Home About Us Contact Us
`

 

Table of Content - Volume 18 Issue 3- June 2021


 

Microbiological study of blood stream infections among patients admitted to critical care units at a tertiary hospital

 

Rajeshwari K G

 

Consultant Microbiologist, Aster CMI Hospital, Sahakaranagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, INDIA.

Email: kg.rajeshwari@gmail.com

 

Abstract              Background: Patients hospitalized in Intensive Care Unit (ICUs) are at particularly high risk of blood stream infections (BSIs) because of their debilitated condition as a result of underlying disease and frequent invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. In present study, we aimed to analyse various organisms causing BSI and their prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern in patients admitted to critical care units at our tertiary hospital. Material and Methods: Present study was prospective, descriptive study, conducted in patients >18 years old, admitted to critical care units, diagnosed with Blood stream infection. Results: A total of 459 blood samples were received in the microbiology lab for culture out of which 54 samples (11.7%) showed culture positivity in suspected patients with BSIs. Mean age was 50.45 ± 11.45 years, male (59.3 %) outnumbered female (40.7 %) patients. Most of patients were from medical ICUs (64.8 %) as compares to Surgical ICUs (35.2 %). Most of patients were on ventilatory support (75.9 %), with central catheter (85.2 %), Endotracheal tubes (75.9 %). Diabetes (38.9 %), Renal disease (27.8 %) and Cardiac disease (25.9 %) were common underlying comorbid conditions noticed. Single micro-organism was isolated in 72.2% patients’ blood sample. Mortality was noted in 42.6 % patients. In present study Gram‑negative (68.5 %) organisms were more common than Gram‑positive (51.9 %) organisms and Fungi (7.4 %). Among Gram‑negative organisms Klebsiella pneumoniae (20.4 %) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.5 %) were common and others were Escherichia coli (16.7 %), Acinetobacter spp. (9.3 %) and Enterobacter spp. (3.7 %). In Gram‑positive organisms Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (20.4 %), MRSA (9.3 %) and MSSA (7.4 %) were common and others were Enterococcus spp. (5.6 %), Staphylococcus epidermidis (5.6 %) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (3.7 %). Fungi such as Candida spp (5.6 %) and Aspergillus (1.9 %) were also noted. Vancomycin (100.0 %), Linezolid (100.0 %) and Amikacin (100.0 %) were most sensitive antibiotics for Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, other antibiotics were Clindamycin (63.6 %), Cefoxitin (63.6 %) and Ciprofloxacin (54.5 %), Imipenem (100.0 %) was most sensitive antibiotics for Klebsiella, other sensitive antibiotics were Piperacillin/tazobactam (81.8 %), Amikacin (72.7 %) and Cefoperazone/sulbactam (63.6 %). Conclusion: Bloodstream infection is a life-threatening challenge; hence, timely detection, identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of blood-borne pathogens is mandatory to reduce mortality and morbidity in patients admitted to critical care units.

Keywords: Bloodstream infection, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, critical care units. antimicrobial resistance

 

Patients hospitalized in Intensive Care Unit (ICUs) are at particularly high risk of blood stream infections (BSIs) because of their debilitated condition as a result of underlying disease and frequent invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.1,2 Approximately 7% of all patients within the first month of hospitalization in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) are diagnosed with BSIs annually.3 The case fatality rate associated with BSI reaches 35-50% when associated with admission to ICU.3The changing epidemiology and susceptibility patterns of microorganisms in India threaten the effectiveness of most, if not all; antibiotics frequently used to prevent and treat bacterial infections.4 Many bacterial pathogens have developed resistance to most of the antibiotics and are creating a serious health crisis with many economic and social inferences all over the worlds. High incidence of multidrug-resistant bacteria leads to increased stay in hospital, rise in financial burden on the patient, and in many instances, loss of life.5 The excessive and irrational use of antibiotics has led to an increase in the multidrug-resistant bugs and thus worsened the condition. Bloodstream infections have serious consequences like shock, disseminated intravascular coagulation, multiple organ failure, and even death. The detection of microorganisms in a patient’s blood has great diagnostic and prognostic significance.6 Blood culture provides essential information for the evaluation of a variety of diseases like endocarditis, pneumonia, and pyrexia of unknown origin particularly, in patients with suspected sepsis. In present study, we aimed to analyse various organisms causing BSI and their prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern in patients admitted to critical care units at our tertiary hospital.

              

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Present study was prospective, descriptive study, conducted in department of Microbiology, at a tertiary care hospital, Bengaluru, India. Study period was from January 2020 to December 2020. Study was approved by institutional ethical committee.

