Home About Us Contact Us

 

Table of Content - Volume 19 Issue 1 - July 2021


 

Study of clinical management and outcome of gastric cancer patients at a tertiary care hospital

 

Anil Degaonkar1, Sachin H M2*

 

1Associate Professor, 2Junior Resident, Department of General Surgery, Dr Shankarrao Chavan Government Medical College, Vishnupuri, Nanded, INDIA.

Email: sachinhm33@gmail.com, degoankar@yahoo.co.in

 

Abstract              Background: Gastric Cancer is the second most common cancer worldwide surpassed only by lung cancer as the leading cause of cancer deaths. Early disease has minimal, non-specific or no symptoms. Therefore prognosis for gastric cancer patients remain poor as most patients are diagnosed in advanced stages. Present study was thus undertaken to study various etiological risk factors, clinical presentations and associated complications in cases of Carcinoma stomach. Material and Methods: Present study was a hospital based prospective observational study conducted in diagnosed cases of gastric carcinoma underwent surgery at our tertiary hospital. Results: In present study total 25 patients were studied. Majority of the study participants were in the age group of 61-65 years (40 %), and male (64%) were more than female (36%), male: female ratio was 1.8:1. There was no statistical association between TNM staging and outcome (p=0.4401). 36 % of the study subjects were found to have tumour in the body of stomach and underwent subtotal gastrectomy. Whereas 64 % of the participant had tumour in the pylorus and underwent distal gastrectomy and palliative gastro jejunostomy. There is no statistical association between type of surgery and outcome. 16% of the total study participants developed ARDS. The most common complication encountered was pneumonia in 20% of the subjects. 44 % did not develop any complications after surgery. Significant statistical association between complications and outcome (p=0.003). 100% of the participants who underwent distal gastrectomy had ICU stay less than 10 days, 45.45% of the participants who underwent palliative gastro jejunostomy and 44.44% of the subjects who underwent sub-total gastrectomy had ICU stay less than 10 days. Conclusion: 36% had tumor in the body of stomach and underwent subtotal gastrectomy, 64% had tumor in the pylorus and underwent distal gastrectomy and palliative gastro jejunostomy. Highly significant statistical association was noted between ICU stay/ complications and outcome of surgery.

Keywords: Gastric Cancer, TNM staging, gastrectomy, gastro-jejunostomy

 

NTRODUCTION

Gastric Cancer is the second most common cancer worldwide surpassed only by lung cancer as the leading cause of cancer deaths.1 Early disease has minimal, non-specific or no symptoms. Therefore prognosis for gastric cancer patients remain poor as most patients are diagnosed in advanced stages. Gastric cancer occurs a decade is four times higher in among South Indians compared with the North Indians.2 Among the six registries, the highest incidence in both sexes is reported from Chennai and the lowest from Barshi. ln India more than 90% of all gastric cancers are diagnosed in an advanced stage, and in those subjected to surgery more than 70% have serosal infiltration.3 Factors associated with increased risk for developing stomach cancer4 are nutritional (low fat or protein consumption, salted meat or fish, high nitrate consumption, high complex-carbohydrate consumption), environmental (poor food preparation, smoked/salted food, lack of refrigeration, poor drinking water/well water, smoking), medical (prior gastric surgery, Helicobacter pylori infection, gastric atrophy and gastritis, adenomatous polyps, male gender). Gastric adenocarcinoma lacks specific symptoms early in the course of the disease. Patients often ignore early vague epigastric discomfort and indigestion; epigastric pain is similar to pain caused by benign ulcers and similarly may mimic angina. Typically, however, the pain is constant, nonradiating, and unrelieved by food ingestion. More advanced disease may present with weight loss, anorexia, fatigue, or vomiting. Physical signs develop late in the course of the disease and are most commonly associated with locally advanced or metastatic disease.2 The present study was thus undertaken to study various etiological risk factors, clinical presentations and associated complications in cases of gastric carcinoma.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Present study was a hospital based prospective observational study was carried out on 25 patients of Surgical outcome of Gastric Carcinoma in Surgical Wards. Study was conducted over a period of Jan 2019 to June 2020 (18 months). Study was approved by institutional ethical committee.

