Home About Us Contact Us
`

 

Table of Content - Volume 18 Issue 1- April 2021


 

A study of the microbial spectrum involved in skin and soft tissue infections in infants at tertiary health care center

 

Ravidas Arjun Vasave1*, Shripad Taklikar2, Sujata Baveja3

 

1Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Nandurbar, Maharashtra, INDIA.

2Assistant Professor, 3Professor, Department of Microbiology, Lokmanya Tilak municipal Medical College Sion, Mumbai, Maharashtra, INDIA.

Email: ravidas.vasave.rv@gmail.com

 

Abstract              Background: Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), most commonly cellulitis or cutaneous abscess, are one of the most common infections encountered in the pediatric age group, especially in the developing world. If diagnosed early and treated appropriately, these infections are almost always curable, but some have the potential to cause serious complications such as septicemia, nephritis, carditis and arthritis if diagnosis is delayed and/or treatment is inadequate. Present study was undertaken to study microbial spectrum in skin and soft tissue infections in infants at tertiary health care center. Material and Methods: Present prospective study was undertaken in children less than one year of age with clinical features suggestive of skin and soft tissue infection. Results: A total of 250 children were included in the present study. 143 (57.2%) were male and 107 (42.8%) were female. Heat 248 (99.2%), redness 246 (98.4%) and localized swelling 240 (96%) were the commonest clinical signs present. The other signs present were localized tenderness 209 (83.6%), purulent drainage 177 (70.8%), fever 170 (68%) and abscess 74 (29.6%) of cases. CRP was positive in 38 (15.2%) cases and negative in majority, i.e., 212 (84.8%) of the cases. The blood culture was positive in only 32 (12.8%) cases whereas in remaining 218 (87.2%) cases it was negative. Pus culture was positive in 145 (58%) cases and there was no growth in 105 (42%) samples. In one case (0.4%) acid fast bacilli were seen. Out of 152 infections in the cases of SSTIs in present study, 74 (48.68%) were gram positive and 78 (51.31%) were gram negative bacteria. Polymicrobial infection was noted in 4 cases. Out of 152 bacterial isolates, 59 (38.81%) were Staphylococcus aureus, 25 (16.44%) were Escherichia coli, 14 (9.21%) were Enterobacter spp. and 13 (8.55%) were Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Of the 74 gram positive organisms, 59 (79.72%) were Staphylococcus aureus, 5 (6.75%) were Streptococcus spp., 6 (8.13%) were Micrococci, 3 (4.05%) were Diphtheroids and one (1.35%) was Enterococcus spp. Among 59 Staphylococcus aureus isolates, 33 (55.93%) were found to be methicillin resistant and 26 (44.06%) were methicillin sensitive.Conclusion: In present study the main pathogens involved in these infections are Staphylococcus aureus and gram negative enteric organisms.

Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, gram negative enteric organisms, MRSA, SSTIs

 

INTRODUCTION

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), most commonly cellulitis or cutaneous abscess, are one of the most common infections encountered in the pediatric age group, especially in the developing world.1,2 SSTIs can be defined as an inflammatory microbial invasion of the epidermis, dermis and subcutaneous tissues.3 It can be classified as ‘superficial’ (epidermis and dermis) and ‘deep’ (hypodermis, fascia and muscle).4 Bacterial skin and skin structure infections commonly encountered in children include impetigo, folliculitis, furunculosis, carbuncles, wound infections, abscesses, cellulitis, erysipelas, and staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome. These infections in infants occur when skin integrity is compromised as a result of change in bacterial load on the skin, the availability of bacterial nutrients, excessive skin moisture due to daily oil massage. Poor hygiene, physical contacts and crowded conditions in day care centers facilitate the spread of contagious infections such as furuncles, carbuncles, and impetigo.2 Colonization with Staphylococcus aureus in the anterior nares and Streptococcus pyogenes on the skin increases the risk of skin infections. Skin-to-skin contact from attendance at day care is a risk factor for community-acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) skin infections. Risk factors for health care–associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(HA-MRSA) skin infections include recent exposure to antibiotics or the health care system.5 If diagnosed early and treated appropriately, these infections are almost always curable, but some have the potential to cause serious complications such as septicemia, nephritis, carditis and arthritis if diagnosis is delayed and/or treatment is inadequate. Therefore, this study was undertaken to study microbial spectrum in skin and soft tissue infections in infants at tertiary health care center

              

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Present prospective study was undertaken at Lokmanya Tilak municipal Medical College Sion Mumbai, over a period of 1 year 6 months. Study was approved by institutional ethical committee.