Inclusion criteria –

Patients >18 years old, admitted to critical care units, diagnosed with Blood stream infection.

Blood stream infection was labelled if patient has a recognized pathogen cultured from one or more blood cultures and the organism cultured from blood is not related to an infection at another site OR at least one of the Common skin contaminant (e.g., Bacillus sp., micrococci, Coagulase-negative staphylococci or Diphtheroid ) is isolated from two or more blood cultures collection on separate occasions. Blood culture Specimen samples were aseptically collected and transferred to the laboratory, cultured in fresh Nutrient Agar Media plates and were incubated within 24 hours of their collection. After incubating for 24 hours at 37°C, cultures were stored at 2-8°C for further examinations. Blood from the positive blood culture bottles was subjected to subculture on 5% sheep blood agar and MacConkey agar. The growth on culture plates was identified on the basis of colony morphology, Gram stain, and various biochemical tests. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed for all blood cultures isolated on Muller Hinton agar by Kirby- Bauer disc diffusion method as recommended in the CLSI (Clinical And Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines) 2019. All the isolates were identified on the basis of culture characteristics, Gram stain and biochemical reactions. Selective media were used. Such as, MacConkey Agar was used to identify the organisms such as Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and others. The isolates were then subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing. on Muller Hinton agar medium by disk diffusion technique according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). Data was collected in Microsoft excel sheet and statistical analysis was done using descriptive statistics.

 

RESULTS

A total of 459 blood samples were received in the microbiology lab for culture out of which 54 samples (11.7%) showed culture positivity in suspected patients with BSIs. Mean age was 50.45 ± 11.45 years, male (59.3 %) outnumbered female (40.7 %) patients. Most of patients were from medical ICUs (64.8 %) as compares to Surgical ICUs (35.2 %). Most of patients were on ventilatory support (75.9 %), with central catheter (85.2 %), Endotracheal tubes (75.9 %). Diabetes (38.9 %), Renal disease (27.8 %) and Cardiac disease (25.9 %) were common underlying comorbid conditions noticed. Single micro-organism was isolated in 72.2% patients’ blood sample. Mortality was noted in 42.6 % patients.


 

Table 1: General characteristics

Parameters

Number of patients (N = 54)

Percentage

Mean age (years)

50.45 ± 11.45

Gender

Male

32

59.3

Female

22

40.7

Location

0.0

Surgical ICUs

19

35.2

Medical ICUs

35

64.8

Severity score

0.0

On ventilatory support

41

75.9

On oxygen therapy

13

24.1

Presence of indwelling device

0.0

Urinary catheter

53

98.1

Central catheter

46

85.2

Endotracheal tubes

41

75.9

Dialysis line

11

20.4

Presenting complaints

0.0

Breathlessness

17

31.5

Fever

35

64.8

Cough

13

24.1

Underlying comorbid conditions

0.0

Diabetes

21

38.9

Renal disease

15

27.8

Cardiac disease

14

25.9

Hypertension

11

20.4

Lung disease

9

16.7

Liver disease

8

14.8

On dialysis

6

11.1

Malignancy

4

7.4

Final clinical outcome

0.0

Discharged (stable)

31

57.4

Deceased

23

42.6

Micro-organisms isolated

 

 

Single

39

72.2

Multiple

15

27.8

In present study Gram‑negative (68.5 %) organisms were more common than Gram‑positive (51.9 %) organisms and Fungi (7.4 %). Among Gram‑negative organisms Klebsiella pneumoniae (20.4 %) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.5 %) were common and others were Escherichia coli (16.7 %), Acinetobacter spp. (9.3 %) and Enterobacter spp. (3.7 %). In Gram‑positive organisms Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (20.4 %), MRSA (9.3 %) and MSSA (7.4 %) were common and others were Enterococcus spp. (5.6 %), Staphylococcus epidermidis (5.6 %) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (3.7 %). Fungi such as Candida spp (5.6 %) and Aspergillus (1.9 %) were also noted.

 

Table 2: Microorganisms isolated

Microorganism

Number of patients (N = 54)

Percentage

Gram‑positive

28

51.9

Coagulase-negative Staphylococci

11

20.4

MRSA

5

9.3

MSSA

4

7.4

Enterococcus spp.

3

5.6

Staphylococcus epidermidis

3

5.6

Streptococcus pneumoniae

2

3.7

Gram‑negative

37

68.5

Klebsiella pneumoniae

11

20.4

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

10

18.5

Escherichia coli

9

16.7

Acinetobacter spp.

5

9.3

Enterobacter spp.

2

3.7

Fungi

4

7.4

Candida spp.