Inclusion Criteria:

Diagnosed cases of Carcinoma of stomach, underwent surgery at our hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with serious comorbidities
    1. cardiac insufficiency
    2. Advanced pulmonary disease
    3. Pronounced renal failure
  2. Distant metastasis(stage 4)
  3. Evidence of local extension beyond the point of Resectibility

Verbal informed consent was obtained from all the patients or their relatives as applicable. Initial work up included, clinical examination, hematological and biochemical parameters, barium studies, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, endoscopic biopsy and computerized tomography. All deserving patients were explored with the basic intent of resection, even as a palliative measure. Patients however, found unresectable were subjected to palliative by pass. Following surgery, histopathological examination of resected specimens, tumor morphology, differentiation, clearance of cut margins and level and status of lymph nodes studied. For post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy patients were referred to Oncology center. Patients were followed up till the time of discharge from hospital. Post-operative complication during the hospital stay were recorded. Statistical analysis was done by descriptive statistics. Chi square test was applied for qualitative type if data and t test for quantitative type of data for statistical analysis. All analysis was carried out by using SPSS software version 21. p <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 

RESULTS

In present study total 25 patients were studied. Majority of the study participants were in the age group of 61-65 years (40 %) followed by participants in the age group of 56-60 years (20%) and 66-70years and 51-55 years(16 %), least number of participants were in the age group of >70 years (8%). There is no statistical association between age and outcome (p=0.607)

 

Table 1: Association between age and outcome

Age in years

Death

Discharge

Total

51-55

0

4

4 (16%)

56-60

2

3

5 (20%)

61-65

4

6

10 (40%)

65-70

1

3

4 (16%)

>70 years

1

1

2 (4%)

Total

8

17

25

Male (64%) were more than female (36%), male: female ratio was 1.8:1.

 

Table 2: Gender distribution

Gender

Frequency

Percent

Female

9

36.00 %

Male

16

64.00 %

Most patients had tumour any stage nodes any stage and mets. There is no statistical association between TNM staging and outcome (p=0.4401).

 

Table 3: TNM staging and outcome

TNM Coding

Death

Discharge

Total

Tumour Any Stage No Nodes No Mets

2

7

9

Tumour Any Stage Nodes Any Stage No Mets

1

4

5

Tumour Any Stage Nodes Any Stage And Mets

5

6

11

Total

8

17

25

36 % of the study subjects were found to have tumour in the body of stomach and underwent subtotal gastrectomy .where as 64 % of the participant had tumour in the pylorus and underwent distal gastrectomy and palliative gastro jejunostomy. 100% of the study participants who underwent distal gastrectomy were discharged .where as 45.45% of the participants with palliative gastro jejunostomy encountered death .and 33.33% of the subjects who underwent subtotal gastrectomy succumbed. There is no statistical association between type of surgery and outcome. (p - 0.19)

 

Table 4: According to the type of surgery and outcome

Type of surgery

Death

Discharge

Total

Distal gastrectomy

0

5 (100%)

5 (100%)

Palliative gastro jejunostomy

5 (45.45%)

6 (54.55%)

11 (100%)

Subtotal gastrectomy

3 (33.33%)

6 (66.67%)

9 (100%)

Total

8 (32 %)

17 (68 %)

25

Most common complication encountered was pneumonia (20%), followed by ARDS (16%) whereas 44 % of the study subjects did not develop any complications after surgery .


 

 

Table 5: Distribution according to the type of surgery and complications

Type Of Surgery

ARDS

Atelectasis

Duodenal Stump Leakage

Pneumonia

No

Total

Distal Gastrectomy

0

0

0

0

5 (100%)

5

(100%)

Palliative Gastro Jejunostomy

4 (36.36%)

1 (9.09%)

0

4 (36.36%)

2 (18.18%)

11

(100%)

Subtotal Gastrectomy

0

1

(11.11%)

3

(33.33%)

1 (11.11%)

4 (44.44%)

9

(100%)

Total

4(16 %)

2 (8 %)

3 (12%)

5 (20%)

11 (44%)

25

There is significant statistical association between complications and outcome (p=0.003).

 

Table 6: Association between complications and outcome

Complications

Death

Discharge

Total

ARDS

4

0

4

Atelectasis

0

2

2

Duodenal stump leakage

3

0

3

No

0

11

11

Pneumonia

1

4

5

Total

8

17

25

100% of the participants who underwent distal gastrectomy had ICU stay less than 10 days .45.45% of the participants who underwent palliative gastro jejunostomy and 44.44% of the subjects who underwent sub-total gastrectomy had ICU stay less than 10 days .