Inclusion Criteria

  • Children less than one year of age with clinical features suggestive of skin and soft tissue infection.

Exclusion Criteria

  • The participant may not enter the trial if hospital Acquired Infections occurring after 48 hours of admission.

Study was explained to parents and a written informed consent was taken for participation. Diagnosis of skin and soft tissue infection was made on the basis of following clinical features - local signs of redness, warmth, swelling, pain with or without dysfunction, with presence of bullae, haemorrhage, rapidly progressive in nature, crepitus.

Pus or exudate was collected from the depth of the lesion by either aspiration or using at least two sterile cotton swabs after cleaning the wound with sterile normal saline and surrounding skin with alcohol. Care was taken not to touch the adjacent skin margins. Then the swabs were transported in sterile cotton plugged test tubes.

After reaching the laboratory the swab was inoculated on Blood agar, and MacConkey agar plates and these plates were incubated aerobically at 37 for 24-48 hours. After 24 hrs. of incubation, plates were examined for any growth and plates showing no growth were incubated further for next 24 hrs. The plates are discarded if there was no growth after 48 hrs. From the plates showing growth, secondary smears were prepared and biochemical tests were put up for identification. All the aerobic bacteria were identified by Gram stain morphology, cultural characteristics, pigment production, haemolysis on blood agar, motility and conventional biochemical tests for aerobic bacteria as per standard guidelines For lactose fermenting and non-lactose fermenting colonies, further Hanging drop for motility and catalase and oxidase tests were done. After which the following biochemical tests were performed. Indole test, Methyl Red test, Voges Proskauer test, Citrate utilisation test, Urease hydrolysis test, Nitrate reduction test, Phenylalanine deaminase test, Triple sugar iron agar test, Hugh-Leifson oxidation fermentation test, Sugar fermentation tests. For gram-positive cocci catalase test was done first. For catalase positive cocci Slide and tube coagulase tests, Mannitol fermentation test, Hugh-Leifson oxidation fermentation test, Furazolidone sensitivity tests, Phosphatase test were done. For gram positive cocci in pairs, short chains and catalase negative bacilli, tests such as growth at 450c, growth in 6.5% NaCl, bile esculin hydrolysis, bacitracin sensitivity, optochin sensitivity were done. The blood that was sent in brain heart infusion broth was incubated at 37oC for 24 hours. Subculture was done on Blood agar and MacConkey’s agar after 24 hours incubation. These plates were incubated at 37oC for 24 hours. If no growth, subculture was repeated for 5 days Identification of isolates was done by cultural characteristics and standard biochemical tests. The isolates were subjected for antibiotic susceptibility testing by employing Kirby Bauer disc diffusion technique as recommended by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Patients were observed till discharge from the hospital in case admitted for the procedure for removal of pus. Data was entered into Microsoft excel data sheet and was analyzed using SPSS 22 version software. Categorical data was represented in the form of Frequencies and proportions. Chi-square test or Fischer’s exact test was used as test of significance for qualitative data, p value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.


 

 

 

RESULTS

A total of 250 children were included in the present study. 143 (57.2%) were male and 107 (42.8%) were female. Heat 248 (99.2%), redness 246 (98.4%) and localized swelling 240 (96%) were the commonest clinical signs present. The other signs present were localized tenderness 209 (83.6%), purulent drainage 177 (70.8%), fever 170 (68%) and abscess 74 (29.6%) of cases.

Table 1: General characteristics

Characteristics

No. of cases

Percentage

Sex

 

 

Male

143

57.2

Female

107

42.8

Clinical signs

 

 

Heat

248

99.2

Redness

246

98.4

Localized swelling

240

96

Localized tenderness

209

83.6

Purulent discharge

177

70.8

Fever

170

68

Abscess

74

29.6

Routine laboratory investigations were done in all cases of SSTIs to predict the risk of development of fulminant soft tissue infection. It was found that all laboratory values were within normal ranges and none of the patient had a risk of development of life threatening infection. CRP was positive in 38 (15.2%) cases and negative in majority, i.e., 212 (84.8%) of the cases. The blood culture was positive in only 32 (12.8%) cases whereas in remaining 218 (87.2%) cases it was negative. Pus culture was positive in 145 (58%) cases and there was no growth in 105 (42%) samples. In one case (0.4%) acid fast bacilli were seen. Out of 152 infections in the cases of SSTIs in present study, 74 (48.68%) were gram positive and 78 (51.31%) were gram negative bacteria. Polymicrobial infection was noted in 4 cases.