3

5.6

Aspergillus

1

1.9

(MRSA-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus;  MSSA -methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus)

Vancomycin (100.0 %), Linezolid (100.0 %) and Amikacin (100.0 %) were most sensitive antibiotics for Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, other antibiotics were Clindamycin (63.6 %), Cefoxitin (63.6 %) and Ciprofloxacin (54.5 %),

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 3: Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus.

Antibiotics

Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species (n = 11)

Percentage

Vancomycin

11

100.0

Linezolid

11

100.0

Amikacin

11

100.0

Clindamycin

7

63.6

Cefoxitin

7

63.6

Ciprofloxacin

6

54.5

Penicillin G

0

0.0

Erythromycin

0

0.0

Imipenem (100.0 %) was most sensitive antibiotics for Klebsiella, other sensitive antibiotics were Piperacillin/tazobactam (81.8 %), Amikacin (72.7 %) and Cefoperazone/sulbactam (63.6 %).

 

Table 4: Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Klebsiella.

Antibiotic Citrobacter (n = 2)

Klebsiella (n = 11)

Percentage

Imipenem

11

100.0

Piperacillin/tazobactam

9

81.8

Amikacin

8

72.7

Cefoperazone/sulbactam

7

63.6

Ciprofloxacin

3

27.3

Ceftriaxone

3

27.3

Gentamycin

3

27.3

Cefepime

2

18.2

Chloramphenicol

0

0.0

Ampicillin

0

0.0

 


DISCUSSION

The intensive care units (ICUs) are often called “the hubs” of infections. Extremely vulnerable population group with reduced host defenses and dysregulated immune responses, multiple procedures, and use of invasive devices such as endotracheal intubation, central venous cannulations, mechanical ventilation (MV), and urinary catheterizations distorting the anatomical integrityprotective barriers of patients are the important reasons.7,8 Central Venous Catheter (CVC) related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) are a major cause of morbidity, mortality and increased cost with prolongation of hospital stay Blood culture remains the highly specific indicator of bacteremia and antimicrobial susceptibility test assist a great deal in precise identification of the most appropriate choice of drug to be administer. Sepsis and septic shock occur at all ages but most often in elderly patients. At present, most sepsis episodes are observed in patients older than 60 years. Advanced age is a risk factor for acquiring nosocomial blood stream infection in the development of severe forms of sepsis.9 As per previous studies, common types of bacteria causing bloodstream infections are Gram-positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS), Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Enterococcus faecium and Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella species.10,11Ullas Bhabhor et al.,12 noted that 27.90% samples had positive growth in culture. The incidence of blood stream infection due to gram positive organism was (51.28%). Among them Staphylococcus aureus 72 (45.56%) was most common organism. Gram negative organism were quite low (48.73%) among them Klebsiella spp. (16.45%) was most common. The antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of isolated organisms showed high resistance to routinely used antimicrobial agents. Similar findings were noted in present study. Singh AA et al., 13 showed the preponderance of Gramnegative organisms and the frequently isolated Bacteria were P. aeruginosa (38.17%), K. pneumoniae (23.76%), followed by Acinetobacter anitratus (14.96%), Enterobacter (6%), and E. coli (6%). Grampositive organisms (S. aureus 2%, coagulase negative staphylococci [CoNS] 2%, Enterococcus 0.6%) constituted a small fraction. In study by Mohd Suhail Lone et al.,14 frequencies of Gram-positive and Gram negative bacteria were 16.83% with yeast recovered in 5.78% of the specimens. Acinetobacter spp and K. pneumoniae were the most common Gram-negative bacteria and S. aureus the most common Gram-positive one. High level resistance to all the antimicrobials was seen; with Acinetobacter spp being the most multidrug resistant GNB isolated in the ICU setting. ESBL production was highest in K. pneumoniae isolates (77.1%). Also 49.6% of Acinetobacter isolates were found to be MBL producers. Methicillin resistance was seen in 95% of S. aureus and 91% of coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) isolates with vancomycin resistance seen in 46% of enterococcal isolates. In another study by Mariyah Yousuf., et al.15 from organisms causing BSI, 54% were Gram-negative and 45% were Gram-positive. Among gram positive bacteria Coagulase negative Staphylococcus (CONS) was isolated in most samples (69%) than Staphylococcus aureus (15.6%). Among Gram negative bacilli Pseudomonas aeruginosa accounted for 37% of these. Candida bloodstream infections (BSI) have become a major problem in tertiary-care hospitals worldwide. Candidemia has been observed particularly among patients hospitalized for long periods, who have been exposed to antibiotics, immunosuppressive therapy, parenteral nutrition, and multiple invasive medical procedures.16,17 The insufficient antibiotic-prescribing practices, especially the unnecessary use of broad-spectrum antibiotics together with the insufficient hospital infection prevention programme, are considered to be the cause of both a high antimicrobial resistance rate and an increased incidence of BSI. Every hospital must recognize the epidemiology of its microorganisms to recommend initial appropriate presumptive antimicrobial therapy. The application of hospital-wide antibiograms to guide clinicians in the initial choice of antimicrobials is the usual approach adopted.

