Home About Us Contact Us
`

 

Table of Content - Volume 19 Issue 3- September 2021


 

Study of breast conservative surgery in early breast cancer at tertiary health care center

 

Anil S Degaonkar1, Dhiraj Vinayak Asole2*, Ashish R Chavan3

 

1Associate Professor, 2Junior Resident, 3Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Dr SCGMC, Vishnupuri Nanded, Maharashtra, INDIA.

Email: anildegaonkar@Yahoo.co.in, dhiraj_asole@yahoo.com, aashish.chavan85@gmail.com

 

Abstract              Background: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer related death all over the world. Breast conservative surgery (BCS) is defined as complete removal of the breast tissue with a concentric margin of surrounding healthy tissue performed in a cosmetically acceptable manner (lumpectomy) usually followed by radiation therapy. Present study was aimed to study outcome in cases of carcinoma in early breast cancer patients who underwent breast conservative surgery at tertiary health care center. Material and Methods: Present study design was a prospective observational study conducted in early breast cancer cases with lump of less than 4cms. Results: In present study 30 patients were included and underwent breast conserving surgery. Age group 41-50 years (33%) and upper outer quadrant (60%) was most common. Ultrasonography was suggestive of neoplastic growth in 90% cases. On Mammography 94% patients had BIRADS grade 4 or more. Breast conservative surgery (BCS) was done mostly in patients with Stage IIA disease (70 %) followed by Stage IB disease (26.66 %) patients. In 6 cases, breast conserving surgery done (despite of benign etiology on FNAC) due to presence of clinically carcinomatous changes on palpation, turned out to be malignant on HPE. Post-operative complications of breast conservative surgery (BCS) were seroma (6.66%), wound infection (3.33%) and wound gape (3.33%). Infiltrating ductal carcinoma was most common type noted (80%). Lumpectomy and axillary dissection was done in 19 patients, while only lumpectomy done in 11 patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was done in all patients, 19 were positive on frozen section. On histopathological analysis of lump margins and lymph nodes 8 patients had positive lump margins, while all 19 patients who underwent axillary dissection had positive lymph nodes.26.66 % patients required modified radical mastectomy (MRM) after breast conservative surgery (BCS). While all (100 %) patients required post-operative radiotherapy and 63.33% required chemotherapy. Conclusion: Breast conservative surgery is a better alternative to MRM in cases of early breast carcinoma like stage I, stage IIA and IIb.

Keywords: Breast cancer, Breast conservative surgery, radiation therapy, MRM

 

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer related death all over the world. Breast cancer arises in breast and spread centrifugally to other sites. Surgery has central role to play in management of breast cancer. Breast conservative surgery (BCS) is defined as complete removal of the breast tissue with a concentric margin of surrounding healthy tissue performed in a cosmetically acceptable manner (lumpectomy) usually followed by radiation therapy.1 It should be noted that patient treated with BCS for cancer carry some higher risk of local recurrence of breast cancer for life.2 Local recurrence is not in correspondence with regional and visceral secondary metastatic disease, but it does not work in favor of BCS. Having in mind that number of malignant breast cancer cells at periphery of the tumour decreases progressively as we go further away from the edges, the crucial question is: how much tissue should be removed, to avoid local recurrence.3 The goal of BCT should be a 10-year local recurrence rate less than1% of lr.4 Thus patients who desire breast conserving surgery must be willing to attend postoperative radiation therapy sessions and to undergo postoperative surveillance of the treated breast. Present study was aimed to study complete cure, control of local disease in breast and axilla, breast conservation {breast form and function), prevention of local recurrences in cases of carcinoma in early breast cancer patients who underwent breast conservative surgery at tertiary health care center.

              

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Present study design was a prospective observational study conducted in Department of General Surgery, Dr SCGMC, Vishnupuri. Study duration was of 18 months (from January 2018 to June 2019). Study was approved by institutional ethical committee.

Inclusion criteria

Early breast cancer cases. Lump of less than 4 cms. Mammographically detected lesion. Clinically negative axillary nodes. Breast of adequate size and volume. Patient willing for participation and follow up for present study.