 

Table 2: Laboratory reports

Laboratory signs

Mean ± SD

 

Hb (gm/dl)

10.86 ± 0.86

 

TLC (per mm3)

6404.24 ± 1133.47

 

Platelet count (per ml)

249500 ± 79661.8

 

BSL (mg/dl)

81.54 ± 9.97

 

Serum Sodium (mEq/L)

139 ± 0.86

 

Serum potassium (mEq/L)

4.01 ± 0.20

 

Total protein (g/dl)

4.78 ± 0.31

 

Albumin (g/dl)

3.04 ± 0.21

 

Globulin (g/dl)

1.71 ± 0.30

 

A/G ratio

1.64 ± 0.29

 

CRP - Positive

38

15.2

Blood culture Positive

32

12.8

Pus culture Positive

145

58

AFB positive

1

0.4

Gram reaction

Frequency

Percentage

Gram positive

74

48.68

Gram negative

78

51.31

The three cases with history of animal bites showed growth of gram positive organisms in two cases and gram negative in one case. Trauma cases (n=199) showed growth of gram positive organisms in 56 cases and gram negative in 60 cases, 83 cases showed no growth on culture media. Out of 48 cases with history of body piercing, 22 were sterile, 11 showed growth of gram positive and 14 showed growth of gram negative organisms. Majority of the cases had history of daily massage with oils (n=237), of that 101 were sterile and 67 and 68 cases showed growth of gram positive and negative organisms respectively. Cases with history of previous hospitalization (n=35) showed growth of gram positive and negative organisms in seven and eight cases respectively.

 

 

 

 

 

Table 3: Distribution of risk factors and growth on culture media

Risk factors

No growth

Gram positive

Gram negative

Daily massage with oils

101

67

68

Trauma

83

56

60

Body piercing

22

11

14

Previous hospitalization

19

07

08

Animal bites

00

02

01

Chi Square=12.24; df=12; p>0.05; Not significant

Out of 152 bacterial isolates, 59 (38.81%) were Staphylococcus aureus, 25 (16.44%) were Escherichia coli, 14 (9.21%) were Enterobacter spp. and 13 (8.55%) were Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Of the 74 gram positive organisms, 59 (79.72%) were Staphylococcus aureus, 5 (6.75%) were Streptococcus spp., 6 (8.13%) were Micrococci, 3 (4.05%) were Diphtheroids and one (1.35%) was Enterococcus spp. Among 59 Staphylococcus aureus isolates, 33 (55.93%) were found to be methicillin resistant and 26 (44.06%) were methicillin sensitive. Among all the gram negative organisms (n=78) isolated, Escherichia coli were the commonest (32.05%) followed by Enterobacter spp. (17.94%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16.66%), Klebsiella pneumoniae. and Acinetobacter spp. (14.10% each) and Citrobacter spp., Proteus mirabilis and Serratia spp. (1.28% each). The Micrococci and Diphtheroids were considered as commensals and not processed further.

 

Table 5: Frequency of Microorganisms isolated

Organisms

Frequency

Percentage

Gram positive (n=74)

Staphylococcus aureus

59

79.72

MRSA

33

55.93

MSSA

26

44.06

Streptococcus spp.

05

6.75

Enterococcus spp.

01

1.35

Micrococcus

06

8.13

Diphtheroids

03

4.05

Gram negative (n=78)

Escherichia coli

25

32.05

Enterobacter spp.

14

17.94

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

13

16.66

Klebsiella pneumoniae.

11

14.10

Acinetobacter spp.

11

14.10

Citrobacter spp.

01

1.28

Proteus mirabilis

01

1.28

Serratia spp.