 

Table 7: According to the type of surgery and ICU stay

Type of surgery

<10 days

>10 days

Total

Distal gastrectomy

5 (100%)

0

5 (100%)

Palliative gastro jejunostomy

5 (45.45%)

6 (54.55%)

11 (100%)

Subtotal gastrectomy

4 (44.44%)

5 (55.56%)

9 (100%)

Total

14 (56 %)

11 (44 %)

25

 


DISCUSSION

95% of all malignant gastric neoplasms are adenocarcinomas. Other histologic types include squamous cell carcinoma, adenoacanthoma, carcinoid tumors, Gl stromal tumors, and lymphoma. Physical signs develop late in the course of the disease and are most commonly associated with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Patients present may present with a palpable abdominal mass, a palpable supraclavicular (Virchow) or periumbilical (Sister Mary Joseph's) lymph node, peritoneal metastasis palpable by rectal examination (Blummer's shelf), or a palpable ovarian mass (Krukenberg's tumor).5 As the disease progresses, patients may develop hepatomegaly secondary to metastasis, jaundice, ascites, and cachexia.4In the present study, majority of the study participants were in the age group of 60-65 years (40%) followed by participants in the age group of 56-60 years (20 %) and mean age was 62.24 ± 6.44 years. Dao-Jun Gong et.al.6 conducted a study had total 125 patients, out of which 62(49.60%) patients were below 60 years of age and 63(50.40%) patients were above 60 years of age. These findings were similar to present study. A study by Wei Peng et al.7 2013 was conducted on 133 patients, out of which 105 (78.94%) patients were less than 50 years of age and 28 patients were more than 50 years of age. In the present study, 64 % of the study participants were males and the rest 36 % were female participants. In study by Dao-Jun Gong et.al.6 68.8 % patients were male and remaining 31.2 % patients were females. These findings are similar to present study. The optimal surgical management of gastric cancer must be tailored to the extent and location of disease. In the absence of distant metastatic spread, aggressive surgical resection of the gastric tumour is justified.8 The extent of gastric resection is determined by the need to obtain a resection margin free of microscopic disease. Because gastric tumours are characterized by extensive intramural spread, a line of resection at least 6 cm from the tumour mass is necessary to ensure a low rate of anastomotic recurrence.5 In the present study, 36 % of the study subjects were found to have tumour in the body of stomach and underwent sub-total gastrectomy, where-as 64 % of the participant had tumour in the pylorus and underwent distal gastrectomy and palliative gastro jejunostomy. A study conducted by Dao-Jun Gong et.al. found that, 38.8% patients had tumour at upper site of stomach followed by 30.4% had tumour at lower two third site and 19.20% patients had tumour at middle part of stomach while only 14.40% patients had tumour at lower part of stomach. These findings are quite similar to present study. In study by Wei Peng et al., gastrectomy was done in 66.91% subjects. Site of tumour was not mentioned in this study. In the present study, the most common complication encountered was pneumonia in 20% of the subjects, 16% developed ARDS and 44 % of did not develop any complications after surgery. Dao-Jun Gong et al.6 found following post-operative complications; out of 125 patients, 7 had pulmonary infection, 4 had wound infections, arrhythmia, and pleural effusion. Abdominal abscess, intra-abdominal bleeding, duodenal stump leakage, upper digestive tract bleeding, ascites and fungal infection were present in 3 patients each. Whereas, jejunum stump leakage was present in only 1 patient. Pulmonary embolus, chylous leak and urinary track infection was present in 2 patients each. This study had many post-operative complications than the present study. In study by Ilfet Songun,9 in which 711 patients underwent surgery, local recurrence was 22% in the D1 group versus 12% in D2, and regional recurrence was 19% in D1 versus 13% in D2. Dao-Jun Gong et al.,6 noted overall morbidity in 20.8% patients, mortality in 3.2% (palliative or radical total gastrectomy without combined organ resection) and mean postoperative stay was 18.34 days. Wei Peng et al.7 found that, overall survival of the 133 patients ranged from 2 to 70 months. The median overall survival was 16 months and average overall survival was 20 months. Complete resection of the tumour remains the standard treatment whenever possible. Complete endoscopic resection suffices only in special types of carcinoma that are confined to the gastric mucosa. Depending on the histological findings, either a subtotal distal gastrectomy or a total (perhaps extended total) gastrectomy can be performed.10 In the present study, 100% of the participants who underwent distal gastrectomy had ICU stay less than 10 days .45.45% of the participants who underwent palliative gastro jejunostomy and 44.44% of the subjects who underwent subtotal gastrectomy had ICU stay less than 10 days. A study conducted by Dao-Jun Gong et al.6, mean postoperative stay after surgeries was 18.34 days, which was greater than the present study. Wei Peng et al.,7 noted that age alone was not an independent factor associated with the outcome of the surgery. The association was statistically not significant as p value was 0.054. Similar findings were noted in present study. In the present study, association between site of tumour and outcome of surgery was found out which showed no statistical association between site of tumour and outcome of surgery, similar findings were noted by Dao-Jun Gong et al. In study by Ilfet Songun,9 in which 711 patients underwent surgery for adenocarcinoma stomach. 174 (25%) were alive, all but one without recurrence. Over-all 15-year survival was 21% for the D1 group and 29% for the D2 group (p=0·34). Gastric-cancer-related death rate was significantly higher in the D1 group (48%, 182 patients) compared with the D2 group (37%, 123 patients), whereas death due to other diseases were similar in both groups. A study was conducted by Wei Peng et al.7 found that, 63.15% patients had ascites post-operatively while 62.40% had residual diseases post-operatively. These findings are quite different from the present study. Wei Peng et al.7 noted that, ascites and residual disease were risk factors correlated with poor survival. Multivariate analysis showed that ascites and no gastrectomy were two independent risk factors associated with poor survival. The median overall survival of the patients with or without ascites was 13 months and 21 months respectively, and the survival of the former was inferior to that of the latter. The median survival of the patients who had or had not undergone gastrectomy was 19 months and 9 months respectively, and the survival of the former was longer than that of the latter. The long-term benefit of systematic D2 lymphadenectomy has now been shown in a randomized trial: the rates of tumour-related death and of local or regional recurrence were found to be significantly lower with D2 than with D1lymphadenectomy.11