 

Exclusion criteria

Advanced or metastatic disease. Tumour size more than 4 cms. Positive axillary node. Poorly differentiated tumour. Earlier breast irradiation. Tumour/breast size ratio is more [central tumour]. Tumour beneath the nipple. Patient not willing for participation and follow up

Hemoglobin, CBC, LFT, KFT, Serum Electrolytes, Random Blood sugar, HIV, HBSAG, USG breast and axilla, FNAC, true cut biopsy, CECT abdomen and pelvis, mammography were done for each patient as a part of preoperative evaluation. A written informed consent was taken for breast conserving surgery and for re-surgery (MRM) if margins of tumour are positive and for post BCS radiation therapy. Patients were posted for wide local excision of breast lump followed by axillary dissection if required. At discharge patient is referred for radiation therapy after histopathological examination is done. After radiation therapy patient is re-examined during regular follow ups. The data collected was analysed statistically. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 24. Quantitative variables were expressed as Mean ± SD (standard deviation) while qualitative variables were expressed as relative frequency and percentage.


RESULTS

In present study 30 patients were included and underwent breast conserving surgery. Age group 41-50 years was most common (33 %) followed by 31-40 years (23 %) and 51-60 years (20 %).

 

Table 1: Age wise distribution of carcinoma breast patients

AGE (YRS)

NO OF CASES OF BCS

PERCENTAGE

20-30

04

13.33%

31-40

07

23.33%

41-50

10

33.33%

51-60

06

20.00%

61-70

02

06.66%

71-80

01

03.33%

Upper outer quadrant (60%) was most common area involved in present study.

 

Table 2: Quadrants involved in carcinoma breast

Quadrant Involved

No Of Cases(n 30)

Percentage

Upper outer

18

60%

Lower outer

7

23.33%

Upper inner

4

13.33%

Lower inner

1

03.33%

17/30 patients had menarche at less than 13 years. There is a strong relationship between early menarche and late menopause and carcinoma breast

 

Table 3: Relationship between early menarche and carcinoma breast

Age of menarche

No Of Cases (n = 30)

12

4

13

13

14

12

15

1

Ultrasonography is used for imaging breast lump and axillary lymphadenopathy and plays an important role in resolving equivocal mammographic findings. USG examination was suggestive of neoplastic growth in 90% cases.

 

Table 4: Relationship between USG findings and breast carcinoma

Breast Lump Ultrasonography Findings

CASES

PERCENTAGE

Neoplastic

27

90%

Non-neoplastic

3

10%

Mammography plays very important role in identifying neoplastic lesion as compared to clinical examination. On Mammography 94% patients had BIRADS grade 4 or more.

 

Table 5: Mammographic findings of carcinoma breast

BIRADS GRADE

CASES

PERCENTAGE

3

2

6.66%

4

17

56.66%

5

11

36.66%

In present study, breast conservative surgery (BCS) was done mostly in patients with Stage IIA disease (70 %) followed by Stage IB disease (26.66 %) patients.

 

Table 6: Stages of carcinoma breast treated by BCS

STAGE OF DISEASE

CASES (n =30)

PERCENTAGE

IB

8

26.66%

IIA

21

70%

IIB

1

3.33%

In 6 cases, breast conserving surgery done ( despite of benign etiology on FNAC) due to presence of clinically carcinomatous changes on palpation, turned out to be malignant on HPE (20%).

 

Table 7: Corelation between FNAC findings and postoperative HPE

Sr no

FNAC

Clinical status on palpation

HPE

1

Benign epithelial lesion

Hard lump

Infiltrating ductal carcinoma

2

Sclerosing adenosis

Hard lump

Medullary carcinoma

3

Moderate dysplasia

Hard lump

Infiltrating ductal carcinoma

4

Fibrocystic disease

Hard lump

Infiltrating ductal carcinoma

5

Fibroadenoma

Hard lump

Microinvasive papillary carcinoma

6

Mastitis

Hard lump

Infiltrating ductal carcinoma

Post-operative complications of breast conservative surgery (BCS) were seroma (6.66%), wound infection (3.33%) and wound gape (3.33%).

Table 8: Post-operative complications of BCS

Postoperative complications

No of cases

Percentage

Seroma

2

6.66%

Wound infection

1

3.33%

Wound gape

1

3.33%

Generally, postoperatively patient is discharged on day 5 but postoperative stay is prolonged in cases of complications like seroma formation ,wound infection , wound gape etc.

Table 9: Postoperative hospital stay in cases of BCS.