01

1.28

Mixed growth

04

5.12

 


DISCUSSION

The skin has an extremely diverse ecology of organisms that may produce infection. Microbial invasion of skin and underlying soft tissues leads to SSTIs. The clinical manifestations of SSTIs could be due to microbial invasion or an interaction of bacteria with host defense mechanisms. SSTIs are suppurative microbial invasions of the epidermis, dermis and subcutaneous tissues characterized by induration, erythema, warmth, and pain or tenderness. Local manifestations may be accompanied by systemic signs and symptoms, such as fever, chills, malaise and, at times, haemodynamic instability.  Emergency department (ED) visits for skin and soft tissue infections in children have increased dramatically in the last decade.6 Accordingly, from 1997 to 2009, hospital admission for pediatric patients with skin and soft tissue infections increased from 1.9 to 3.4 million annually.7 During that same time, pediatric patients requiring incision and drainage have doubled.7 This growing volume of patients is thought to be largely due to the emergence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). In present study, out of 250 cases, 143 (57.2%) were male and 107 (42.8%) were female. Rani et al.8 found SSTIs more commonly among males (56%) than females. In several other studies conducted by Ghadage DP et al.9 and Andrews RM et al.10 similar pattern of gender distribution was found. In the present study 94.8% cases had history of daily massage with some oils. Topical application of oils has not been shown to reduce the risk of infection or its associated morbidity or mortality, and may increase the risk of infection with coagulase-negative staphylococci in a study by Cleminson et al.11 A wide range of signs and symptoms can be seen in patients with skin and soft tissue infections. Systemic signs include hypotension and associated findings consistent with severe sepsis/septic shock including mental obtundation, cardiovascular and/or pulmonary collapse among other organ system failures. A study by Wall et al.12 compared admission variables between patients with necrotizing soft tissue infections and those with non-necrotizing soft tissue infections. Those patients with either a white blood cell (WBC) count > 15,400 or a serum Na level <135 mmol/L were at higher risk of having a necrotizing soft tissue infections. The model is very sensitive but not very specific with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of only 26%. Clearly it is a valuable tool when negative (rules out necrotizing soft tissue infections) but when it is positive it does not confirm the diagnosis. Out of 156 cases, 152 (97.43%) were monomicrobial and 4 (2.56%) were polymicrobial infections. Among 152 monomicrobial infections, 74 (48.68%) were gram positive and 78 (51.31%) were gram negative bacteria. In a study by Rani et al.8 65 90% cases yielded growth of bacteria, out of which 71.85% were monomicrobial and 28.14% were polymicrobial infections. Of the 152 bacterial isolates in present study, 59 (38.81%) were Staphylococcus aureus, 25 (16.44%) were Escherichia coli, 14 (9.21%) were Enterobacter spp. and 13 (8.55%) were Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mohanty et al.13 reported Staphylococcus aureus(38.05%), Escherichia coli(17.39%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa(11.82%) as the top three isolates in their study. They have reported incidence of Enterobacter spp. as 2.80% in their study. Zargar et al.14 from India and Rennie et al.15 and Sader et al.16 from outside also reported these organisms among top five pathogens isolated from skin and soft tissue infections in hospitalized patients. Staphylococcus aureus is the almost-universal cause of furuncles, carbuncles, and skin abscesses and worldwide is the most commonly identified agent responsible for skin and soft tissue infections. The typical organisms that colonize the skin above the waist are usually Gram-positive species such as Staphylococcus epidermidis, Corynebacterium species, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes. The latter two species are particularly significant because they contribute to a majority of SSTIs. Staphylococcus aureus was the commonest isolate in our study. Many other investigators such as Ghadage et al.,9 Mohanty et al.13 Mathew et al.,17 Baslas et al., 18 Ahmed et al.,19 and Sugeng et al., 20 have similarly found Staphylococcus aureus to be the major isolate in pediatric patients. In present study, resistance to methicillin was detected in 33 (55.93%) of Staphylococcus aureus isolates. MRSA is on the rise in SSTIs in children both in the hospital setup (HA-MRSA) and in the community. Prevalence of MRSA was found to be consistent with studies by Gupta et al.(54.5%),21 Anupurba et al.(54.8%)22 and by Roveta et al.(53%).23 The typical organisms that colonize the skin below the waist are both Gram-positive and Gram-negative species. It is speculated that this difference is secondary to the proximity to the anorectal region. Enteric species, such as Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus species, gravitate to and colonize this area of the skin. Amongst gram negative bacilli, Escherichia coli was the predominant isolate in this study, other studies have also quoted Escherichia coli as the leading organism. 15 Bacterial skin infections are one of the most common causes of childhood morbidity and constitute one of the prime causes of hospital attendance in children. The diagnosis of skin and soft tissue infections is often clinical, and treatments must be tailored to the most likely organisms present in a given population of patients.

 

CONCLUSION

In present study the main pathogens involved in these infections are Staphylococcus aureus and gram negative enteric organisms. Among 59 Staphylococcus aureus isolates, 33 (55.93%) were found to be methicillin resistant and 26 (44.06%) were methicillin sensitive. With knowledge of likely causative organisms causing SSTIs and their sensitivity pattern, the most suitable antibiotic can be started without waiting for the result.

