, Aydin ME, Ozkaya F, Ahiskalioglu EO, Adanur S. A novel indication of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block: Prevention of adductor muscle spasm. J Clin Anesth. 2020 Mar;60:51-52.



 




 







 


 


 


 



 



 





 



































 








 




 








 

 









Policy for Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology (Print ISSN:2579-0900) (Online ISSN: 2636-4654) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.