Post BCS complications

Postoperative hospital stay

No of cases

Percentage

No postoperative complications

5 days

28

93.33%

Post-operative complications like seroma ,wound infection ,wound gape

10 to 12 days

02

06.66%

 Various types of carcinoma breast are detected on histopathological examination, infiltrating ductal carcinoma was most common type noted (80%).

Table 10: Post BCS histopathological analysis

Types of Ca breast on HPE

No of cases (n=30)

Percentage

Infiltrating ductal carcinoma

24

80

Medullary carcinoma

2

7

Mucinous carcinoma

1

3

Papillary carcinoma

2

7

Ductal carcinoma in situ

1

3

Lumpectomy and axillary dissection was done in 19 patients, while only lumpectomy done in 11 patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was done in all patients, 19 were positive on frozen section.

Table 11: Surgery in early breast carcinoma

Lumpectomy alone, No axillary dissection

11

36.66%

Lumpectomy with axillary dissection

19

63.33%

Total no of cases of BCS with SLND done

30

 

SLND positive on frozen section

19

 

SLND negative on frozen section

11

 

On histopathological analysis of lump margins and lymph nodes 8 patients had positive lump margins, while all 19 patients who underwent axillary dissection had positive lymph nodes.

 

Table 12: Histopathological analysis of lump margins and lymph nodes

Specimen

Positive for tumour tissue

Negative for tumour tissue

Breast lump margin

08

22

Axillary lymph nodes

19

0

26.66 % patients required modified radical mastectomy (MRM) after breast conservative surgery (BCS). While all (100 %) patients required post-operative radiotherapy and 63.33% required chemotherapy. All patients had completed 3 follow up visits (at 1,2 and 6 months). No mortality was noted during study period and follow up.

 

Table 13: Post BCS radiotherapy and chemotherapy

Post-operative treatment

Cases

Percentage

BCS followed by MRM

8

26.66%

Radiotherapy

30

100%

Chemotherapy

19

63.33%

 


DISCUSSION

Breast conserving surgery (BCS) with radiation therapy is today standard therapy for low, grade Breast Cancer. It is safe and preferred therapeutic procedure in all early detected breast cancers, because it provides the same level of overall survival as mastectomy. Besides that, BCS provides much better cosmetic effect, compared to radical treatments, a significant gain for patients, if tumours of grade I and II are considered. Increased exposure to estrogen is associated with an increased risk for developing breast cancer, whereas reducing exposure is thought to be protective.5,6 Correspondingly, factors that increase the number of menstrual cycles, such as early menarche, nulliparity, and late menopause, are associated with increased risk. Moderate levels of exercise and a longer lactation period, factors that decrease the total number of menstrual cycles, are protective. Similar findings were noted in present study. FNAC or core biopsy of a palpable breast mass can usually be performed in an outpatient setting.7 In our study out of 30 cases of carcinoma breast 06 cases shows non-malignant lesion on FNAC, (approx. 20% of false negative results). So in suspicious case were FNAC is doubtful repeat FNAC or core biopsy is taken. Fisher and colleagues found that accurate predictions regarding the occurrence of distant metastases were possible after resection and pathologic analysis of 10 or more level I and II axillary lymph nodes.9  Fine-needle aspiration(FNA) or core biopsy of sonographically indeterminate or suspicious lymph nodes can provide a more definitive diagnosis than ultrasonography alone.10 Ultrasonography is used to guide fine-needle aspiration biopsy, core-needle biopsy, and needle localization of breast lesion. Mammography is more accurate than clinical examination for the detection of early breast cancers, providing a true-positive rate of 90%. Only 20% of women with nonpalpable cancers had axillary lymph node metastases, compared with 50% of women with palpable cancers.11 Starting at age 40 years, breast examinations should be performed yearly and a yearly mammogram should be taken. The benefits from screening mammography in women >50 years of age has been noted above to be between 20% and 25% reduction in breast cancer Mortality.11 The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) is used to categorize the degree of suspicion of malignancy for a mammographic abnormality. To avoid unnecessary biopsies for low-suspicion mammographic findings, probably benign lesions are designated BI-RADS 3 and are monitored with short-interval mammograms over a 2-year period. Biopsy is performed only for lesions that progress during follow-up. In our study 2 cases belongs to grade 3(6.66%), 17 cases belongs to grade 4 (56.66%) and 11 cases belongs to grade 5 (36.66%). Investigators directly compared digital vs. screen film mammography and found that digital and screen film mammography had similar accuracy; however, digital mammography was more accurate in women <50 years of age, women with mammographically dense breasts, and premenopausal or perimenopausal women.12 Breast conservation involves resection of the primary breast cancer with a margin of normal -appearing breast tissue, adjuvant radiation therapy, and assessment of regional lymph node status.13 Resection of the primary breast cancer is alternatively called segmental mastectomy, lumpectomy, partial mastectomy, wide local excision, and tylectomy. For many women with stage I or II breast cancer, breast-conserving therapy (BCT) is preferable to total mastectomy because BCT produces survival rates equivalent to those after total mastectomy while preserving the breast.14 BCT allows for preservation of breast shape and skin as well as preservation of sensation, and provides an overall psychologic advantage associated with breast preservation. Breast conservation surgery is currently the standard treatment for women with stage 0, I, or II invasive breast cancer. The breast cancer is removed with an envelope of normal-appearing breast tissue that is adequate to achieve a cancer-free margin. Significant controversy exists on the appropriate margin width for BCT.15 Radiation therapy is used for all stages of breast cancer depending on whether the patient is undergoing BCT or mastectomy.16 After 5- and 8-year follow-up periods, the disease-free (DFS), distant disease-free, and overall survival (OS) rates for lumpectomy with or without radiation therapy were similar to those observed after total mastectomy. However, the incidence of ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence was higher in the group not receiving radiation therapy.17 Adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer is considered for patients with node-positive cancers, patients with cancers that are >1 cm. Good cosmetic effect is of key importance when using BCS, balanced with width of excision, and achieving low local recurrence rate. Present study was a single center, non-randomised, observational study, larger studies are needed to confirm our findings.