 

REFERENCES

  • Lautz TB, Raval MV, Barsness KA. Increasing national burden of hospitalizations for skin and soft tissue infections in children. J Pediatr Surg 2011;46(10):1935–1941.
  • Frei CR, Makos BR, Daniels KR, Oramasionwu CU. Emergence of community-acquired methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections as a common cause of hospitalization in United States children. J Pediatr Surg 2010;45(10): 1967–1974.
  • Dryden MS. Skin and soft tissue infection: microbiology and epidemiology. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009;33Suppl3:2–7.
  • Ladhani S, Garbash M. Staphylococcal skin infections in children. Rational drug therapy recommendations. Pediatr Drugs 2006;7:77-102.
  • Herman RA, Kee V R, Moores KG, et al. Etiology and treatment of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. A m J Health Syst Pharm 2008;65:219-25.
  • Stevens DL,Bisno AL, Chambers HF, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 59:e10.
  • Lopez MA, Cruz AT, Kowalkowski MA, Raphael JL. Trends in resource utilization for hospitalized children with skin and soft tissue infections. Pediatrics 2013;131:e718-725.
  • Rani SR, Jayalekha B, Sreekumary PK. Bacteriological profile of pyoderma in a tertiary care centre in Kerala, India. Int J Res Dermatol 2016;2:1-11.
  • Ghadage DP, Sali YA. Bacteriological study of pyoderma with special reference to antibiotic susceptibility to newer antibiotics. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 1999;65:177-81.
  • Andrews RM, Kearns T, Connors C, Parker C, Carville KA. Regional initiative to reduce skin infections amongst aboriginal children living in remote communities of the Northern Territory, Australia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2009;3(11):e554.
  • Cleminson J, McGuire W. Topical emollient for preventing infection in preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD001150.
  • Wall DB, Klein SR, et al. A simple model to help distinguish necrotizing fasciitis from non-necrotizing soft tissue infection. J Am CollSurg 2000;191: 227-31.
  • Mohanty S, Kapil A, Dhawan B, Das BK. Bacterilogical and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of soft tissue infections from northern India. Indian J Med Sci 2004;58:10-15.
  • Zargar AH, Masoodi SR, Laway BA, Wani AL, Bashir MI. Ciprofloxacin in the management of soft tissue infections in diabetes mellitus. J Assoc Phys India 2000;48:757-8.
  • Rennie RP, Jones RN, Mutnick AH, and the SENTRY Program Study Group (North America). Occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of pathogens isolated from skin and soft tissue infections: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (United States and Canada, 2000) Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2003;45:287-93.
  • Sader HS, Jones RN, Silva JB. Skin and soft tissue infections in Latin American medical centers: four-year assessment of the pathogen frequency and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2002; 44: 281-8.
  • Mathews SM, Garg BR, Kanungo R. A clinico- bacteriological study of primary pyodermas in children in Pondicherry. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1992;58:183-7.
  • Baslas RG, Arora SK, Mukhija RD, Mohan L, Singh UK. Organisms causing pyoderma and their susceptibility patterns. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 1990;127-9.
  • Ahmed K, Batra A, Roy R, Kalla G, Kh. Clinical and bacteriological study of pyoderma in Jodhpur- Western Rajasthan. Indian J Dermatol Venerol Leprol 1998;64(3):156-7.
  • Sugeng MW, Ang P, Tan HH, Goh CL. Characteristics of bacterial skin infections in children compared to adults at a tertiary dermatologic center. Int J Dermatol 1999;38:582-6.
  • Gupta M, Singh NP, Kumar A, Kaur IR. Cefoxitin disk diffusion test - Better predictor of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Indian J Med Microbiol 2009;27:379-80.
  • Anupurba S, Sen MR, Nath G, Sharma BM, Gulati AK, Mohapatra TM. Prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary referral hospital in Eastern Uttar Pradesh. Ind J Med Microbiol 2003;21(1):49-51.
  • Roveta S, Tonoli E, Marchese A, Schito GC. Epidemiology of methicillin resistance among staphylococcal strains isolated in risk units and effects of the vancomycin on the expression of methicillin resistance. Infect med 2001;9(2):82-89.
























 








 




 








 

 









Policy for Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology (Print ISSN:2579-0900) (Online ISSN: 2636-4654) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.