 

CONCLUSION

Bloodstream infection is a life-threatening challenge; hence, timely detection, identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of blood-borne pathogens is mandatory to reduce mortality and morbidity in patients admitted to critical care units. Formulation and strict implementation of hospital antibiotic policy is must to control the menacing rise in antimicrobial resistance

 

REFERENCES

  1. Biedenbach DJ, Moet GJ, Jones RN. Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance pattern comparisons among bloodstream infection isolates from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997–2002). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2004; 50: 59–69.
  2. Warren DK, Zack JE, Elward AM, Cox MJ, Fraser VJ. Nosocomial primary bloodstream infections in intensive care unit patients in a nonteaching community medical center: a 21-month prospective study. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33: 1329–1335.
  3. Ammerlaan H., et al. “Secular trends in nosocomial bloodstream infections: antibiotic-resistant bacteria increase the total burden of infection”. Clinical Infectious Diseases 56.6 (2013): 798-805.
  4. Gohel K, Jojera A, Soni S, Gang S, Sabnis R, Desai M. Bacteriological profile and drug resistance patterns of blood culture isolates in a tertiary care nephrourology teaching institute. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:153747.
  5. Bharadwaj R, Bal A, Kapila K, Mave V, Gupta A. Blood stream infections. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:515273.
  6. Bhatta Dharm Raj, Abhishek Gaur, H. S. Supram. Bacteriological profile of blood stream infections among febrile patients attending a tertiary care centre of Western Nepal. Asian J Med Sci. 2013;4(3):92-8.
  7. John TJ, Dandona L, Sharma VP, Kakkar M. Continuing challenge of infectious diseases in India. Lancet 2011;377:25269.
  8. Marwick C, Davey P. Care bundles: The holy grail of infectious risk management in hospital? Curr Opin Infect Dis 2009;22:3649.
  9. BettyA, Daniel F,Alice S. Bailey and Scotts Diagnostic Microbiology, International edition ,ed 12,2007, Mosby Elsevier, Chapter 52:778-797.
  10. H. Bhabhor, U. Bhabhor, H. Shingala, and M. Sinha, “Bacteriological study of blood stream infection (BSI) in ICU patients,” Indian Journal of Microbiology Research, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 368–373, 2018.
  11. S. Khurana, N. Bhardwaj, M. Kumari, R. Malhotra, and P. Mathur, “Prevalence, etiology, and antibiotic resistance profiles of bacterial bloodstream infections in Northern India: a 4-year study,” Journal of Laboratory Physicians, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 426–431, 2018.
  12. Ullas Bhabhor et al. Bacteriological study of blood stream infection (BSI) in ICU patients, Indian Journal of Microbiology Research, July-September, 2018;5(3):368-373 369
  13. Singh AA, Kaur M, Singh A, Goel S, Surana A, Bhardwaj A, et al. Prevalence of microbial infection and strategic pattern of antimicrobial resistance among intensive care unit patients in a tertiary care teaching hospital from rural Northern India. IAIM 2015;2:1420.
  14. Mohd Suhail Lone, Junaid Ahmad, Dalip K. Kakru, Lubna Samad, Shagufta Roohi, Abiroo Naqash,, Blood Stream Infections in Intensive Care Units. A Study from North India, Journal of Microbiology and Related Research , Volume 2 Number 1, January - June 2016.
  15. Mariyah Yousuf., et al. “Blood Stream Infections in Intensive Care Units and its Antibiogram". Acta Scientific Microbiology 3.6 (2020): 158-163.
  16. Almirante B, Rodriguez D, Park BJ, Cuenca-Estrella M, Planes AM, Almela M,Mensa J, et al. Epidemiology and predictors of mortality in cases of Candidablood stream infection: results from population-based surveillance, Barcelona, Spain, from 2002 to 2003. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43:1829–1835.
  17. Colombo AL, Nucci M, Park BJ, Simone A, Warnock D, Nouer SA, et al. Epidemiology of candidemia in Brazil: a nationwide sentinel surveillance of candidemia in eleven medical centres. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44:2816–2823.




























 








 




 








 

 









Policy for Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology (Print ISSN:2579-0900) (Online ISSN: 2636-4654) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.