 

CONCLUSION

Breast Conservative Surgery is considered as a better alternative to MRM in cases of early breast carcinoma like stage I, stage IIA and IIb. Major morbidity associated with MRM such as disfiguration of breast, psychological trauma, lymphoedema of upper limb can be avoided. With proper selection of patients and with availability of radiation therapy ,all cases of early breast cancers can be managed by breast conservative surgery.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Schwartz GF, Veronesi U, Clough KB. et al. Consensus Conference on Breast Conservation. Seminars in Breast Disease. Milano, 2005:178-185.
  2. Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg. 2002; 184: 383-393.
  3. Veronesi U. How Important Is the Assessment of Resection Margins in Conservative Surgery for Breast Cancer? Editorial. 1994: 1660-16
  4. Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al: Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21:704–716, 2014.
  5. Blackburn GL, Copeland T, Khaodhiar L, et al. Diet and breast cancer. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003;12:183-192.
  6. Singletary SE. Rating the risk factors for breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2003;237:474-482.
  7. Wilkinson EJ, Masood S. Cytologic needle samplings of the breast: Techniques and end results. In: Bland KI, Copeland EMI, eds. The Breast: Comprehensive Management of Benign and Malignant Diseases. Philadelphia: WB Saunders;1998:705.
  8. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, eds. Breast. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 6th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag: 2002.
  9. Krishnamurthy S, Sneige N, Bedi DG, et al. Role of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of indeterminate and suspiciousaxillary lymph nodes in the initial staging of breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2002;95:982-988.
  10. Britton PD, Goud A, Godward S, et al. Use of ultrasounguided axillary node core biopsy in staging of early breast cancer. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:561-569.
  11. Glasziou P, Houssami N. The evidence base for breast cancer screening. Prev Med. 2011;53:100-102.
  12. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1773-1783
  13. Newman LA, Washington TA. New trends in breast conservation therapy. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83:841-883.
  14. Group EBCTC. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10 801 women in17 randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;378:1707-1716.
  15. Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, et al. Meta-analysis of the impact of surgical margins on local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Cancer.. 2010;46:3219-3232.
  16. Recht A, Edge SB, Solin LJ, et al. Postmastectomy radiotherapy:clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1539-1569
  17. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy,lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation forthe treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med.2002;347:1233-1241.






































 








 




 








 

 









Policy for Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology (Print ISSN:2579-0900) (Online ISSN: 2636-4654) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.