 

CONCLUSION

Majority of the study participants were in the age group of 60-65 years, 64 % were males, 36% had tumor in the body of stomach and underwent subtotal gastrectomy, 64.% had tumor in the pylorus and underwent distal gastrectomy and palliative gastro jejunostomy. Most common complication was pneumonia (20%) followed by ARDS (16%). There was no statistical association between age/ site of tumor/ type of surgery/ TNM staging compared to outcome of surgery. Highly significant statistical association was noted between ICU stay/ complications and outcome of surgery.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Chan AOO and Rashid A. CpG island methylation in precursors of gastrointestinal malignancies. Curr Mol Med. 2006;6:401-8.
  2. Mohandas KM, Jagannath P. Epidemiology of digestive tract cancers in India. VI. Projected burden in the new millennium and the need for primary prevention. Indian J Gastroenterol 2000; 19:73-8.
  3. Mohandas KM, Nagral A. Epidemiology of digestive tract cancers in India. II. Stomach, and gastrointestinal lymphomas. Indian J Gastroenterol 1998;17:24-7.
  4. Lawson, Joshua D., Jason K. Sicklick, and Paul T. Fanta. "Gastric cancer."Current problems in cancer 35.3 (2011): 97-127.
  5. Jing Chen, Dongsheng Hong, You Zhai, Peng Shen, Meta-analysis of associations between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and prognosis of gastric cancer, World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2015, 13, 1,.
  6. Gong DJ, Miao CF, Bao Q, et al. Risk factors for operative morbidity and mortality in gastric cancer patients undergoing total gastrectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(42):6560-6563. doi:10.3748/wjg.14.6560.
  7. Peng, C.‐W., Wang, L.‐W., Zeng, W.‐J., Yang, X.‐J. and Li, Y. (2013), Evaluation of the staging systems for gastric cancer. J. Surg. Oncol., 108: 93-105
  8. Ajani JA, Barthel JS, Bekaii-Saab T, Bentrem DJ, D′Amico TA, Das P, et al. Gastric cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8:378–409.
  9. Songun, I., van de Velde, C.J.H., Arends, J.W., Blok, P., Grond, A.J.K., Offerhaus, G.J.A., et al., Classification of gastric carcinoma using the Goseki system provides prognostic information additional to TNM staging. Cancer, 1999, 85: 2114-2118.
  10. D′souza MA, Singh K, Shrikhande SV. Surgery for gastric cancer: An evidence-based perspective. J Cancer Res Ther. 2009;5:225–31.
  11. Sano T, Sasako M, Yamamoto S, Nashimoto A, Kurita A, Hiratsuka M, et al. Gastric cancer surgery: Morbidity and mortality results from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic lymphadenectomy-Japan Clinical Oncology Group study 9501. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2767–73.












 


















 








 




 








 

 









Policy for Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology (Print ISSN:2579-0900) (Online ISSN: 2636-4654) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.